GET THE APP

Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Viruses and Associated Risk Factors in Patients Suspected of Liver Diseases in Asmara, Eritrea
..

Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medicine

ISSN: 2576-1420

Open Access

Research Article - (2022) Volume 7, Issue 2

Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Viruses and Associated Risk Factors in Patients Suspected of Liver Diseases in Asmara, Eritrea

Yafet Kesete*, Nahom Fessehaye, Oliver Okoth Achila, Feven Mekonen, Lidya Woldemariam, Habte Mehari, Natnael Meles, Lidia Libsekal, Solomon Habtemichael and Yacob Brhane
*Correspondence: Yafet Kesete, Department of Allied Health Sciences, Orotta College of Medicine and Health Sciences, ORCiD No: 0000-0003-4569-3544, Asmara, Eritrea, Tel: +2917613042, Email:
Department of Allied Health Sciences, Orotta College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Asmara, Eritrea

Received: 30-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. jidm-22-52856; Editor assigned: 05-Feb-2022, Pre QC No. P-52856; Reviewed: 22-Feb-2022, QC No. Q-52856; , Manuscript No. R-52856; Published: 28-Feb-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2576-1420.22.7.218
Citation: Kesete, Yafet, Nahom Fessehaye, Oliver Okoth Achila and Feven Mekonen, et al. “Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Viruses and Associated Risk Factors in Patients Suspected of Liver Diseases in Asmara, Eritrea.” J Infect Dis Med 7 (2022): 224.
Copyright: © 2022 Kesete Y, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Sources of funding : Not applicable

Abstract

Background: Hepatitis is a critical global health problem and acquiring adequate and recent epidemiological data on HBV and HCV infections is important in prevention and control of the disease. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of hepatitis B and C infection, liver enzymes profile and associated risk factors among patients suspected of liver diseases in Asmara, Eritrea.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients suspected of liver diseases. 411 participants were screened for serological markers of HBsAg and anti-HCV using rapid assays. Socio-demographic and risk factors data were collected using a pre-designed structured questionnaire. Liver function tests were also performed using an automated spectrophotometer analyzer. Furthermore, for every HBV and HCV positive samples viral load was determined. Collected data were then entered and analyzed using SPSS v.20.

Result: The overall prevalence of HBV and HCV among study participants was 6.6% and 1.7% respectively. Hepatitis virus positive participants had significantly higher mean values of ALT, AST, ALP, total bilirubin and GGT. Viral load mean assay level was 10.6 × 106 IU/ml ranging from 20 IU/ml to 1.7 × 108 IU/ml. There was a significant association between HBsAg and sex (cOR= 4.18, 95% CI: 1.65-10.6), residence area (cOR=2.51, 95% CI: 1.10-5.69). Multivariate logistic analysis showed males were more prone to HBsAg infection (aOR= 3.9, 95% CI: 1.5-10.0). Moreover, prevalence of liver enzyme abnormality was 8.5% (95% CI: 6.1%- 8.2%). Among these patients, 24 (5.8%) had cholestatic type, 4(1%) had hepatocellular type, and another 7 (1.7%) had mixed type of liver injury.

Conclusion: Though the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection is comparatively low, regular surveillance should be carried out to prevent further transmission of disease and achieve the goals of global HBV and HCV elimination.

Keywords

Chronic liver disease • Hepatocellular • Viral load • Liver injury • Cholestatic

Abbreviations

ANC: Antenatal Care; ALT: Alanine Aminotransferase; ALP: Alkaline Phosphatase; AST: Aspartate Aminotransferase; CLD: Chronic Liver Disease; HBV: Hepatitis B Virus; HCV: Hepatitis C Virus; IU: International Unit; WHO: World Health Organization.

Introduction

Liver diseases are responsible for over one and half million deaths annually and are characterized by permanent inflammatory processes that predispose to liver cancer. The liver is, in many ways, the reflection of a person’s health and should play a central role in worldwide public health policies [1]. Worldwide, annually HBV and HCV related liver diseases kill 1-2 million people [2].

Chronic Liver Disease (CLD) results from an inflammatory injury to the liver, which has persisted for six or more months without complete resolution. CLD comprises a spectrum of disease such as chronic hepatitis, alcoholinduced liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, autoimmune liver disease, drug-induced liver disease, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma [3,4]. Current, but probably undervalued, worldwide estimations show that 844 million people have CLDs, with a mortality rate of 2 million deaths per year [1].

