Opinions on Thermochemical Recycling of Plastic Wastes at the End of Their Life for Alternative Fuels

Elowen Frost^*
*Correspondence: Elowen Frost, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria 810107, Kaduna State, Nigeria, Email:

Keywords

Thermochemical recycling • Plastic waste • Gasification

Introduction

The escalating production and improper disposal of plastic waste pose a significant environmental challenge. Traditional methods of waste management have proven inadequate, prompting the exploration of advanced recycling technologies. Thermochemical recycling, involving processes like pyrolysis and gasification, has garnered attention for its potential to convert plastic waste into alternative fuels. This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of opinions and perspectives on the application of thermochemical processes in addressing the plastic waste crisis and promoting a sustainable energy future. The proliferations of single-use plastics and inadequate recycling infrastructure have led to an alarming increase in plastic waste generation. Landfills are overflowing, and incineration poses environmental and health risks. Thermochemical recycling offers a promising alternative, providing a means to convert plastic waste into valuable energy resources, thereby reducing reliance on fossil fuels and mitigating plastic pollution [1].

Literature Review

Pyrolysis is a thermal decomposition process that involves heating plastic waste in the absence of oxygen, resulting in the production of gases, pyrolysis oil, and solid char. Pyrolysis oil can be further processed into valuable fuels. Gasification is a thermochemical process where plastic waste is converted into a synthesis gas (syngas) comprising hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane. Syngas can be used for various applications, including power generation and the production of transportation fuels. Opinions among experts regarding the technical feasibility of thermochemical recycling are generally positive. Advances in reactor design, catalyst development, and process optimization have significantly improved efficiency and yield. However, challenges such as feedstock variability, reactor scalability, and standardization of product quality require on-going research and development efforts [2].

Opinions on the economic viability of thermochemical recycling vary. While initial capital investment and operational costs may present challenges, proponents argue that long-term benefits, including reduced landfill expenses and revenue from the sale of alternative fuels, can outweigh the upfront expenditures. Furthermore, a growing market for renewable and sustainable fuels provides a promising avenue for the commercialization of thermochemical recycling technologies. Thermochemical recycling of plastic waste offers notable environmental benefits. By diverting plastic waste from landfills and incineration, it reduces greenhouse gas emissions and conserves natural resources. Additionally, the production of alternative fuels from plastic waste contributes to the decarbonisation of the energy sector, aligning with global efforts to combat climate change [3].

Opinions among policymakers regarding the integration of thermochemical recycling into waste management strategies vary. Some advocate for incentivizing and supporting the development of thermochemical recycling technologies through regulatory frameworks, subsidies, and tax incentives. Others emphasize the need for stringent quality standards and emissions controls to ensure the environmental integrity of the process. Public awareness and acceptance play a crucial role in the success of thermochemical recycling initiatives. Educating the public about the benefits of this technology, its role in waste reduction, and its contribution to a more sustainable future is essential. Engaging communities and stakeholders in the decision-making process can foster a more favourable environment for the widespread adoption of thermochemical recycling [4].

Discussion

On-going research and development in thermochemical recycling are driving innovations in process efficiency, feedstock flexibility, and product quality. Advanced reactor designs, improved catalysts, and novel process configurations are continually enhancing the viability of thermochemical recycling as a sustainable waste management solution. Furthermore, the integration of digital technologies and automation in recycling facilities holds the potential to further optimize operations and reduce costs. International perspectives on thermochemical recycling vary based on regional policies, infrastructure, and economic considerations. Case studies from different parts of the world highlight successful implementations of thermochemical recycling technologies and offer valuable insights into best practices. These examples serve as valuable references for policymakers and industry stakeholders looking to adopt similar approaches in their respective regions [5].

The success of thermochemical recycling initiatives often hinges on collaboration between governments, research institutions, industry players, and communities. Public-private partnerships, joint ventures, and collaborative research projects are instrumental in pooling resources, expertise, and funding for the development and deployment of thermochemical recycling technologies. These collaborative efforts can accelerate the transition towards a more sustainable waste management ecosystem. Despite its promise, thermochemical recycling faces several challenges that require concerted efforts to overcome. These challenges include regulatory frameworks, public acceptance, technological maturity, and economic competitiveness. Addressing these issues will require a multifaceted approach that involves policy support, continued research, market incentives, and public engagement [6].

The future of thermochemical recycling holds significant potential in revolutionizing waste management and energy production. To fully realize this potential, it is imperative to prioritize research and development efforts, establish supportive policy frameworks, and engage in robust stakeholder collaboration. Additionally, education and awareness campaigns aimed at promoting the benefits and feasibility of thermochemical recycling will play a crucial role in garnering public support.

Conclusion

Opinions on thermochemical recycling of plastic waste for alternative fuels encompass a diverse range of perspectives from experts, policymakers, and stakeholders. While technical feasibility and environmental benefits garner significant support, economic viability and regulatory considerations remain subject to debate. Nevertheless, the potential of thermochemical recycling as a pivotal component in achieving a more sustainable and circular economy is evident, highlighting the urgency of continued research, investment, and collaboration in this field.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. do Sul, Juliana A. Ivar and Monica F. Costa. "The present and future of microplastic pollution in the marine environment." Environ Pollut 185 (2014): 352-364.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Shan, Shan, Yifan Zhang, Huiwen Zhao and Tao Zeng, et al. "Polystyrene nanoplastics penetrate across the blood-brain barrier and induce activation of microglia in the brain of mice." Chemosphere 298 (2022): 134261.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at           

3. Christensen, Peter R., Angelique M. Scheuermann, Kathryn E. Loeffler and Brett A. Helms. "Closed-loop recycling of plastics enabled by dynamic covalent diketoenamine bonds." Nat Chem 11 (2019): 442-448.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Eriksen, Marie K., Jesper D. Christiansen, Anders E. Daugaard and Thomas F. Astrup. "Closing the loop for PET, PE and PP waste from households: Influence of material properties and product design for plastic recycling." Waste Manage 96 (2019): 75-85.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Saito, Keita, Fabian Eisenreich, Tankut Türel and Željko Tomović. "closed‐loop recycling of poly (imine‐carbonate) derived from plastic waste and bio‐based resources." Angew Chem Int Ed 61 (2022): e202211806.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Miandad, R., A. S. Nizami, M. Rehan and M. A. Barakat, et al. "Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil." Waste Manage 58 (2016): 250-259.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at