Optimizing Bioprocesses: Strategies for Efficiency and Sustainability in Biotechnology

Mariana Monteiro^*
*Correspondence: Mariana Monteiro, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada, Email:

Keywords

Optimizing bioprocesses • Bio production • Biological systems

Introduction

Bioprocesses involve the use of living organisms, such as bacteria, yeast, fungi, or mammalian cells, to produce valuable products or carry out specific functions. These organisms serve as bio factories, producing pharmaceuticals, enzymes, biofuels and other bio products through complex biochemical pathways. The efficiency of these processes is influenced by various factors, including nutrient availability, environmental conditions and the genetic makeup of the organisms. The optimization process often begins with the improvement of the microbial or cellular strains used in bio production. This can involve genetic engineering to enhance specific traits, such as higher productivity, substrate utilization, or resistance to environmental stress. Through techniques like synthetic biology, researchers can design and construct custom organisms tailored to the desired bioprocess [1].

Literature Review

The growth medium is a crucial factor in bioprocess optimization. The composition of nutrients, pH and other environmental conditions significantly influences the performance of the organisms. Media optimization involves finetuning these parameters to support optimal growth and productivity. This can lead to higher yields and reduced production costs. Real-time monitoring and control of bioprocess parameters are essential for maintaining consistency and achieving desired outcomes. Advances in sensor technology and automation allow for precise control of variables such as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen and agitation. This ensures that the bioprocess operates within the optimal range, maximizing product formation and minimizing unwanted byproducts. Bioreactors are vessels where bioprocesses take place and their design has a significant impact on process efficiency. Factors such as reactor type, size and configuration influence mass transfer, mixing and heat transfer. Optimizing bioreactor design involves selecting the most suitable configuration for the specific bioprocess, considering factors like oxygen availability, shear stress and scalability.

Discussion

While bioprocess optimization often focuses on upstream activities, downstream processing is equally crucial. This includes the recovery, purification and formulation of the final product. Optimizing these steps improves product purity and yield, reducing overall production costs. Technologies like chromatography, filtration and centrifugation play a vital role in downstream processing optimization. Mathematical models and computer simulations are powerful tools for understanding and optimizing bioprocesses. These models can predict how changes in various parameters will affect the overall system, enabling researchers to identify optimal conditions without the need for extensive experimentation. Computational tools help in simulating complex biochemical pathways, metabolic fluxes and reactor dynamics [2].

RSM is a statistical technique used to optimize multiple variables simultaneously. It involves designing experiments to explore the effects of different factors and their interactions on the bioprocess. By analysing the responses, researchers can identify the optimal conditions for maximum productivity. RSM is particularly useful when dealing with multiple variables with complex interactions. This approach involves manipulating the entire metabolic network of an organism to enhance specific traits. Genome-scale models predict the effects of genetic modifications on cellular metabolism, guiding the engineering of strains for improved performance. This holistic approach considers the interconnectedness of metabolic pathways, enabling more comprehensive bioprocess optimization [3].

ALE involves subjecting microbial populations to prolonged periods of evolution under specific conditions. Over time, the organisms adapt to the given environment, leading to improved performance. ALE has been successfully applied to enhance traits such as stress tolerance, substrate utilization and product yield. HTS involves the rapid testing of numerous experimental conditions to identify the most favourable ones. This approach accelerates the optimization process by screening a large parameter space in a relatively short time. Automated systems and robotics facilitate the screening of multiple variables, making HTS a valuable tool in bioprocess optimization. The inherent complexity of living organisms poses a significant challenge in bioprocess optimization. Biological systems are dynamic and influenced by intricate networks of genes, proteins and metabolites. Understanding and manipulating these systems to achieve specific outcomes require a deep understanding of molecular biology and genetics [4].

Transitioning from laboratory-scale to industrial-scale bio production introduces challenges related to scalability. Factors such as mass transfer limitations, heat dissipation and reactor dynamics can vary significantly at larger scales. Ensuring that the optimized conditions observed at the laboratory scale can be successfully translated to industrial production is a critical consideration. Biological systems exhibit inherent variability and this variability can impact the reproducibility of bioprocesses. Environmental conditions, genetic drift and other factors can contribute to fluctuations in product yield and quality. Developing strategies to manage and minimize variability is essential for consistent and reliable bio production. Bioprocess optimization in industries such as pharmaceuticals must adhere to strict regulatory standards [5].

Any modifications to the bioprocess, including changes in strains or media, require thorough validation to ensure product safety, efficacy and compliance with regulatory guidelines. This adds complexity to the optimization process, as regulatory considerations must be integrated into the decision-making process. Researchers have optimized the growth medium, fermentation conditions and strain characteristics to enhance insulin production. This has led to more cost-effective and efficient processes for producing this vital pharmaceutical product. The production of bioethanol from yeast, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, involves optimizing fermentation conditions and substrate utilization. Researchers have employed genetic engineering to create strains with improved ethanol tolerance and enhanced metabolic pathways, leading to higher bioethanol yields [6].

Conclusion

Bioprocess optimization is crucial in the production of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using mammalian cell culture. Researchers focus on optimizing cell culture conditions, media composition and bioreactor design to achieve high cell density and antibody productivity. This ensures the cost-effective and consistent production of biopharmaceuticals. Advances in genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics provide a wealth of data for understanding cellular processes at a molecular level. Integrating omics technologies into bioprocess optimization allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the cellular response to different conditions, enabling more targeted and effective strategies.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

1. Lokko, Yvonne, Marc Heijde, Karl Schebesta and Philippe Scholtès, et al. "Biotechnology and the bioeconomy: Towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development." N Biotechnol 40 (2018): 5-10.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Vieira, Helena, Miguel Costa Leal and Ricardo Calado. "Fifty shades of blue: How blue biotechnology is shaping the bioeconomy." Trends Biotechnol 38 (2020): 940-943.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed Ali, Yukihiro Tashiro and Kenji Sonomoto. "Recent advances in lactic acid production by microbial fermentation processes."Biotechnol Adv 31 (2013): 877-902.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Ruiz-Mercado, Gerardo J., Ana Carvalho and Heriberto Cabezas. "Using green chemistry and engineering principles to design, assess and retrofit chemical processes for sustainability." ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4 (2016): 6208-6221.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Berłowska, Joanna, Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska, Maria Balcerek and Urszula Dziekońska-Kubczak, et al. "Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of sugar beet pulp for efficient bioethanol production."Biomed Res Int 2016 (2016).

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Ward, David P., Max Cárdenas-Fernández, Peter Hewitson and Svetlana Ignatova, et al. "Centrifugal partition chromatography in a biorefinery context: Separation of monosaccharides from hydrolysed sugar beet pulp."J Chromatogr A 1411 (2015): 84-91.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at