GET THE APP

Phenomenology of Arch Actuated Quantum Gravity Impacts
..

Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology

ISSN: 2329-6542

Open Access

Brief Report - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 3

Phenomenology of Arch Actuated Quantum Gravity Impacts

Luis Santos*
*Correspondence: Luis Santos, Department of Chemistry and Physics, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa, Brazil, Email:
Department of Chemistry and Physics, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa, Brazil

Received: 01-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. jaat-22-58700; Editor assigned: 03-Mar-2022, Pre QC No. P- 58700; Reviewed: 15-Mar-2022, QC No. Q- 58700; Revised: 19-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. R- 58700; Published: 26-Mar-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/ 2329-6542.22.10.201
Citation: Santos, Luis. “Phenomenology of Arch Actuated Quantum Gravity Impacts.” J Astrophys Aerospace Technol 10 (2022): 201.
Copyright: © 2022 Santos L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

A few examinations have been dedicated to the likelihood that quantum gravity could unmistakably influence relativistic kinematics for particles proliferating from far off astrophysical sources to our telescopes, yet the significant writing has up to this point zeroed in solely on a subclass of situations with the end goal that the quantum-gravity impacts are free of (naturally visible) arch [1]. It was accepted that a phenomenology for quantum-gravity impacts that are set off by shape may be an impasse in light of a twofold concealment by the littleness of the trademark quantum-gravity length scale and by the diminutiveness of curve.

Description

This situation is turning out to be progressively unsuitable considering some new quantum-gravity studies giving proof of the way that the presence of ebb and flow may be expected to have the clever relativistic properties [2]. We here investigate an unequivocal situation for bend incited quantumgravity impacts, and show that the littleness of arch doesn't represent a test for phenomenology since it is remunerated by the huge distances went by the particles considered in the pertinent phenomenological review [3]. We additionally see that the current information circumstance for particles spreading from far off astrophysical sources to our telescopes, while uncertain, gives more support to our ebb and flow incited impacts than for the bend free impacts that were up until this point contemplated [4].

We will before long arrive at an entire century of hypothetical exploration on the quantum-gravity issue, since the main such investigations date back to the mid-1930s yet the advancement of a quantum-gravity phenomenology is just rather later yet centers around not very many open doors. This timetable befuddle is because of the frightening diminutiveness of the Planck length, the scale expected to be normal for quantum-gravity impacts, which just in extremely intriguing observational circumstances could prompt an unmistakable engraving in information. The most concentrated on chance of this sort concerns the likelihood that the laws of relativistic kinematics may be distorted by quantum gravity, in manners that could leave a follow in the investigation of Gamma-beam Explodes (GRBs). Since GRBs are obtained at exceptionally huge distances (regularly at redshift somewhere in the range of 0.5 and 4) the moment quantum-gravity impacts could collect to noticeably enormous size en route [5].

Considering the interesting open door that these GRB review give, an enormous writing has been dedicated to them however this large number of review have zeroed in on a subclass of situations with the end goal that the quantum-gravity impacts continue even without any (naturally visible) arch.

Conclusion

This manages the cost of a few specialized rearrangements, and it was up until this point expected that in any case a phenomenology of quantum-gravity impacts that are set off by bend would be miserable, since it would need to confront not just the diminutiveness of the trademark length size of quantumgravity yet in addition the littleness of shape. In any case, on the hypothesis side one tracks down very some inspiration for considering quantum-gravity impacts that are set off by ebb and flow: for instance, models of quantum spacetime in light of Hopf algebras ordinarily produce a component to such an extent that the presence of quantum-gravity impacts requires bend, with the chance of shape free quantum-gravity impacts emerging just at the expense of a few sizeable adjusting and a few lines of investigation in view of the circle quantum-gravity viewpoint propose that the significant quantum-gravity impacts should be set off by arch.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

  1. Monserrat, Javier. "Neural networks and quantum neurology: a speculative heuristic towards the formal architecture of psychism." Nat Comput 8 (2009): 645-661.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Hess, Tracey Lee. “Consciousness and quantum physics: Freud's death instinct and the phenomenology of Corbin's mundus imaginalis manifested as a complex fractal in epilepsy.” Pacifica Graduate Institute (2004).
  4. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  5. Gallagher, Shaun. "Rethinking nature: Phenomenology and a non-reductionist cognitive science." Australas J Philos 2 (2018): 125-137.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Rideout, David, Thomas Jennewein and Adrian Kent.et al. "Fundamental quantum optics experiments conceivable with satellites-reaching relativistic distances and velocities." Classical and Quantum Gravity 29 (2012): 224011.
  8. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  9. Tamulevicius, S., A. Galdikas, and L. Pranevicius. "Elementary processes in thin film formation stimulated by high energy ion irradiation." vac 45 (1994): 1221-1225.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward