Osteopathic Treatment: A Holistic Approach to Health and Healing

John Licciardone^*
*Correspondence: John Licciardone, Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA, Email:

Keywords

Osteopathic treatment • Illness • Allopathic

Introduction

The origins of osteopathic treatment can be traced back to the late 19th century. American physician, founded osteopathy in response to the limitations and sometimes harmful practices of conventional medicine during his time. Body’s structure and function were intricately connected, and that disturbances in one area could affect other areas, leading to illness and discomfort. This holistic perspective laid the foundation for osteopathic principles and techniques. Osteopathy operates on the belief that the body has an inherent ability to heal itself. Osteopathic physicians view their role as facilitators of this natural healing process, identifying and removing barriers that hinder optimal functioning. A fundamental principle of osteopathy is the interrelationship between the body's structure and its function [1].

Literature Review

Osteopathic practitioners assess and address structural imbalances, such as misalignments, restrictions, or dysfunctions in bones, muscles, and other tissues, which can impact overall health. Osteopathic treatment takes into consideration the physical, emotional, and environmental factors that contribute to a patient's well-being. By considering the whole person, osteopaths aim to uncover the root causes of ailments and develop comprehensive treatment plans. Osteopathic physicians employ a wide range of manual techniques to diagnose and treat various conditions. These techniques include Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT), which involves gentle manipulation, stretching, and pressure on specific body areas to enhance circulation, alleviate pain, and improve mobility [2].

Discussion

Osteopathy places a strong emphasis on preventive care and education. Osteopathic physicians work with patients to identify potential risk factors and provide guidance on maintaining a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and injury. Osteopathic treatment is applied across a diverse range of medical conditions and patient populations. It is commonly used to manage musculoskeletal issues, such as back pain, joint pain, and sports-related injuries. Osteopathy has also demonstrated effectiveness in treating conditions like migraines, digestive disorders, asthma, and menstrual pain. Additionally, it is often utilized as a complementary approach alongside conventional medical interventions, especially in cases where pain management and functional improvement are key goals. One notable application of osteopathy is in the care of newborns and infants. Pediatric osteopathic treatment focuses on optimizing musculoskeletal development and addressing issues such as colic, torticollis, and feeding difficulties. The gentle and non-invasive nature of osteopathic techniques makes it particularly well-suited for pediatric patients [3].

To become an osteopathic physician, individuals undergo comprehensive medical training that is similar to that of allopathic. Osteopathic medical schools provide education in basic sciences, clinical medicine, and specialized osteopathic principles and techniques. Graduates earn a Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine degree and are eligible to obtain medical licenses, practice medicine, and prescribe medication. Osteopathic physicians are subject to the same rigorous licensing and regulatory standards as their allopathic counterparts. They can specialize in various medical disciplines, such as family medicine, internal medicine, surgery, and more. The integration of osteopathy into mainstream healthcare systems varies by region, with some countries having a well-established presence of osteopathic physicians as primary care providers. While osteopathic treatment has gained acceptance and credibility, it has also faced some criticism and scepticism [4].

Osteopathic treatment represents a holistic and patient-centered approach to health and healing. With its origins in the late 19^th century, this branch of medicine has evolved to encompass a wide range of manual techniques and principles that address the body's interconnectedness, self-healing abilities, and structural balance. Osteopathic treatment is particularly valued for its application in musculoskeletal issues, pediatric care, and as a complementary therapy alongside conventional medicine.While osteopathy has gained recognition and acceptance, ongoing research, standardized training, and clear communication of its benefits and limitations are essential to ensure its continued growth and integration within modern healthcare systems. As medical knowledge and practices continue to evolve, osteopathic treatment remains a valuable option for individuals seeking a comprehensive and holistic approach to their health and well-being [5,6].

Conclusion

Some critics question the scientific basis of certain osteopathic techniques and argue that more research is needed to establish their efficacy. Additionally, concerns have been raised about inconsistent quality among osteopathic practitioners and the potential for misdiagnosis or delayed treatment. Controversies have also arisen regarding the use of osteopathic manipulation in treating certain conditions. Critics argue that some practitioners may make unsubstantiated claims about the benefits of osteopathy for conditions like asthma or autism, which can lead to false hope and ineffective treatment.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Hanna, Ashraf, Bishoy Abraham, Andrew Hanna and Adam J. Smith. "Effects of intravenous ketamine in a patient with post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome." Int Med Case Rep J (2017): 305-308.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Alvarez-Manzo, Hector S., Yumin Zhang, Wanliang Shi and Ying Zhang. "Evaluation of disulfiram drug combinations and identification of other more effective combinations against stationary phase B. burgdorferi." Antibiotics 9 (2020): 542.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Trautmann, Alain, Hugues Gascan and Raouf Ghozzi. "Potential patient-reported toxicities with disulfiram treatment in late disseminated Lyme disease." Front Med (2020): 133.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Goodlet, Kellie J. and Kathleen A. Fairman. "Adverse events associated with antibiotics and intravenous therapies for post–Lyme disease syndrome in a commercially insured sample." Clin Infect Dis 67 (2018): 1568-1574.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Holzbauer, Stacy M., Melissa M. Kemperman and Ruth Lynfield. "Death due to community-associated C. difficile in a woman receiving prolonged antibiotic therapy for suspected Lyme disease." Clin Infect Dis 51 (2010): 369-370.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Klempner, Mark S., Linden T. Hu, Janine Evans and Christopher H. Schmid, et al. "Two controlled trials of antibiotic treatment in patients with persistent symptoms and a history of Lyme disease." N Engl J Med 345 (2001): 85-92.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at