GET THE APP

Predictors of Graft Success in Recipients of Renal Transplants who Experience Antibody-mediated Rejection
..

Transplantation Technologies & Research

ISSN: 2161-0991

Open Access

Review Article - (2022) Volume 12, Issue 4

Predictors of Graft Success in Recipients of Renal Transplants who Experience Antibody-mediated Rejection

Vural Yilmaz*
*Correspondence: Vural Yilmaz, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey, Email:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey

Received: 25-May-2022, Manuscript No. jttr-22-72210; Editor assigned: 27-May-2022, Pre QC No. P-72210; Reviewed: 04-Jun-2022, QC No. Q-72210; Revised: 11-Jun-2022, Manuscript No. R-72210; Published: 18-Jun-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2161-0991.2022.12.213
Citation: Yilmaz, Vural. “Predictors of Graft Success in Recipients of Renal Transplants who Experience Antibody-mediated Rejection.” J Transplant Technol Res 12 (2022): 213.
Copyright: © 2022 Yilmaz V. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

AMR, or active and persistent antibody-mediated rejection, is a frequent reason for graft failure. The prognostic indicators for this condition are unclear. Our goal was to identify the demographic, histological and clinical characteristics of transplant recipients who had AMR and to assess how these traits and antirejection therapy options affected graft survival.

Keywords

Renal transplantation • Antibody-mediated rejection • Graft survival

Introduction

AMR, or active and persistent antibody-mediated rejection, is a frequent reason for graft failure. According to earlier research, the incidence of AMR might range from 5.6% to 23%. AMR often happens in response to donor HLA antigens and seldom to non-HLA antigens. The updated Banff 2017 classification of the ABMR includes conditions related to donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte (HLA) or non-HLA antigens, active and chronic active AMR, histological evidence of acute and chronic damage, recent antibody interaction with the vascular endothelium and more. DSAs are produced as a result of B cell and plasma cell activation and bind to HLA or non-HLA molecules expressed on renal allograft endothelial cells. Peritubular capillaritis, glomerulitis and a fast reduction in allograft function are all caused by active AMR [1].

Description

Chronic AMR causes a steady deterioration in kidney function and histologically appears as transplant glomerulopathy. The three main criteria for diagnosing AMR are the presence of circulating DSAs, histological evidence of acute-chronic tissue damage and evidence of antibody interaction with vascular endothelium (peritubular capillary C4d accumulation). In several investigations, it has been demonstrated that in patients with AMR, peritubular c4d staining, DSA and pathological findings are related. After a diagnosis, the therapy for AMR is based on 2 fundamental mechanisms: the suppression of B cells or plasma cells and the elimination of donor-specific antibodies. In the current study, we sought to identify the demographic, histological and clinical characteristics of transplant recipients who had AMR and to assess the influence of these traits on graft survival in relation to antirejection therapy modalities.

De novo DSA from underimmunosuppression, glomerulitis and/or peritubular capillary (PTC) inflammation (MVI), C4d deposition and persistent morphologic alterations, such as transplant TG and multilamination of PTC basement membranes, are characteristics of late-onset AMR. On silver staining, activated glomerular capillary endothelial cells create "double contours" by enlarging the subendothelial area with fibrillary and neomembrane material. A reliable and precise pathologic diagnosis of chronic AMR is required. AMR was underdiagnosed in the early Banff schema and misdiagnosed as T cellmediated rejection as a result of aberrant endothelial transcript expression in "C4d-negative" rejection (using diffuse C4dptc3 threshold) [2]. Iteratively lowering the C4dptc thresholds to "focal" C4d2 (10%–50% for immunofluorescence) and "minimum" C4d1 (1%–9% for immunoperoxidase) and adding MVI8 increased sensitivity and decreased false-negative findings, but histologic AMR without DSA or C4dptc still presents diagnostic problems.

Over-reliance on C4dptc and MVI lesions is a key flaw in the diagnosis of chronic active-AMR (CA-AMR), when target PTC are lost due to humoral damage. In acute AMR, capillary endothelial cells suffer apoptosis and detachment, leading to the collapse and luminal blockage of interstitial microcirculation. In chronic rejection, this interstitial microcirculation gradually vanishes with the progression of interstitial fibrosis. Only 49.4% of TG samples were positive for C4dptc (weighted average, 12 investigations, n = 656 biopsies) [3]. The most frequent fluctuation in C4dptc occurs in early subclinical AMR (37.0%) and it is indifferent to parenchymal disease and graft failure predictions. Examining C4dglom, a bigger antigenic target for DSA deposition, is one doable solution. Through reactive sulfhydryl groups, cleaved C4b forms covalent bonds with nearby amino acid and carbohydrate moieties on glomerular endothelial cells and basement membrane collagen. As the local "footprint" of the classical complement system activation by DSA binding within the glomerular capillaries, stable C4d continues to be detected after proteolytic deactivation [4].

The 2001 Banff AMR diagnostic paradigm initially called for linear C4dptc, omitting glomeruli because to the variable positivity of C4d immunofluorescence in mesangium, sporadic capillary loops and collagen autofluorescence from sclerosed glomeruli in normal glomeruli. Although less sensitive, chromogenic C4d immunohistochemical labelling of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue eliminates this difficulty since background C4dglom is not present in healthy glomeruli. When immunofluorescence tissue is lacking, mesangial and glomerular capillary C4d immunoperoxidase of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue is employed for salvaging in complement-activating native glomerular disorders (such as membranous, lupus and immunecomplex glomerulonephritis [GN]). Although C4dglom staining in active AMR and chronic TG using immunoperoxidase was found in several transplant studies, its utility as a diagnostic biomarker is not generally approved. We proposed three hypotheses: I C4dglom represents endothelial interaction with antibody in transplanted kidneys; (ii) the degree of immunoperoxidase staining of C4dglom correlates with clinical, immunologic and pathologic humoral activities; and (iii) incorporation into the Banff chronic AMR schema would improve diagnostic sensitivity and improve etiologic classification of late chronic AMR expressed as TG.

The prevalence of C4dglom, epidemiologic risk factors and correlations with authenticated AMR markers, such as circulating DSA, histologic MVI, Banff cg scores and C4dptc, were all calculated in a well-characterized cohort of 3524 consecutive adequate samples from ABO-compatible kidney transplant recipients. There was no background C4dglom staining in any of the preimplantation donor tissues. By adding C4dglom and improving graft failure discrimination, the subpar diagnostic performance of the Banff 2019 CA-AMR definition (using just C4dptc) to diagnosis verified TG was significantly improved [5].

We sequenced the circulating plasma miR transcriptome using GRAfT, a multicenter prospective cohort study of heart transplant recipients, to find miRs that are differently regulated during acute allograft rejection. The main conclusions of this investigation include the development of different miR panels with superior test performance characteristics that may be utilised to screen for and noninvasively diagnose ACR and AMR from a peripheral blood sample.

Conclusion

According to the study's findings on clinical parameters, ABMR has a bad prognosis; thus, the course of therapy should be tailored to the patient's unique pathological findings and graft functions at the time of diagnosis. All ABMR patients should be treated with pulse methylprednisolone and IVIG, although there are some situations when PP, rituximab and ATG should be employed. The prognosis for ABMR is poor and therapy should be customised.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

The author shows no conflict of interest towards this manuscript.

References

  1. Gloor, J.M., S. Sethi, M.D. Stegall and W.D. Park, et al. "Transplant glomerulopathy: subclinical incidence and association with alloantibody.Am J Transplant 7 (2007): 2124-2132.
  2. Crossref, Indexed at, Google Scholar

  3. Haas, M and J. Mirocha. "Early ultrastructural changes in renal allografts: correlation with antibody‐mediated rejection and transplant glomerulopathy.Am J Transplant 11 (2011): 2123-2131.
  4. Crossref, Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Shimizu, Tomokazu, Hideki Ishida, Daisuke Toki and Taiji Nozaki, et al. "Clinical and pathological analyses of transplant glomerulopathy cases.Nephrology 19 (2014): 21-26.
  6. Crossref, Indexed at, Google Scholar

  7. Sis, Banff, M. Mengel, M. Haas and R.B. Colvin, et al. "Banff’09 meeting report: antibody mediated graft deterioration and implementation of Banff working groups.Am J Transplant 10 (2010): 464-471.
  8. Crossref, Indexed at, Google Scholar

  9. Loupy, A., G.S. Hill, C. Suberbielle and D. Charron, et al. "Significance of C4d Banff scores in early protocol biopsies of kidney transplant recipients with preformed donor specific antibodies (DSA).Am J Transplant 11 (2011): 56-65.
  10. Crossref, Indexed at, Google Scholar

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 223

Transplantation Technologies & Research received 223 citations as per Google Scholar report

Transplantation Technologies & Research peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward