GET THE APP

Parkinson Disease Spine Instrumentation, a Chronicle of a Death Foretold
..

Journal of Spine

ISSN: 2165-7939

Open Access

Case Report - (2023) Volume 12, Issue 5

Parkinson Disease Spine Instrumentation, a Chronicle of a Death Foretold

Fernando José Rodas Montenegro*, Cesar A. Moreno Villegas, Leonel Ramírez Abrego, Francisco Javier Sánchez, Jorge Alberto De Haro, Alejandro Tejera Morett, Francisco Cruz López and H. Michael Dittmar Johnson
*Correspondence: Fernando José Rodas Montenegro, Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, Hightstown, New Jersey, USA, Email:
Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, Hightstown, New Jersey, USA

Received: 03-Oct-2023, Manuscript No. jsp-23-116087; Editor assigned: 05-Oct-2023, Pre QC No. P-116087; Reviewed: 17-Oct-2023, QC No. Q-116087; Revised: 23-Oct-2023, Manuscript No. R-116087; Published: 30-Oct-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2165-7939.2023.12.613
Citation: Montenegro, Fernando José Rodas, Cesar A. Moreno Villegas, Leonel Ramírez Abrego and Francisco Javier Sánchez, et al. “Parkinson disease Spine Instrumentation, a Chronicle of a Death Foretold.” J Spine 12 (2023): 613.
Copyright: © 2018 Zeedan GSG, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

A 75-year-old male with history of medically controlled Arterial Hypertension (AH) and Parkinson Disease (PD), reporting Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Lumbar Stenosis. Underwent for coronal deformity correction and lumbar stenosis decompression. An immediate successful radiological and clinical outcome, but six weeks after surgical intervention patient with thoracic pain, x-rays showed a fracture of the upper instrumented vertebra. Due to multimorbidity we decided conservative treatment, expecting consolidation. Nevertheless, after 5 months of conservative treatment without bone consolidation, he underwent for a re-intervention, making a transition from a rigid to a semi-rigid spine instrumentation. The purpose of this article is to show how challenging is a combination of PD with Degenerative Spine Disease.

Keywords

Parkinson disease • Spinal surgery • PJK • PJF • Neuromuscular disease surgery

Introduction

PD is the second most common neurodegenerative condition, with an estimated prevalence of 0.3% [1,2]. Postural deformities are common in this disease, being two types the most important: 1) sagittal plane (camptocormia and antecollis), and 2) coronal plane (Pisa syndrome and scoliosis). Coronal deformity has a coronal deviation of the trunk, that resolves after being in supine [3]. Those types of deformities could have myelopathy or radiculopathy1. Degenerative spondyloarthropathy, thoracolumbar scoliosis and cervical deformity, are the most common degenerative spine problems in PD [4]. Consider that PD patients are susceptible to osteoporosis, due to: 1) low bone mechanic stress due to low mobility, 2) vitamin D deficiency, 3) low body weight, and 4) hiperhomocysteinemia [5,6]. But, which is the appropriate asses of a degenerative spine disease with PD? Do we have to fix it or not? Well, depends on each case. First, analyzed the severity of PD by a modified scale of Hoehn and Yahr [7,8], and then determined the best option.

Case Presentation

A 75-year-old male with history of medically controlled AH and PD, with low-back-pain radiating to both limbs, predominantly to the left. Tendency to a positive balance gait and left coronal deviation. X-rays showed a degenerative lumbar scoliosis with 40o of Cobb angle (Figure 1). Underwent a posterior spine fusion from T9 to Iliac bones, plus lumbar stenosis decompression. Postoperative x-rays and clinical evaluation were successful (Figure 2). After six weeks, he was in great pain localized in thoracic spine due to movement, and x-ray control showed a fracture of the Upper Instrumented Vertebra (UIV) with Regional Kyphosis Angle (RKA) of 30.6o (Figure 3). Due to multimorbidity, treatment choice was conservative with analgesic medication and Taylor Brace. After three months, still with thoracic pain. Supine x-ray with RKA of 23.2o, and standing x-ray RKA of 46.3o (Figure 4); patient was not agree for a revision surgery, so we continued with conservative treatment. Four months after surgery was performed a computed tomography (CT), with a 75% lysis of T9 and inferior platform of T8 affected (Figure 5). After five months from the first surgery, patient accepted a revision surgery. Extension of instrumentation was performed by the following way: removed of T9 screws, transpedicular screw were placed in T7, T6 and T5; transverse process hooks were used in T4 and T3. Due to a bone cavity, a vertebroplasty was performed in T9 for anterior stability. The length of the previous rod was extended, using an endto- end connector to the most cephalad segment where transpedicular screw were placed, and a reinforcement rod to the vertebroplasty using a side-to-side connector between T9 to T3 (Figure 6). After six weeks of surgical treatment, patient with an adequate clinical and radiological outcome.