Viral hepatitis caused by HBV and HCV account for a substantial proportion of chronic liver diseases worldwide leading to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver failure, and eventually death. The estimated Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBs Ag) seroprevalence in different parts of the world ranges between 0.1%–20% [5]. The African and western-Pacific countries harbor 68% of all chronic hepatitis B infections globally [5]. Most of the African countries (99%) are in higher-intermediate and higher-endemic zone with HBsAg seroprevalence of 5–7% and >8%, respectively. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the HBV carrier rate is over 8% [6].

HBV and HCV may appear as coinfection due to the same mode of transmission such as exposure to infective blood, semen, other body fluids, or from infected mothers to infants at the time of birth. Transmission may also occur through transfusion of HBV/HCV contaminated blood and blood products, contaminated injections during medical procedures and among drug users. Sexual transmission is also possible. Several studies documented that HBV and HCV coinfection accelerates liver disease progression and increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma [7].

Due to the slow and silent onset of the disease, an estimated 95% of individuals with chronic HBV or HCV infection, or both, are unaware of their infection and so do not benefit from clinical care, treatment, and interventions that are designed to reduce onward transmission [8]. Even though Eritrea is located in a region considered to be highly endemic with viral hepatitis infections, there is only limited data on the assessment of HBV and HCV infections in the general population. Accurate estimates of the epidemiologic burden of HBV and HCV are critical for health care planning and for understanding unmet clinical needs.

By establishing a true burden, a clear path is created in achieving the goals of HBV and HCV elimination and addressing prevention of mother to child transmission, universal vaccination, and identification of individuals infected with HBV and HCV, with the appropriate linkage to care. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of hepatitis B and C infections among patients suspected of liver disease.

Materials and Methods

Study area and design

A cross sectional study was conducted among patients suspected of liver diseases visiting Orotta and Halibet National Referral Hospitals in Asmara, capital city of Eritrea. They are the largest tertiary hospitals with catchment area of over 814,000 inhabitants and with simultaneously large number referral patients visiting from around the country. These hospitals serve a large volume of patients and have the availability of facilities for processing and storing blood specimen.

Sampling technique

The study was carried out with a sampling method of convenience in the sense that, participants were patients who turned up voluntarily in the two hospitals being suspected of liver disease. Patients suspected of liver diseases aged 16 and above with test order of hepatitis B and C for the first time were included in study. Patients who know their HBV/HCV status and/or on antiviral therapy were excluded.

Data collection

A structured questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic characteristics (age, educational level, religion, area of residence) and history of risk exposure practices (blood transfusion, dental extraction, surgery). For participants aged 16-18 years, parental guidance was obtained when requesting information.

Sample collection and analysis

A total of 10 ml of venous blood sample was obtained, after applying standard antiseptic technique, in a uniquely labelled chemistry tubes from each individual. Blood specimens were then allowed to clot and serum was separated by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 3 minutes. The serum samples were stored at 60C and were analyzed within 24 hours of collection. Each participant sample was screened for HBsAg (MEDIFF: One for All, France) and anti-HCV (MEDIFF: One for All, France) by one-step insert rapid chromatography test strips. HBV and HCV viral load was performed on positive samples with the help of the COBAS AmpliPrep and COBAS TaqMan48 analyzer instruments. Liver function parameters including ALT, AST, ALP, total bilirubin, albumin and GGT were evaluated by automated spectrophotometric analyzer technique using AU480 Chemistry Analyzer (Beckman Coulter AU480). For assessment of liver injury type, the upper limit of normal(ULN) > 30 IU/L was set as a reference level, hepatocellular (ALT ≥ 3 × ULN; R ≥ 5), cholestatic (ALP ≥ 2 × ULN; R ≤ 2), mixed (ALT ≥ 3 × ULN, ALP ≥ 2 × ULN; R > 2 to <5) where R value = (ALT/ULN)/(ALP/ULN).

Statistical analysis

Data generated was subjected to statistical analysis using computer software (SPSS version 20.0, SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Responses in the questionnaires and laboratory results were tabulated, coded and processed. Cross tabulations were used to analyze relationship between dependent and independent variables. Descriptive statistics was used to give clear picture of background variables using frequency distribution tables and percentages. Depending of the nature of the variables, Pearson Chi square (χ2) test/ or Fishers exact test was conducted to evaluate the relationship between independent and dependent variables. Multivariate and univariate logistic regression was fitted to establish the relationship between specific liver function profiles and associated risk factors. At 95% level of significance, observed differences was considered to be significant at p<0.05.

