GET THE APP

Procedure to Decrease Material Construction Waste
..

Advances in Recycling & Waste Management

ISSN: 2475-7675

Open Access

Brief Report - (2022) Volume 7, Issue 2

Procedure to Decrease Material Construction Waste

Sabine Houot
Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK, United Kingdom

Received: 09-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. arwm-22-55304; Editor assigned: 09-Feb-2022, Pre QC No. P-55304; Reviewed: 11-Feb-2022, QC No. Q-55304; Revised: 14-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. R-55304; Published: 18-Feb-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/arwm.2022.7.213
Citation: Houot, Sabine. “Procedure to Decrease Material Construction Waste.” Adv Recycling Waste Manag 7 (2022): 213. DOI: 10.37421/arwm.2022.7.213
Copyright: © 2022 Houot S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Brief Report

In most parts of the world, the construction industry consumes a huge amount of natural resources and generates large quantities of construction waste. Construction waste, or Construction and Demolition (C&D) waste, is generally defined as a mixture of inert and non-inert materials arising from construction, excavation, renovation, demolition, roadwork and other construction-related activities. The inert materials comprise soft inert materials such as soil, earth and slurry, and hard inert materials such as rocks and broken concrete. The non-inert materials include wastes such as metals, timber, plastics and packaging wastes. The effective management of construction waste has become one of the key environmental issues in Hong Kong and many other places as there is limited space available for the disposal of the waste. In Hong Kong, in 2006, about 40% of the available landfill capacity was used to manage construction waste. Following the current trend, the landfills in Hong Kong will be filled up in 5-9 years.

Reducing the generation and recycling of construction waste are therefore a priority in the waste management hierarchy recycling of construction waste, in particular the inert and hard demolition rubbles, has received much research interests in the past decade. In fact, a number of research papers have been published in Waste Management disseminating useful information on the effects of recycled aggregates derived from construction waste on the properties of concrete and other construction products. However, relatively less emphasis has been paid on construction waste minimization (i.e., reducing waste at source). But with the introduction of higher charges for construction waste disposal and recycling, there are stronger economic incentives for developers and contractors to implement measures to reduce construction waste. Construction waste reduction can be achieved through changes in design concepts and through material and construction method selections. Design measures and concepts that can be used to reduce construction waste include dimensional coordination and standardisation, minimizing the use of temporary works, avoiding late design modifications, and providing more detailed designs. Recent studies have shown that about 10% of construction waste is generated from the cutting of building materials during the construction process. If designers could consider at the design stage, dimensions to match with the material size standards, cutting wastes can be significantly reduced. The use of standard grids in the design could also facilitate the use of standard material sizes. Another design concept is the use of alternative forms of design to minimize the need for temporary works [1-5].

This could be achieved by specifying the use of low-waste building technologies such as prefabrication and system metal formworks. The use of these technologies can contribute to waste reduction significantly, as a recent study in Hong Kong showed that timber formworks account for about 30% of the waste identified on-site. These alternatives could also contribute to cost savings. Late design modifications due to last minute changes by clients are important as they generally involve demolishing the already built components and redoing of works. Therefore design modifications, if necessary, should be considered early in the design process, and late changes should be avoided. Also, by providing more detailed designs, waste reduction during construction could be achieved by avoiding abortive works and excessive redoing of works.

References

  1. Thanarajah, Sharmili Edwin, Heiko Backes, Alexandra G. DiFeliceantonio, and Kerstin Albus, et al. "Food intake recruits orosensory and post-ingestive dopaminergic circuits to affect eating desire in humans."Cell Metab 29 (2019): 695-706.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Boyle, Christina Neuner, Thomas Alexander Lutz, and Christelle Le Foll. "Amylin–Its role in the homeostatic and hedonic control of eating and recent developments of amylin analogs to treat obesity."Mol  Metab 8 (2018): 203-210.
  4. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  5. Hawton, Katherine, Danielle Ferriday, Peter Rogers, and Paula Toner, et al. "Slow down: behavioural and physiological effects of reducing eating rate."Nutrients11 (2018): 50.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Ahmed, Rebekah M., Yazi D. Ke, Steve Vucic, and Lars M. Ittner, et al. "Physiological changes in neurodegeneration—mechanistic insights and clinical utility."Nat Rev Neurol14 (2018): 259-271.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Allison, Kelly C., and Namni Goel. "Timing of eating in adults across the weight spectrum: Metabolic factors and potential circadian mechanisms."PhysioBehav 192 (2018): 158-166.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward