Physical Image Quality Metrics for the Evaluation of X-ray Systems Used in Fluoroscopy-guided Pediatric Cardiac Interventional Procedures

Ubeda Verdun^*
*Correspondence: Ubeda Verdun, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, 4-22-1 Ikeda, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan, Email:

Keywords

X-ray systems • Fluoroscopy • Pediatric cardiac interventions • Image quality metrics • Spatial resolution • Radiation dose

Introduction

Fluoroscopy-guided pediatric cardiac interventional procedures rely heavily on real-time X-ray imaging to visualize intricate cardiac anatomy and guide catheter-based interventions. The quality of X-ray images plays a critical role in the success of these procedures, as it directly impacts the accuracy of device placement, procedural efficiency and patient safety. To evaluate and optimize the performance of X-ray systems used in pediatric cardiac interventions, a thorough understanding of physical image quality metrics is essential. This article explores the significance of various quantitative parameters in assessing image quality and guiding technological advancements in pediatric cardiac fluoroscopy. Spatial resolution refers to the ability of an X-ray imaging system to distinguish between two adjacent structures or details in an image. In pediatric cardiac interventions, high spatial resolution is crucial for visualizing small anatomical structures, such as coronary arteries and cardiac chambers, as well as for accurately assessing device positioning and deployment. Physical image quality metrics, such as line pairs per millimeter (lp/mm) or Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), quantitatively evaluate spatial resolution and help optimize system performance to achieve optimal image sharpness and detail.

Noise in X-ray images can degrade image quality and obscure important anatomical details, particularly in low-dose fluoroscopy settings common in pediatric patients. Understanding noise characteristics, such as quantum noise and electronic noise, is essential for optimizing image quality while minimizing radiation dose. Metrics such as Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and Noise Power Spectrum (NPS) provide quantitative measures of image noise, guiding the selection of acquisition parameters and image processing techniques to mitigate noise artifacts and enhance image clarity. Contrast-to-noise ratio quantifies the relative difference in signal intensity between anatomical structures of interest and background noise in an X-ray image. In pediatric cardiac interventions, maintaining adequate CNR is crucial for delineating soft tissue structures, visualizing contrast-filled vessels, and guiding device placement with precision. Optimizing acquisition parameters, such as beam energy and filtration, as well as employing advanced image processing algorithms, can improve CNR and enhance image quality without compromising radiation safety [1].

Literature Review

Minimizing radiation dose exposure is paramount in pediatric cardiac interventions to mitigate the risk of radiation-induced adverse effects, such as tissue damage and carcinogenesis. Physical image quality metrics, such as Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK), Dose-Area Product (DAP) and Peak Skin Dose (PSD), quantify radiation dose delivered to patients during fluoroscopy procedures. By optimizing imaging protocols, collimation techniques and dose reduction strategies, healthcare providers can achieve the delicate balance between image quality and radiation safety in pediatric cardiac interventions. Physical image quality metrics play a critical role in evaluating and optimizing X-ray systems used in fluoroscopy-guided pediatric cardiac interventional procedures. By understanding and implementing spatial resolution, noise characteristics, contrast-to-noise ratio, and radiation dose metrics, healthcare providers can ensure high-quality imaging while minimizing radiation exposure to pediatric patients. Continual advancements in technology and image processing techniques hold promise for further enhancing image quality and patient safety in pediatric cardiac interventions. A comprehensive understanding of physical image quality metrics is essential for achieving optimal procedural outcomes and improving the overall quality of care in pediatric cardiology [2].

In addition to understanding and optimizing physical image quality metrics, advanced image processing techniques play a pivotal role in enhancing the visualization of cardiac structures and devices during fluoroscopy-guided pediatric interventions. Sophisticated noise reduction algorithms, such as iterative reconstruction and adaptive filtering, can effectively suppress noise artifacts while preserving image details. By minimizing noise, these algorithms improve image clarity and facilitate accurate interpretation of anatomical structures, particularly in low-dose fluoroscopy settings. Image contrast enhancement techniques, such as histogram equalization and contrast stretching, enhance the visibility of subtle anatomical features and contrast differences. By adjusting the distribution of pixel intensities, these techniques improve the delineation of cardiac chambers, vessels, and implanted devices, aiding in procedural planning and device placement. Edge enhancement algorithms highlight boundaries between different anatomical structures, making them more visually distinct and facilitating accurate catheter navigation and device positioning. By enhancing edge sharpness, these techniques improve spatial localization and reduce the risk of procedural errors during pediatric cardiac interventions [3].