Quality control

The validity and completeness of the questionnaire was ascertained by experts in infectious disease and medical microbiology. Data and sample collectors were senior year clinical laboratory science students which were supervised for a common understanding using role play interviews and thorough discussion sessions. For laboratory chemical tests, all the chemistry analytical equipment’s were periodically undergoing calibration and quality control according to laboratory protocols prior to sample processing. The performance of the rapid HBs Ag and anti-HCV test kits were evaluated using known positive and negative controls. At the same time, all the positive samples for both HBsAg and anti-HCV were confirmed using ELISA technique. As per viral load testing, one replicate each of the COBAS TaqMan Negative Control, the HCV Low Positive Control and the HCV High Positive Control were included in each test batch.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of study subjects

A total of 411 blood samples were collected from patients suspected of liver diseases and referred to the laboratory for HBV and HCV seromarker testing. Of these, 215(52.3%) were females and 196 (47.7%) were males. The mean ± standard deviation age of patients was 43.3 ± 17.3 years (ranging from 16– 88 years). 328 (79.8%) participants were from urban areas while 83 (20.2%) participants were from rural areas. Majority of subjects were government employees (40.6%). Based on level of education, most participants had at least primary education. Most of the participants belonged to the majority Tigrigna ethnic group (85.9%) and the rest (14.1%) belonging to the remaining 8 ethnic groups (Table 1).

Table 1: Sociodemographic and risk factor characteristics of study participants and seroprevalence of HBsAg and anti-HCV.

Characteristics   Overall N (%) HBsAg Anti-HCV
N (%) N (%)
Sex Male 196 (47.7) 21 (10.7) 3 (1.5)
Female 215 (52.3) 6 (2.8) 4 (1.5)
Age 16-24 65 (15.8) 4 (6.2) 0 (0)
25-34 80 (19.5) 6 (7.5) 1 (1.2)
35-44 77 (18.7) 4 (5.2) 0 (0)
>45 189 (46) 13 (6.9) 6 (3.2)
Religion Christian 340 (82.7) 20 (5.9) 5 (1.5)
Muslim 71 (17.3) 7 (9.9) 2 (2.8)
Ethnicity Tigrigna 353 (85.9) 21 (5.9) 5 (1.4)
Tigre 32 (7.8) 3 (9.4) 1 (3.1)
Others 26 (6.3) 3 (11.5) 1 (3.8)
Residence Urban 328 (79.8) 17 (5.2) 7 (2.1)
Rural 83 (20.2) 10 (12.0) 0 (0)
Occupation Housewife 91 (22.1) 3 (3.3) 4 (4.4)
Governmental 167 (40.6) 16 (9.6) 2 (1.2)
Private/ Self-employed 109 (26.5) 7 (6.4) 1 (0.9)
Unemployed 44 (10.7) 1 (2.3) 0 (0)
Educational Level Illiterate 55 (13.4) 3 (5.5) 2 (3.6)
Primary 127 (30.9) 10 (7.9) 1 (0.8)
Secondary 137 (33.3) 5 (3.6) 3 (2.2)
College & Higher 92 (22.4) 9 (9.8) 1 (1.1)
Marital Status Married 249 (60.6) 21 (8.4) 6 (2.4)
Single 100 (24.3) 5 (5.0) 0 (0)
Widow/divorced 62 (15.1) 1 (1.6) 1 (1.6)
Prior knowledge of hepatitis Yes 82 (20.0) 7 (8.5) 3 (3.7)
No 329 (80) 20 (6.1) 4 (1.2)
History of transfusion Yes 36 (8.8) 1 (2.8) 1 (2.8)
No 375 (91.2) 26 (6.9) 6 (1.6)
History of surgery Yes 80 (19.5) 1 (1.2) 2 (2.5)
No 331 (80.5) 26 (7.9) 5 (1.5)
History of dental extraction Yes 229 (24.3) 10 (4.4) 6 (2.6)
No 182 (15.1) 17 (9.3) 1 (0.5)
Sharing of sharp materials Yes 73 (17.8) 7 (9.6) 2 (2.7)
No 338 (82.2) 20 (5.9) 5 (1.5)
Traditional practice Yes 253 (61.6) 18 (7.1) 5 (2.0)
No 158 (38.4) 9 (5.7) 2 (1.3)
Unprotected sexual practice Yes 40 (9.7) 1 (2.5) 0 (0)
No 371 (90.3) 26 (7) 7 (1.9)

Seroprevalence of HBsAg and Anti-HCV markers

Out of the total samples, 27 were found to be positive for HBsAg giving an overall prevalence of 6.6% (95% CI: 4.4%-9%) and 7 samples were positive for anti-HCV antibody giving an overall prevalence of 1.7% (95% CI: 0.5%-3.2%). None of the subjects were co-infected with HBV and HCV.

