Pediatric Oncology: The Role of Personalized Treatment Plans

Tomasz Chaber^*
*Correspondence: Tomasz Chaber, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rzeszow, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland, Email:

Introduction

Pediatric oncology is a specialized field of medicine dedicated to diagnosing and treating cancer in children, adolescents, and young adults. Unlike adult cancers, pediatric cancers are often characterized by distinct biological behaviours and patterns of progression. While the overall survival rate for pediatric cancers has improved dramatically over the past few decades due to advances in treatment, the complexity and diversity of childhood cancers require a more nuanced and individualized approach to treatment. Personalized treatment plans, also known as precision medicine, have emerged as a key component in enhancing therapeutic efficacy and minimizing toxicity in pediatric oncology.

Description

Historically, the treatment of childhood cancer was based on broad protocols that applied a one-size-fits-all approach, focusing on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. However, this method, though effective for many children, often resulted in significant side effects and long-term complications. These therapies, which were initially designed based on adult cancer biology, did not always account for the unique genetic makeup, molecular features, or developmental aspects of pediatric cancers. As a result, children with cancer could experience not only the immediate adverse effects of treatment but also long-term issues such as cognitive deficits, growth abnormalities, and secondary cancers. This led to the growing recognition of the need for more tailored therapeutic strategies [1].

The advent of personalized medicine has revolutionized cancer treatment by offering the possibility of selecting therapies based on the specific characteristics of an individual’s disease. Personalized treatment plans take into account various factors, including the genetic mutations or alterations present in the tumor, the molecular signature of the cancer, and even the patient’s individual response to certain drugs. In pediatric oncology, these factors can significantly differ from those in adult cancers, underscoring the importance of developing pediatric-specific personalized therapies. One of the cornerstones of personalized pediatric oncology is the use of genomic profiling, a technique that allows for a detailed understanding of the genetic alterations within a tumor. Advances in sequencing technologies, such as Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), have made it possible to rapidly and comprehensively analyze the genetic and epigenetic makeup of pediatric cancers. This allows clinicians to identify specific mutations that may drive the cancer’s growth and provide potential targets for treatment [2].

For instance, some pediatric cancers, such as certain types of leukemia or neuroblastoma, are associated with genetic mutations that can be specifically targeted with drugs designed to inhibit the mutated proteins. In cases where genetic alterations are identified, clinicians can choose therapies that are directly aimed at these abnormalities, potentially offering better outcomes with fewer side effects compared to traditional treatments. The molecular profile of a tumor not only reveals the genetic mutations involved but also helps in predicting how the cancer will respond to different therapies. This is particularly important in pediatric cancers, which can exhibit a wide range of molecular characteristics, even within the same type of cancer. For example, medulloblastoma, a common brain tumor in children, is composed of several distinct molecular subgroups, each with different prognoses and responses to treatment. By using molecular profiling, oncologists can classify tumors more accurately and design treatment plans that are tailored to the specific subgroup, improving survival rates and minimizing unnecessary treatments [3].

In addition to genetic profiling, the development of targeted therapies has played a pivotal role in advancing personalized medicine in pediatric oncology. Targeted therapies are drugs that interfere with specific molecules involved in the growth and spread of cancer cells. Unlike traditional chemotherapy, which indiscriminately targets rapidly dividing cells, targeted therapies focus on particular pathways or proteins that are mutated or overexpressed in cancer cells. This approach has proven to be more effective and less toxic in many cases. For instance, the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treating leukemia has shown significant promise. These drugs work by inhibiting the activity of abnormal proteins that promote leukemia cell proliferation, offering a more specific and less harmful alternative to conventional chemotherapy [4,5].

Furthermore, the use of immunotherapy has shown great promise in pediatric oncology, offering a new frontier for personalized treatment. Immunotherapy harnesses the power of the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells. In pediatric cancers, immunotherapies such as checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T-cell therapy are being increasingly explored. CAR T-cell therapy, for example, involves modifying a patient’s own T-cells to recognize and attack cancer cells more effectively. While these therapies have demonstrated remarkable success in certain pediatric cancers, such As Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), their implementation requires a thorough understanding of the tumor’ s molecular profile, as well as careful management of potential side effects. Personalized treatment plans allow oncologists to assess the likelihood of a patient’s response to these therapies and select the most appropriate course of action.

Despite the tremendous promise of personalized treatment, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed to fully integrate precision medicine into pediatric oncology. One of the primary challenges is the heterogeneity of pediatric cancers. Even within the same tumor type, there can be significant variations in genetic alterations, making it difficult to develop universal treatment protocols. Additionally, the biology of childhood cancers is often complex and not yet fully understood, meaning that not all genetic alterations may have clear therapeutic implications. Furthermore, the rarity of many pediatric cancers means that there may be limited clinical data on how certain targeted therapies or immunotherapies perform in children. As a result, ongoing research and clinical trials are essential to expanding the knowledge base and improving treatment options.

Conclusion

In conclusion, personalized treatment plans represent a significant advancement in pediatric oncology, offering the potential for more effective and less toxic therapies. By tailoring treatment to the individual characteristics of the tumor and the patient, personalized medicine can improve survival rates, reduce long-term complications, and enhance the quality of life for children with cancer. However, to fully realize the benefits of personalized medicine, further research is needed to expand our understanding of the genetic and molecular landscape of pediatric cancers. Additionally, efforts to improve accessibility, reduce costs, and foster collaboration among multidisciplinary teams will be key in ensuring that all children with cancer have access to the most innovative and effective treatments available. Personalized treatment in pediatric oncology is not just a trend but a fundamental shift toward more precise, patient-centered care that holds the promise of transforming the future of childhood cancer treatment.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

1. Bailey, Regan L., Keith P. West Jr and Robert E. Black. "The epidemiology of global micronutrient deficiencies." Ann Nutr Metab 66 (2015): 22-33.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Kassebaum, Nicholas J., Rashmi Jasrasaria, Mohsen Naghavi and Sarah K. Wulf, et al. "A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from 1990 to 2010." Blood 123 (2014): 615-624.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Van der Merwe, Liandré F. and Simone R. Eussen. "Iron status of young children in Europe." Am J Clin Nutr 106 (2017): 1663S-1671S.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Sekhar, Deepa L., Laura E. Murray-Kolb, Allen R. Kunselman and Carol S. Weisman, et al. "Association between menarche and iron deficiency in non-anemic young women." PLoS One 12 (2017): e0177183.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Manceau, Hana, Jérome Ausseil, Damien Masson and Jean-Paul Feugeas, et al. "Neglected comorbidity of chronic heart failure: Iron deficiency." Nutrients 14 (2022): 3214.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at