Neuronal Plasticity and Age-related Decline in Motor Cortex Function

Ryo Chen^*
*Correspondence: Ryo Chen, Department of Biomedicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, Email:

Keywords

Plasticity • Mobility • Aging

Introduction

Neuronal plasticity in the motor cortex involves synaptic plasticity, dendritic remodeling, and neurogenesis. Synaptic plasticity, including longterm potentiation and long-term depression ,enhances or reduces synaptic strength, respectively. LTP is associated with the strengthening of synapses through increased neurotransmitter release and receptor density, while LTD involves the weakening of synapses. These processes are essential for learning new motor skills and adapting to changing environments. Dendritic remodeling refers to the structural changes in dendrites, such as growth, branching, and spine formation, which enhance the neuron's ability to form new synaptic connections.

Literature Review

Neurogenesis, although limited in the adult motor cortex, involves the generation of new neurons from neural stem cells, contributing to plasticity. As individuals age, neuronal plasticity in the motor cortex declines, impacting motor function. Several age-related changes contribute to this decline Aging is associated with a decrease in LTP and an increase in LTD. This imbalance leads to a reduction in synaptic strength and a diminished capacity for learning new motor skills. Older adults exhibit dendritic atrophy, characterized by reduced dendritic length and spine density. This structural decline limits the neuron's ability to form new connections, impairing plasticity. Age-related changes in neurotransmitter systems, such as decreased dopamine and acetylcholine levels, affect synaptic plasticity and motor function [1].

Dopamine, in particular, plays a crucial role in motor learning and coordination. Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress increase with age, leading to neuronal damage and impaired plasticity. Inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species can disrupt synaptic function and dendritic structure. With aging, motor skills deteriorate, leading to slower movements, decreased coordination, and impaired balance. These changes result from the cumulative effects of reduced plasticity, synaptic loss, and structural alterations in the motor cortex. Studies using functional MRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation have shown decreased motor cortex activation and cortical excitability in older adults, correlating with impaired motor performance [2].

Discussion

Aging also affects cortical reorganization, the brain's ability to adapt by reallocating resources to maintain function. In older adults, there is a shift from focal to more diffuse activation patterns in the motor cortex during motor tasks. This compensatory mechanism, known as dedifferentiation, reflects a decline in the specificity and efficiency of neural networks. While dedifferentiation may help maintain performance, it indicates a reduced capacity for precise motor control. White matter integrity, crucial for efficient neural communication, declines with age. Degeneration of white matter tracts, such as the corticospinal tract, impairs signal transmission between the motor cortex and spinal cord, leading to slower and less coordinated movements.

Diffusion tensor imaging studies have revealed age-related reductions in white matter integrity, particularly in regions involved in motor control. Aging affects neurotransmitter systems that are essential for motor function. Dopamine, a key modulator of motor activity, decreases with age, contributing to motor deficits. Reduced dopamine levels in the basal ganglia, a region interconnected with the motor cortex, lead to impaired movement initiation and coordination. Additionally, age-related declines in acetylcholine and serotonin levels impact synaptic plasticity and motor control. Physical exercise is one of the most effective interventions for mitigating age-related decline in motor cortex function [3].

Regular aerobic and resistance exercise promotes neuroplasticity by increasing neurotrophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor, which support synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis. Exercise also enhances blood flow to the brain, reduces inflammation, and improves neurotransmitter function. Studies have shown that physically active older adults exhibit better motor performance, increased motor cortex activation, and greater white matter integrity compared to sedentary individuals. Cognitive training programs that target motor skills and coordination can enhance motor cortex plasticity and function in older adults. These programs often involve tasks that require fine motor control, balance, and coordination, stimulating synaptic plasticity and cortical reorganization. Combining cognitive and physical training may provide synergistic benefits, enhancing both cognitive and motor functions. Pharmacological approaches aim to enhance neuroplasticity and motor function by targeting neurotransmitter systems and neurotrophic factors. For instance, dopaminergic drugs, such as levodopa, can improve motor performance by increasing dopamine levels in the brain. Other pharmacological agents, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, may enhance acetylcholine signaling and synaptic plasticity [4].