Moreover, of the 27 HBsAg positive samples, viral load quantification was performed for all except for one which was found to have insufficient quantity. Similarly, 2 out of the 7 positive anti-HCV samples were not sufficient for viral load test. All participants found seropositive were not under any antiviral therapy. Mean assay level was 10.6 × 106 IU/ml with the range of 20IU/ml -1.7 × 108 IU/ml. One sample was present with undetectable viral DNA (<9 IU/ml). 14 seropositive samples had viral load below 2000 IU/ml, 7 in the range 2000- 20,000 IU/ml and 10 had viral load >20,000 IU/ml.

Socio-demographic and risk factor characteristics of study participants in relation to HBsAg and anti-HCV prevalence

The study tried to establish association of positivity between HBsAg seromarker, socio demographic and risk factor characteristics of study participants. Association studies were not done for anti-HCV seromarker as the number of positive cases was too low.

According to univariate logistic analysis results, a significant association was recorded between HBsAg and sex, residence. HBV infection was highly prevalent among male participants (cOR = 4.18, 95% CI:1.65-10.586) while females had increased rate of HCV infection (1.9%). The highest prevalence of HBsAg (7.5%) and HCV (3.2%) was seen among participants aged 25-34 and greater than 45, respectively.

Participants from rural areas had higher odds of having HBsAg (cOR=2.506, 95% CI:1.10-5.69) compared with those from urban areas (Table 2). However, the seroprevalence of anti-HCV was greater in urban areas (2.1%). Moreover, the highest seroprevalence of HBsAg was observed in participants with higher level of education (9.8%). In contrast, anti-HCV seroprevalence decreased with increasing level of education. Married participants were found to be more exposed to both HBsAg and anti HCV with seropositivity 8.4% and 2.4% respectively. Governmental employees exhibited higher prevalence of HBsAg seromarker (9.6%) whereas housewives showed greater seroprevalence of anti-HCV (4.4%).

Table 2: Association of socio-demographic characteristics in relation to HBsAg.

Variables   Laboratory results for Positive HBsAg test
Pos (%) cOR (95% CI) aOR (95%CI)
Sex Female 21 (10.7) 1 1
Male 6 (2.8) 4.18 (1.65-10.6)* 3.9 (1.5-10.0)*
Age 16-24 4 (6.2) 1.31 (0.41-4.16) 0.93 (0.28-3.13)
25-34 6 (7.5) 0.83 (0.217-3.23) 0.78 (0.19-3.18)
35-44 4 (5.2) 1.64 (0.42-6.42) 1.12 (0.27-4.66)
>45 13 (6.9) 1 1
Residence Urban 17 (5.2) 1 1
Rural 10 (12.0) 2.51 (1.10-5.69)* 1.55 (0.65-3.69)
Surgical History No 1 (1.2) 6.73 (0.9-50.4) 5.39 (0.69-41.8)
Yes 26 (7.9) 1 1
Dental Extraction No 10 (4.4) 2.25 (0.99-5.06) 1.97 (0.84-4.63)
Yes 17 (9.3) 1 1

Minority ethnic groups were present with higher prevalence of HBsAg (11.5%). Participants with transfusion and surgical history depicted lower prevalence for HBsAg. Moreover, higher positivity of HBsAg seromarker was observed in those who had no dental extraction history (9.3%) while the reverse was true for anti-HCV seromarker (2.6%). Elevated seroprevalence of HBV infections was recorded in those who performed traditional practices (7.1%) and in those who have one or more family member infected with HBV (10.7%). Further analysis using multivariate logistic analysis for significant variables demonstrated a substantial relation between HBsAg infection and sex (aOR= 4.97, 95% CI: 1.212-20.374).

Assessment of Liver enzyme function tests

Table 3 summarized the mean levels of liver enzymes between HCV and HBV positive and negative individuals and 95% CI for mean. Generally, hepatitis virus positive participants had significantly higher mean values of ALT, AST, ALP, total bilirubin and GGT when compared with the negative individuals.

Table 3: Descriptive comparison of Liver enzymes test outcomes among study participants.