spine-scoliosis

Figure 1. A) AP x-ray with degenerative lumbar scoliosis a L4 apex and 40º Cobb angle, L3-L4 and L4-L5 laterolisthesis and B) Axial traction x-ray, showing reduction of scoliosis up to 31.4º.

spine-immediate

Figure 2. A, B) Immediate post-operative x-ray control.

spine-fracture

Figure 3. Six weeks post-operative x-ray control. A) Coronal adequate correction, B) Kyphosis cephalad to the upper instrumented vertebra and C, D) Evidence of fracture of T9, with a RKA of 30.6º.

spine-standing

Figure 4. A) Supine x-ray RKA of 23.2º and B) Standing x-ray RKA of 46.3º.

spine-bone-cavity

Figure 5. A) Right foraminal view and B) Left foraminal view. On both sides, evidence of a bone cavity localized in the upper instrumented vertebra, included lysis of the inferior platform of T8.

spine-connector

Figure 6. Immediate post-operative control x-ray. A) Coronal view and B) Sagittal view. Both views showing a prolonged rod to the upper transpedicular screw, using an end-toend connector. While an anterior reinforcement with vertebroplasty and a rod connecting T9 to T3, using a side-to-side connector.

Results and Discussion

Process of selecting an adequate option is complex, as it is to determine up to the level to fuse. Satisfactory surgical outcome is about 63% and 45% required a re-intervention [1]. As is known, kyphosis and instability progression of the adjacent segment, is the path for a failed treatment [9]. Thoracic spine is divided in two parts, a rigid (T1-T7) and a semi-rigid (T8-T12), so stopping in a semi-mobile segment could affect the development of the fusion. Most common post-surgical complications of thoracic fusion are the Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) and the Proximal Junctional Failure (PJF), risks factors that influenced on this are osteoporosis and neuromuscular disorder (both in this case) [10,11]. Prevalence of PJK after and Adult Deformity Spine surgery (ADS) is about 17-39% [12,13]. Decision making of instrumentation extension is complex, since is not only one more surgery, but establish the level and type of construction. Vertebroplasty for PJK prevention has an unconcluded evidence [14,15]. The construction option selected for treatment of the PJF was to prevent a posterior PJK. Using a doble rod on the unstable segment plus an anterior support with vertebroplasty, and then a semi-rigid transition to the upper level using the transverse process hooks [16-18]. We also recommend the algorithm proposed by Schroeder, to treat spinal deformation with PD [19,20].

Conclusion

Decision making to treat spine degenerative condition with PD is complicated, nevertheless, it is well known that a multidisciplinary team must be involved. Combination of both types of illness (degenerative spine condition and PD) and a PJF complication, semi-rigid construction transition and vertebroplasty reinforcement gave and adequate stability to the spine in this case.

References

  1. Sarkiss, Christopher A., Guy A. Fogg, Branko Skovrlj and Samuel K. Cho, et al. "To operate or not?: A literature review of surgical outcomes in 95 patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing spine surgery." Clin Neurol Neurosurg 134 (2015): 122-125.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Hayes, Michael T. "Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism." Am J Med 132 (2019): 802-807.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Doherty, Karen M., Bart P. van de Warrenburg, Maria Cecilia Peralta and Laura Silveira-Moriyama, et al. "Postural deformities in Parkinson's disease." Lancet Neurol 10 (2011): 538-549.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Watanabe, Gina, Paolo Palmisciano, Andie Conching and Christian Ogasawara, et al. "Degenerative spine surgery in patients with Parkinson ’s disease: A systematic review." World Neurosurg (2022).

