Novel and Optimized Efficient Transmission Using Dynamic Routing Technique for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

Sobitha Nelson^*
*Correspondence: Sobitha Nelson, Department of Information Technology, Sri Sairam University, Tamil Nadu, India, Email:

Keywords

Underwater acoustic sensor networks • Wireless communication • Transmission

Introduction

Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks (UASNs) are critical for a wide range of applications including environmental monitoring, underwater exploration, and military operations. These networks use acoustic signals to communicate between sensors deployed in underwater environments, which presents unique challenges due to the harsh conditions and dynamic nature of underwater environments. Efficient transmission of data in UASNs is crucial for ensuring reliable and timely communication. Traditional routing techniques often struggle with issues such as high latency, limited bandwidth, and energy constraints. Novel and optimized routing techniques that adapt dynamically to changing conditions can significantly enhance the performance of UASNs. This paper explores advanced dynamic routing techniques designed to optimize transmission efficiency in UASNs, addressing key challenges and proposing innovative solutions to improve network performance [1].

Literature Review

The research on routing in UASNs has evolved significantly, reflecting the unique challenges of underwater communication. Early studies focused on static routing protocols, which did not account for the dynamic nature of underwater environments. For instance, the work provided foundational insights into the challenges of underwater acoustic communication, including issues related to multipath propagation and variable signal attenuation. Recent advancements have introduced dynamic routing techniques that better address these challenges. For example, the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol has been adapted for underwater environments to improve data transmission efficiency by dynamically adjusting routes based on current network conditions. More recent research has explored hybrid and adaptive routing approaches. The work presented a hybrid routing protocol that combines geographic and opportunistic routing strategies to optimize data delivery in UASNs. This approach leverages real-time network information and environmental conditions to select the most efficient route. Similarly, the Adaptive Routing Protocol (ARP) adapts its routing strategy based on real-time network metrics such as node density and link quality. These advancements reflect a growing focus on dynamic and context-aware routing solutions designed to enhance transmission efficiency in UASNs [2,3].

Discussion

The application of dynamic routing techniques in UASNs offers several advantages over traditional static routing protocols. One of the primary benefits is the ability to adapt to the dynamic and unpredictable nature of underwater environments. Dynamic routing protocols can adjust to changes in network topology, such as node mobility or varying link quality, by selecting optimal paths for data transmission in real-time. This adaptability helps to minimize latency and improve the reliability of data delivery. Novel techniques such as hybrid routing protocols and adaptive strategies have shown promising results in addressing the limitations of traditional approaches. For instance, hybrid protocols that combine geographic and opportunistic routing leverage the strengths of both methods, offering improved performance in diverse conditions. Adaptive routing protocols further enhance efficiency by continuously adjusting routing decisions based on real-time data and environmental factors [4].

However, implementing dynamic routing in UASNs also presents challenges. One significant challenge is the increased computational complexity and overhead associated with dynamic route calculation and maintenance. Ensuring that routing protocols can operate efficiently within the constraints of underwater sensor nodes, which often have limited processing power and energy resources, is crucial. Additionally, dynamic routing solutions must address issues related to data integrity and security, particularly in sensitive applications such as military or environmental monitoring. Energy efficiency is another critical consideration. Many dynamic routing protocols require frequent updates and communication between nodes, which can deplete the limited energy resources of underwater sensors. Strategies to minimize energy consumption while maintaining effective routing performance are essential for the long-term viability of these networks [5,6].

Conclusion

Novel and optimized dynamic routing techniques for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks (UASNs) represent a significant advancement in addressing the unique challenges of underwater communication. By leveraging adaptive and hybrid routing strategies, these techniques offer improved efficiency in data transmission, reduced latency, and enhanced reliability. Despite these advantages, challenges such as computational complexity, energy consumption, and data security must be carefully managed. On-going research and development are needed to refine these routing techniques and address their limitations. The continued evolution of dynamic routing solutions will play a crucial role in advancing the capabilities of UASNs and enabling more effective underwater monitoring and communication.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Lin, Chun-Cheng, Der-Jiunn Deng and Shang-Bin Wang. "Extending the lifetime of dynamic underwater acoustic sensor networks using multi-population harmony search algorithm." IEEE Sens J 16 (2015): 4034-4042.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Rossi, Pierluigi Salvo, Domenico Ciuonzo, Torbjörn Ekman and Hefeng Dong. "Energy detection for MIMO decision fusion in underwater sensor networks." IEEE Sens J 15 (2014): 1630-1640.

   Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Castelli, Mauro, Sara Silva, Luca Manzoni and Leonardo Vanneschi. "Geometric selective harmony search." Inf Sci 279 (2014): 468-482.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Iyer, Sidharth and D. Vijay Rao. "Genetic algorithm based optimization technique for underwater sensor network positioning and deployment." 2015 IEEE underwater technology (UT), IEEE (2015): 1-6.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Ibrahim, Saleh, Jun Liu, Manal Al-Bzoor and Jun-Hong Cui, et al. "Towards efficient dynamic surface gateway deployment for underwater network." Ad Hoc Netw 11 (2013): 2301-2312.

   Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Brataas, Gunnar, Arne Lie and Tor Arne Reinen. "Scalability analysis of underwater sensor networks." 2013 MTS/IEEE OCEANS-Bergen IEEE (2013): 1-9.

   Google Scholar