Parameters HBsAg Anti-HCV
Positive Negative Positive Negative
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean + SD Mean ± SD
AST 52.04±44.6 30.6±38.1 37.86±23.2 31.9±38.9
ALT 40.22±34.2 21.3±26.9 28.9±14.7 22.6±27.8
ALP 160.1±67 91.3±76.3 97.8±27.4 95.9±89.3
Bilirubin 1.25±1.08 0.88±1.59 1.3±0.5 0.94±1.91
GGT 74.4±139.1 25.3±34.8 68.4±61.3 28.6±50.2

Table 4 depicts the prevalence and pattern of liver injury to the enrolled subjects. The investigation showed the prevalence of liver injury was 8.5% (95% CI: 6.1%- 8.2%). Among these patients 24 (5.8%) had cholestatic type, 4(1%) had hepatocellular type, and another 7 (1.7%) had mixed type of liver injury. Cholestatic type of liver injury was predominant in self-employed/ unemployed patients. Statistics also revealed a significant association between hepatitis infection, gender, residence and the pattern of liver injury (p<0.05).

Table 4: Patients characteristics and pattern of liver toxicity according to liver function tests.

Category Cholestatic Hepatocellular Mixed Normal Total P (X2)
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Gender Male 20 (10.2) 3 (1.5) 3 (1.5) 170 (86.7) 196 (47.7) 0.002*
Female 4 (1.9) 1 (0.5) 4 (1.9) 206 (95.8) 215 (52.3)
Age 16-24 6 (9.2) 1 (1.5) 0 (0) 58 (89.2) 65 (15.8) 0.603
25-34 3 (3.8) 0 (0) 1 (1.2) 76 (95) 80 (19.5)
35-44 4 (5.2) 2 (2.6) 2 (2.6) 69 (89.6) 77 (18.7)
>45 11 (5.8) 1 (0.5) 4 (2.1) 173 (91.5) 189 (46)
Education Illiterate 6 (10.9) 0 (0) 2 (3.6) 47 (85.5) 55 (13.4) 0.203
Primary 7 (5.5) 0 (0) 4 (3.1) 116 (91.3) 127 (30.9)
Secondary 9 (6.6) 3 (2.2) 1 (0.7) 124 (90.5) 137 (33.3)
College 2 (2.2) 1 (1.1) 0 (0) 89 (96.7) 92 (22.4)
Residence Urban 15 (4.6) 4 (1.2) 2 (0.6) 307 (93.6) 328 (79.8) 0.001*
Rural 9 (10.8) 0 (0) 5 (6.0) 69 (83.1) 83 (20.2)
Occupation Housewife 2 (2.2) 0 (0) 2 (2.2) 87 (95.6) 91 (22.1) 0.06
Governmental 6 (3.6) 3 (1.8) 4 (2.4) 154 (92.2) 91 (22.1)
Private/ Self-employed 10 (9.2) 0 (0) 1 (0.9) 98 (89.9) 109 (26.5)
Unemployed 6 (13.6) 1 (2.3) 0 (0) 37 (84.1) 44 (10.7)
Hepatitis virus Negative 20 (5.3) 4 (1.1) 4 (1.1) 349 (92.6) 377 (91.7) 0.003*
Positive 4 (11.8) 0 (0) 3 (8.8) 27 (79.4) 34 (8.3)
viral load Low 2 (14.3) 0 (0) 1 (7.1) 11 (78.6) 14 (45.2) 0.688
Moderate 1 (14.3) 0 (0) 1 (14.3) 5 (71.4) 7 (22.6)
High 1 (10) 0 (0) 1 (10) 8 (80) 10 (32.3)

Discussion

This is the first study determining the prevalence of hepatitis B and C viruses among patients suspected of liver disease in Eritrea. In this study, the overall prevalence of HBsAg and anti-HCV antibody markers was found to be 6.6% and 1.7% respectively. Generally, there is a lack of comprehensive data on the prevalence of HBV and HCV infections in Eritrea especially among liver diseases patients. Nevertheless, the reported prevalence is much higher compared to studies conducted among blood donors (2.6%) and antenatal care attendees (3.2%) in the same study setting [9,10]. However, this finding is consistent with other similar studies conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa [4,11,12] and Asia [13].