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Van Den Bos, Frederiek, Arlene D. Speelman, Monique Samson and Marten Munneke, et al. "Parkinson's disease and osteoporosis." Age Ageing 42 (2013): 156-162.

    Google Scholar

  6. Behl, Tapan, Arpita Arora, Rajeev K. Singla and Aayush Sehgal, et al. "Understanding the role of" sunshine vitamin D" in Parkinson’s disease: A review." Front Pharmacol 13 (2022): 993033.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Puvanesarajah, Varun, Amit Jain, Rabia Qureshi and S. Evan Carstensen, et al. "Elective thoracolumbar spine fusion surgery in patients with Parkinson disease." World Neurosurg 96 (2016): 267-271.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  8. Galeoto, G., A. Berardi, F. Colalelli and E. Pelosin, et al. "Correlation between quality of Life and severity of Parkinson’s disease by assessing an optimal cut-off point on the Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39) as related to the Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale." Clin Ter 173 (2022).

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Babat, L. Brett, Robert F. McLain, William Bingaman and Iain Kalfas, et al. "Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Construct failure and progressive deformity." Spine 29 (2004): 2006-2012.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  10. Prablek, Marc, John McGinnis, Sebastian J. Winocour and Edward M. Reece, et al. "Failures in thoracic spinal fusions and their management." In Seminars in Plastic Surgery 35 (2021): 020-024.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Han, Xuexin and Jiabin Ren. "Risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after correction surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis." Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 56 (2022): 158.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  12. Yoshida, Go, Hiroki Ushirozako, Tomohiko Hasegawa and Yu Yamato, et al. "Preoperative and postoperative sitting radiographs for adult spinal deformity surgery: upper instrumented vertebra selection using sitting C2 plumb line distance to prevent proximal junctional kyphosis." Spine 45 (2020): E950-E958.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  13. Shlobin, Nathan A., Nancy Le, Justin K. Scheer and Lee A. Tan. "State of the evidence for proximal junctional kyphosis prevention in adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review of current literature." World Neurosurg 161 (2022): 179-189.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  14. Rahmani, Roman, Milo Sanda, Erin Sheffels and Amy Singleton, et al. "The efficacy of prophylactic vertebroplasty for preventing proximal junctional complications after spinal fusion: A systematic review." J Spine 22 (2022): 2050-2058.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  15. Han, Sanghyun, Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim and Tae-Ahn Jahng, et al. "Effect of vertebroplasty at the upper instrumented vertebra and upper instrumented vertebra+ 1 for prevention of proximal junctional failure in adult spinal deformity surgery: A comparative matched-cohort study." World Neurosurg 124 (2019): e436-e444.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  16. Lange, Tobias, Werner Schmoelz, Georg Gosheger and Martin Eichinger, et al. "Is a gradual reduction of stiffness on top of posterior instrumentation possible with a suitable proximal implant? A biomechanical study." J Spine 17 (2017): 1148-1155.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  17. Dubousset, Jean and Bassel G. Diebo. "Proximal junctional kyphosis in modern spine surgery: Why is it so common?." Spine Surg Relat Res 7 (2023): 120-128.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  18. Doodkorte, Remco JP, Timon FG Vercoulen, Alex K. Roth and Rob A. de Bie, et al. "Instrumentation techniques to prevent proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure in adult spinal deformity correction: A systematic review of biomechanical studies." J Spine 21 (2021): 842-854.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  19. Vercoulen, Timon FG, Remco JP Doodkorte, Alex Roth and Rob de Bie, et al. "Instrumentation techniques to prevent proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure in adult spinal deformity correction: A systematic review of clinical studies." Global Spine J 12 (2022): 1282-1296.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  20. Schroeder, Joshua E., Alexander Hughes, Andrew Sama and Joseph Weinstein, et al. "Lumbar spine surgery in patients with Parkinson disease." JBJS 97 (2015): 1661-1666.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2022

Journal of Spine received 2022 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Spine peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward