Operational Challenges of Fluidized Bed Combustion in Biomass Energy Conversion: Bed Agglomeration and Material Deposition

Vivek Vardhaman^*
*Correspondence: Vivek Vardhaman, Department of Pharmacy, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, Email:

Keywords

Biomass • Energy • X-ray microtomography

Introduction

The interaction between the bed material and fuel ash, causing layer formation on bed particles, is a key factor contributing to bed agglomeration. Recent research has shown that different types of bed particles, such as quartz and K-feldspar, exhibit varying layer formation mechanisms when used in the combustion of woody biomass. Biomass energy conversion technology has gained traction in recent years due to its potential for providing a sustainable and renewable energy source. Among the various technologies for converting biomass to energy, fluidized bed combustion is a conventional method that offers several advantages such as fuel flexibility, high efficiency, and low environmental impact. However, fluidized bed combustion also poses some operational challenges, such as bed agglomeration and bed material deposition, which may lead to complete bed defluidization and unscheduled plant shutdowns. Researchers have identified that layer formation on bed particles, caused by the interaction between bed material and fuel ash, is a crucial factor contributing to bed agglomeration. Understanding this process can help optimize the combustion process and reduce operational problems [1].

Recent studies have shown that different bed particle types exhibit different layer formation mechanisms during the combustion of woody biomass. This can lead to varying bed agglomeration risks and impacts on plant operation. The use of X-ray microtomography has emerged as a valuable tool for studying bed particle layer formation and its relationship with bed agglomeration in fluidized bed combustion. X-ray microtomography is a non-destructive imaging technique that allows for the visualization of the internal structure of bed particles. This technique provides three-dimensional images of the bed particles, allowing researchers to analyze their morphology and changes in the particle structure during combustion. This information can help researchers better understand the layer formation process on bed particles and its impact on bed agglomeration [2].

Description

In a recent study, researchers investigated the layer formation mechanisms of quartz and K-feldspar bed particles during the combustion of woody biomass using X-ray microtomography. The results showed that the layer formation process on the two types of bed particles differed significantly. Quartz particles exhibited a more uniform layer formation process, with the layers forming around the particle circumference, while K-feldspar particles showed a more heterogeneous layer formation, with the layers forming at various locations on the particle surface [3,4].

The researchers also found that the layer thickness increased with the combustion time for both types of bed particles. However, the layer thickness was higher for K-feldspar particles than for quartz particles. This difference in layer thickness is likely due to the differences in the layer formation mechanisms between the two particle types. The study highlights the importance of understanding bed particle layer formation in fluidized bed combustion. By using X-ray microtomography, researchers can gain a better understanding of the layer formation mechanisms and their relationship with bed agglomeration. This information can help optimize the combustion process and reduce the operational problems associated with bed agglomeration and material deposition. The use of woody biomass in fluidized bed combustion provides several benefits for sustainable energy production. However, bed agglomeration and material deposition remain significant operational problems. Understanding the layer formation process on bed particles is crucial in mitigating these problems. The use of X-ray microtomography provides a valuable tool for studying bed particle layer formation and its relationship with bed agglomeration in fluidized bed combustion [5].

Biomass energy conversion technology has been gaining popularity in recent years as a sustainable and renewable energy source. Fluidized bed combustion is one of the conventional methods used for converting biomass to energy. It offers several advantages such as fuel flexibility, high efficiency, and low environmental impact. However, this technology also poses operational challenges such as bed agglomeration and material deposition. These challenges can cause significant issues and reduce the lifespan of the plant equipment.

Bed agglomeration occurs when particles in the fluidized bed stick together due to high temperatures and the presence of alkali and other minerals. As the bed particles agglomerate, they can clog the bed, reducing the fluidization and combustion efficiency. If the bed agglomeration continues, it can lead to complete defluidization and plant shutdown. Material deposition is another significant operational challenge in fluidized bed combustion. It occurs when ash and other particulate matter in the fuel deposit on the bed particles. This deposition can reduce the porosity of the bed particles and eventually lead to defluidization [6].

Several factors contribute to bed agglomeration and material deposition in fluidized bed combustion. One of the primary factors is the interaction between the bed material and fuel ash. The bed material's composition and its interaction with the fuel ash can affect the bed's agglomeration potential. The fuel properties such as ash content, composition, and particle size distribution can also play a role in bed agglomeration and material deposition. One of the ways to mitigate bed agglomeration and material deposition is to choose appropriate bed materials. Bed materials that have high melting points and low reactivity with fuel ash can help reduce bed agglomeration and material deposition. In addition, using additives such as kaolin and lime can also help reduce bed agglomeration.

Another approach to mitigate bed agglomeration and material deposition is to use online monitoring systems. These systems can detect changes in the bed's temperature, pressure, and gas composition, indicating the onset of bed agglomeration or material deposition. The system can then trigger appropriate responses such as reducing the fuel feed rate or introducing additives to the bed. In recent years, researchers have used advanced techniques such as X-ray microtomography to study the bed particle layer formation process and its relationship with bed agglomeration. This technique allows for the visualization of the internal structure of the bed particles and the changes in particle morphology during combustion. Understanding the layer formation process can help optimize the combustion process and reduce bed agglomeration.

Conclusion

Fluidized bed combustion offers several benefits for biomass energy conversion. However, bed agglomeration and material deposition remain significant operational challenges. Choosing appropriate bed materials, using additives, and implementing online monitoring systems can help mitigate these challenges. Advanced techniques such as X-ray microtomography can also provide valuable insights into the bed particle layer formation process and its relationship with bed agglomeration. Optimizing the combustion process can lead to improved efficiency, reduced operational problems, and increased lifespan of the plant equipment.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Gatternig, Bernhard and Jurgen Karl. "Investigations on the mechanisms of ash-induced agglomeration in fluidized-bed combustion of biomass." Energy Fuels 29 (2015): 931-941.

Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Öhman, Marcus and Anders Nordin. "The role of kaolin in prevention of bed agglomeration during fluidized bed combustion of biomass fuels." Energy Fuels 14 (2000): 618-624.

Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Mahmoudi, Shiva, Jan Baeyens and Jonathan PK Seville. "NOx formation and Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) in a fluidized bed combustor of biomass." Biomass Bioenergy 34 (2010): 1393-1409.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Tarelho, La., DSF Neves and MAA Matos. "Forest biomass waste combustion in a pilot-scale bubbling fluidised bed combustor." Biomass Bioenergy 35 (2011): 1511-1523.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Diba, Mst Farhana, Md Rezwanul Karim and Jamal Naser. "Numerical modelling of a bubbling fluidized bed combustion: A simplified approach." Fuel 277 (2020): 118170.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Abanades, J Carlos, Edward J Anthony, Jinsheng Wang and John E Oakey. "Fluidized bed combustion systems integrating CO2 capture with CaO." Environ Sci Tech 39 (2005): 2861-2866.

Google Scholar, Crossref