Similarly, the anti-HCV prevalence of the present study is higher than what is reported among blood donors (0.18%) in Eritrea [10] but consistent with other studies worldwide [14-17]. This comparison only helps to highlight the extent of HBV and HCV infection among liver diseases suspected patients. But the interpretations of these prevalence magnitudes need caution as the characteristics of participants in the current study are entirely different than characteristics of healthy blood donors and antenatal attendees. The presence of HBV DNA/HCV RNA in peripheral blood is a reliable marker of active HBV/ HCV replication [18]. Among the HBsAg positive, 10 participants (32.3%) had high level of viral load that indicate a higher level of infectiousness with actively replicating viruses. Low levels were recorded in 14 patients (45.2%) with viral load <2000 IU/ml which are considered to have an inactive infection with low viremia thus a decreased level infectiousness [19,20].

The high presence of HBsAg among age group 25-34 is comparable to the finding of a study conducted in southeast Ethiopia and Pakistan which reported an increased seroprevalence among the age group 16-30 years [7]. However, a contrary outcome was obtained in case of HCV infection in agreement with other studies [21]. This might be explained by the fact that the probability of progressing into carrier and chronic infection is very high among patients infected with HCV compared to HBV. Moreover, cumulative risk of HCV exposure increases with age.

Male participants showed a significantly higher frequency of HBV infection (10.7%) unlike females showing higher results in HCV infection (1.9%) comparable to studies elsewhere [6,7,22]. The low infection rate of HBsAg in females may be due to spontaneous clearance of acute infection which is attributed to the occurrence of certain genetic factors such as IL28B genetic variant in females [21]. Moreover, the high prevalence of HBsAg in males might be due to the likelihood of men to have multiple sex partners and might be involved in unprotected sex [13].

Increased prevalence of HBsAg (5.9%) and anti-HCV (3.8%) markers was reported among the minority ethnic groups compared to Tigrigna. Similar findings were reported for HBsAg in the current study area among a research in pregnant women [9]. This variation in exposure to HBV among the different ethnic group’s calls for further investigations taking into account behavioral and cultural practices that could lead to hepatitis infection. Frequent traditional practices like marking/scarring of the face and traditional circumcision processes done in those societies might become the source of increased hepatitis infections.

In concordance with other studies [13,23] HBsAg was highly prevalent among participants from rural areas (12%). Several reports including the 2010 population and health survey and the 2014 millennium development goal indicated that poverty levels are particularly higher in rural areas compared to urban areas [24,25]. The finding of increased HBsAg prevalence in rural settings can be related to poverty, poor hygiene, less health services and also lack of knowledge about the disease. In addition, unsafe traditional practices prevailing in the vast rural areas can be the key mode of transmission.

Married participants were found to be more exposed to both HBsAg and anti-HCV with seropositivity of 8.4% and 2.4% respectively. This is consistent to a study done among CLD patients in India and Ethiopia in which HBsAg and anti-HCV was higher among married participants [6,13].

There was lower prevalence of HBsAg (1.3%) and higher anti-HCV (2.5%) seromarker in participants with history of surgery and transfusion in this study. This finding is coherent to studies conducted in Uganda [26] and Nigeria [27] in which the obtained lower rates of infection might be explained by the currently implemented screening protocols for potential blood borne pathogen [28,29]. Similarly, an increased HCV infection of 2.6% and decreased HBsAg seroprevalence of 4.4% was observed among participants who had dental extraction in coherence with other studies [6]. The use of unsterile materials or interchangeable use from one patient to another may have contributed to the increased rate of HCV infection.

Consistent with several studies, participants who exercised traditional practices showed higher prevalence of HBsAg (7.1%) than those who do not (5.7%) [21,27,30]. Having one or more family member infected with viral hepatitis increases the likelihood of horizontal transmission. Accordingly, an increased prevalence of HBsAg (10.7%) was recorded in those participants who had a family member infected with HBV.

Liver enzymes play an important role in the assessment of liver function because of liver injury resulting in cytolysis or necrosis that causes release of enzymes into circulation. They are crucial in differentiating hepatocellular (functional) from obstructive (mechanical) liver disease. It can be observed that those seropositive participants had an elevation in mean values for almost all the tested parameters for liver function test.

In this study, cholestatic type of liver injury 61 (42.36%) was the frequent type. In some parts of world, hepatocellular carcinoma is common, and HBV and other carcinogenic agents such as alcohol and aflatoxin could impart this [31,32]. These wide varied patterns maybe due the characteristic of the patients enrolled in the study. However, further studies in a large population are needed to explore the pattern of liver injury and its contributing factors.

Conclusion

A total of 411 samples were processed and the overall prevalence of HBsAg and anti-HCV seromarker was found to be 6.6% and 1.7% respectively. Even though Eritrea is located in the sub-Saharan region which has the record of high prevalence of both seromarkers, it has relatively lower seroprevalence when compared to the neighboring countries. Hepatitis infection was significantly associated with sex and residence of participants. Multivariate logistic analysis showed males were more prone to HBsAg infection. Participants seropositive for HBV and HCV infection showed an overall increase in almost all the measured liver enzyme parameters indicating injury to the liver.