Additionally, interventions targeting inflammation and oxidative stress, such as anti-inflammatory drugs and antioxidants, may protect against agerelated neuronal damage. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, can modulate cortical excitability and promote plasticity. TMS involves the application of magnetic pulses to the motor cortex, inducing changes in neuronal activity and enhancing synaptic plasticity. tDCS delivers low electrical currents to the scalp, modulating cortical excitability and promoting plasticity. These techniques have shown promise in improving motor function and reducing age-related decline in older adults. Nutritional factors also play a role in supporting neuronal plasticity and motor function [5].

Diets rich in antioxidants, omega-3 fatty acids, and B vitamins have been associated with better cognitive and motor outcomes in older adults. Omega-3 fatty acids, found in fish oil, support synaptic plasticity and reduce inflammation, while antioxidants protect against oxidative stress. B vitamins, particularly B6, B12, and folate, are essential for neurotransmitter synthesis and neuronal health. Future research should focus on developing personalized interventions that consider individual differences in genetics, lifestyle, and health status. Personalized exercise programs, cognitive training, and pharmacological treatments tailored to an individual's unique profile may enhance the efficacy of interventions and mitigate age-related decline in motor cortex function more effectively.

Longitudinal studies tracking changes in motor cortex function and plasticity over time are essential for understanding the progression of agerelated decline and identifying early biomarkers of functional decline. These studies can also help assess the long-term effects of interventions and inform the development of preventive strategies. Further research is needed to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying age-related changes in neuronal plasticity and motor cortex function. Understanding the molecular and cellular processes that drive these changes can inform the development of targeted therapies and interventions. Combining multiple intervention approaches, such as exercise, cognitive training, pharmacological treatments, and noninvasive brain stimulation, may provide synergistic benefits and enhance the overall efficacy of interventions. Future research should explore the optimal combinations and sequences of these approaches to maximize their impact on neuronal plasticity and motor function [6].

Conclusion

Neuronal plasticity is critical for maintaining motor cortex function and adapting to age-related changes. While aging leads to a decline in plasticity and motor function, various interventions, including physical exercise, cognitive training, pharmacological treatments, non-invasive brain stimulation, and nutritional interventions, can mitigate these effects. Continued research into the mechanisms of age-related decline and the development of personalized, multimodal interventions holds promise for preserving motor function and enhancing the quality of life in older adults.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Ribeiro, João Nuno, Bruno Gonçalves, Diogo Coutinho and João Brito, et al. "Activity profile and physical performance of match play in elite futsal players." Front Psychol 11 (2020): 563770.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Spyrou, Konstantinos, Tomás T. Freitas, Elena Marín-Cascales and Pedro E. Alcaraz. "Physical and physiological match-play demands and player characteristics in futsal: A systematic review." Front Psychol 11 (2020): 569897.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Ohmuro, Tatsuhiro, Yusuke Iso, Akinori Tobita and Shu Hirose, et al. "Physical match performance of Japanese top-level futsal players in different categories and playing positions." Biol Sport 37 (2020): 359-365.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Pino-Ortega, José, Daniel Rojas-Valverde, Carlos David Gómez-Carmona and Alejandro Bastida-Castillo, et al. "Impact of contextual factors on external load during a congested-fixture tournament in elite U’18 basketball players." Front Psychol 10 (2019): 448005.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Rojas-Valverde, Daniel, Randall Gutiérrez-Vargas, Alejandro Rodríguez-Montero and Lucas A. Pereira, et al. "Reduced muscle contractile function in elite young soccer players after a short-congested fixture period." Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports En Technol 233 (2019): 249-257.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Teixeira, José E. Luís Branquinho, Ricardo Ferraz and Miguel Leal, et al. "Weekly training load across a standard microcycle in a sub-elite youth football academy: A comparison between starters and non-starters." Int J Environ Res Public Health 19 (2022): 11611.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at