Motion compensation algorithms mitigate the blurring effect caused by patient motion or cardiac motion during fluoroscopy-guided procedures. By tracking and compensating for motion artifacts in real-time, these techniques maintain image sharpness and minimize the impact of motion-related distortions, ensuring consistent image quality throughout the procedure. While fluoroscopy remains the primary imaging modality for real-time guidance during pediatric cardiac interventions, the integration of complementary 3D imaging modalities, such as rotational angiography and cardiac computed tomography (CT), offers additional anatomical information and enhances procedural planning and device navigation. By combining 3D volumetric datasets with live fluoroscopy images, clinicians can accurately visualize complex cardiac anatomy, assess device positioning in three dimensions, and optimize procedural outcomes with greater precision [4].

Discussion

Quantitative image analysis tools, such as quantitative angiography and 3D reconstruction software, enable objective assessment of anatomical dimensions, vessel morphology and device characteristics during pediatric cardiac interventions. By quantifying parameters such as vessel diameter, stenosis severity and device apposition, these tools provide valuable insights into procedural success and facilitate optimal treatment planning and follow-up care. Incorporating advanced image processing techniques, integrating 3D imaging modalities and leveraging quantitative image analysis tools are essential strategies for optimizing image quality and enhancing procedural outcomes in fluoroscopy-guided pediatric cardiac interventions. By combining technological advancements with a comprehensive understanding of physical image quality metrics, healthcare providers can achieve superior visualization of cardiac structures and devices, improve procedural accuracy and ensure the highest standards of patient care in pediatric cardiology. Continued research and innovation in imaging technology and image processing algorithms hold promise for further advancing the field and optimizing patient outcomes in pediatric cardiac interventions [5].

AI and ML algorithms offer promising opportunities for enhancing image quality, automating image analysis and optimizing procedural workflows in pediatric cardiac interventions. These algorithms can analyze large volumes of imaging data, identify patterns, and provide actionable insights to clinicians, leading to more efficient procedural planning, precise device placement, and personalized patient care. AI-based applications, such as automated device detection, image segmentation and radiation dose prediction, have the potential to streamline workflow, improve procedural efficiency and enhance patient outcomes in pediatric cardiac interventions. Patient-specific modeling and simulation techniques enable clinicians to create virtual representations of individual patient anatomy, simulate procedural scenarios and optimize treatment strategies prior to performing fluoroscopy-guided interventions. By integrating imaging data with computational models, clinicians can anticipate anatomical variations, plan optimal device trajectories and minimize radiation exposure while maximizing procedural success. Patient-specific modeling and simulation offer valuable insights into complex cardiac anatomy, device interactions and procedural complexities, ultimately improving outcomes and reducing risks in pediatric cardiac interventions [6].

Conclusion

Incorporating real-time feedback systems, AI and ML applications, patient-specific modeling and simulation techniques, interdisciplinary collaboration, and comprehensive training programs are integral to optimizing image quality and enhancing procedural safety in fluoroscopy-guided pediatric cardiac interventions. By leveraging advanced technologies, fostering collaboration among multidisciplinary teams, and prioritizing ongoing education and training, healthcare providers can deliver high-quality care, minimize radiation exposure, and improve outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac interventions. Continued innovation, research, and knowledge-sharing are essential for advancing the field of pediatric interventional cardiology and ensuring the best possible outcomes for pediatric cardiac patients.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Ubeda, Carlos, Luisa Salazar, Viviana Retana and Freddy Santos, et al. "Characterization and experimental measurements of scatter dose at cardiologist's eyes during paediatric interventional cardiology procedures in Costa Rica." Radiat Prot Dosim 176 (2017): 450-455.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Azizmohammadi, Fariba, Inaki Navarro Castellanos, Joaquim Miró and Paul Segars, et al. "Generative learning approach for radiation dose reduction in X‐ray guided cardiac interventions." Med Phys 49 (2022): 4071-4081.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Page, Matthew J., Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt and Isabelle Boutron, et al. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews." Bmj 372 (2021).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Lamers, Luke J., Brian H. Morray, Alan Nugent and Michael Speidel, et al. "Multicenter assessment of radiation exposure during pediatric cardiac catheterizations using a novel imaging system." J Interv Cardiol 2019 (2019).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Verdun, F. R., D. Racine, J. G. Ott and M. J. Tapiovaara, et al. "Image quality in CT: From physical measurements to model observers." Phys Med 31 (2015): 823-843.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Huda, Walter, Anthony M. Sajewicz, Kent M. Ogden and David R. Dance. "Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system." Med Phys 30 (2003): 442-448.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at