Prevalence of hepatitis infections acquired from this study provides clearer understanding of HBV and HCV epidemiology. In spite of the relatively low prevalence of HBV and HCV infections, further surveillance should be carried out in the general population for a more representative picture of the prevalence and associated risk factors of HBV and HCV. Emphasis on eradication of health risky traditional practices should also be highlighted. The increased cost of treatment for these disease can be evaded through effective prevention measures.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethical consent was obtained from Orotta College Medicine and Health Sciences research ethical committee and Ministry of Health. Moreover, a written and verbal consent was obtained from study participants upon the acquisition of the data. The questionnaire contained a code for patient identification which was also used to label the blood sample to match the questionnaires. A written consent was also obtained while collecting blood sample for chemical analysis. Participants were also informed about their right to leave the study any time with no resultant consequence and standard care and respect was accorded to the targeted respondents whether they have consented or declined to participate in the study.

Funding

Not applicable.

Authors Contributions

FM, LW, HM, NM, LL, SH, YB conceived of the study, participated in the design, and performed the laboratory experiments. NF, OOA and YK performed the statistical analysis, participated in the design, data presentation and reviewed/edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgement

We would like to extend our gratitude to the laboratory staffs of Orotta National Referral Hospital, Halibet National Referral Hospital, Sembel Hospital and National Blood Transfusion Services for their assistance in sample collection, processing and storage. Our sincere thanks also goes to Mrs. Freweini Tecle and her staff members at the immunoserology department of National Health Laboratory.

Data Availability

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare on this study.

References

  1. Marcellin, Patrick, Blaise K Kutala. "Liver diseases: A major, neglected global public health problem requiring urgent actions and large‐scale screening." Liver Int 38 (2018): 2-6.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Spearman, C Wendy, Mary Afihene, Reidwaan Ally and Betty Apica et al. "Hepatitis B in sub-Saharan Africa: strategies to achieve the 2030 elimination targets." Lancet Gastroenterl  Hepatol 2 (2017): 900-909.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Wang, Fu‐Sheng, Jian‐Gao Fan, Zheng Zhang and Bin Gao et al. "The global burden of liver disease: the major impact of China." J Hepatol 60(2014): 2099-2108.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Ochwoto, Missiani, James H Kimotho, Julius Oyugi and Fredrick Okoth et al. "Hepatitis B infection is highly prevalent among patients presenting with jaundice in Kenya." BMC Infect  Dis 16 (2016): 1-14.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. WHO, "General Hepatitis Report, 2017," 2017.
  10. Ayele, Abel Girma, and Solomon Gebre-Selassie. "Prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections among patients with chronic liver diseases in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia." int. sch. res. notices (2013).
  11.  

    Google Scholar, Crossref

  12. Khan, Jafar, Mehwish Shafiq, Sameera Mushtaq and Sultan Ayaz et al. "Seropositivity and coinfection of hepatitis B and C among patients seeking hospital care in Islamabad, Pakistan." Biomed Res Int 2014.
  13. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  14. Bayo, Pontius, Emmanuel Ochola, Caroline Oleo and Amos Deogratius Mwaka. "High prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women attending antenatal care: a cross-sectional study in two hospitals in northern Uganda." BMJ open 4(2014): e005889.
  15. Google Scholar, Crossref

  16. Fessehaye, Nahom, A Berhane, H Ahmed, and E Odari et al. "Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection and associated seromarkers among pregnant women in Eritrea."  J hum Virol 6(2018): 30-38.
  17. Google Scholar, Crossref

  18. Fessehaye, Nahom, Durgadas Naik, and Tesfay Fessehaye. "Transfusion transmitted infections–A retrospective analysis from the National Blood Transfusion Service in Eritrea." Pan Afr med  J 9(2011).
  19. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  20. Kilonzo, Semvua B, Daniel W Gunda, Bonaventura CT Mpondo and Hyasinta Jaka et al. "Hepatitis B virus infection in Tanzania: current status and challenges." J  Trop Med 2018.
  21. Google Scholar, Crossref

  22. Amsalu, Anteneh, Getachew Ferede, Setegn Eshetie and Demissie Assegu et al. "Prevalence, infectivity, and associated risk factors of hepatitis B virus among pregnant women in Yirgalem Hospital, Ethiopia: implication of screening to control mother-to-child transmission." J Pregnancy 2018.
  23. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  24. Kundu, Anirban, Sonia Mehta, and B. K. Agrawal. "Prevalence of Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis-C Virus among Chronic Liver Disease Patients in Northern Haryana Region of India." JK Science 17(2015): 200.
  25. Google Scholar, Crossref

  26. Shepard, Colin W, Lyn Finelli, and Miriam J. Alter. "Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection." Lancet Infect Dis 5(2005): 558-567.
  27. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  28. Richard, Jean-Luc, Christian Schaetti, Sabine Basler, and Mirjam Mäusezahl. "The epidemiology of hepatitis C in Switzerland: trends in notifications, 1988–2015." Swiss Med Wkly 148(1970).
  29. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  30. Kirk, Gregory D, Olufunmilayo A  Lesi, Maimuna Mendy, and Aliu O Akano et al. "The Gambia Liver Cancer Study: Infection with hepatitis B and C and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in West Africa." J. Hepatol 3 (2004): 211-219.
  31. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  32. World Health Organization. Prevention and control of viral hepatitis infection: framework for global action. No. WHO/HSE/PED/HIP/GHP 2012.1. World Health Organization, 2012.
  33. Whalley, Simon A., John M. Murray, Dave Brown, and George JM Webster et al. "Kinetics of acute hepatitis B virus infection in humans." Exp Med 193(2001): 847-854.
  34. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  35. W. Levinson, Review of Medical Microbiology and Immunoserology, 2014, pp. 748-760.
  36. Weinbaum, Cindy, Rob Lyerla, and Harold S. Margolis. "Prevention and control of Infection with hepatitis viruses in correctional setting." MMWR Recomm Rep 52(2003): 205-14.
  37. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  38. Umumararungu, Esperance, Fabien Ntaganda, John Kagira, and Naomi Maina. "Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection and its risk factors among patients attending Rwanda Military Hospital, Rwanda." Biomed Res Int 2017 (2017).
  39. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  40. Popovici, Odette, Geza B. Molnar, Florin Popovici,and  Denisa Janţă et al. "A seroprevalence study of hepatitis B and C virus infections in a hospitalized population in Romania, an opportunity for a better national prevention and control strategy." J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 25(2016): 25-32.
  41. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  42. Ofori-Asenso, Richard, and Akosua Adom Agyeman. "Hepatitis B in Ghana: a systematic review & meta-analysis of prevalence studies (1995-2015)." BMC Infect Dis 16(2016): 1-15.
  43. Google Scholar, Crossref

  44. National Statistics Office, "Population and Health Survey 2010. Eritrea," Asmara, 2013.
  45. United Nations Development Programme, "Eritrea Health MDGs Reports 2014. Eritrea.," 2014.
  46. O'Reilly, J. I., P. Ocama, C. K. Opio,and  A. Alfred et al. "Risk factors and seroprevalence of hepatitis C among patients hospitalized at Mulago Hospital, Uganda." J. Trop. Med 2011 (2011).
  47. Google Scholar, Crossref

  48. Maghraby, Mohamed Hosam El-Din HM, Abdel Rahman A. Elsaied, Mohamed A. Alsenbesy and Ekram M. Abdel Khalek et al. "Risk factors of hepatitis B virus infection in urban and rural areas of Qena Governorate, Upper Egypt."
  49. Google Scholar

  50. F. Hollinger and J. Dienstag, "Hepatitis Viruses," J Clin Microbiol(1995).
  51. Karoney, Mercy Jelagat and Abraham Mogisi Siika. "Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Africa: a review." Pan Afr med J 14(2013).
  52. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  53. Tao, Issoufou, Tegwindé R. Compaoré, Birama Diarra and Florencia Djigma et al. "Seroepidemiology of hepatitis B and C viruses in the general population of Burkina Faso." Hepat Res Treat (2014).
  54. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  55. Powles, Thomas, Douglas Macdonald, Mark Nelson, and Justin Stebbing. "Hepatocellular cancer in HIV-infected individuals: tomorrow’s problem?." Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther 6(2006): 1553-1558.
  56. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  57. McGinnis, Kathleen A., Shawn L. Fultz, Melissa Skanderson and Joseph Conigliaro et al. "Hepatocellular carcinoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: the roles of HIV, hepatitis C infection, and alcohol abuse." J Clin Oncol24(2006): 5005-5009.
  58. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 59

Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medicine received 59 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medicine peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward