GET THE APP

Productivity: An Overview
..

Entrepreneurship & Organization Management

ISSN: 2169-026X

Open Access

Commentary - (2022) Volume 11, Issue 3

Productivity: An Overview

Eve Shelly*
*Correspondence: Eve Shelly, Department of Finance and Accounting, University of Sfax, Tunisia, Email:
Department of Finance and Accounting, University of Sfax, Tunisia

Received: 10-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. jeom-22-56083; Editor assigned: 18-Feb-2022, Pre QC No. P-56083; , QC No. Q-56083; Revised: 24-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. R-56083; Published: 07-Mar-2022
Citation: Shelly, Eve. “Productivity: An Overview.” J Entrepren Organiz Manag 11 (2022): 350. DOI: 10.37421/jeom.2022.11.350
Copyright: © 2022 Shelly E. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Commentary

Productivity is a metric that expresses the efficiency with which commodities or services are produced. Productivity is frequently represented as a ratio of aggregate output to a single input or an aggregate input used in a manufacturing process, i.e. output per unit of input, usually over a given time period. The (aggregate) labour productivity statistic, such as GDP per worker, is the most common example [1]. There are many various definitions of productivity (including those that aren't defined as output-to-input ratios), and which one to use is determined by the goal of the productivity measurement and/or the availability of data. The main source of variation across productivity measures is usually tied (directly or indirectly) to how the outputs and inputs are aggregated into scalars to create such a ratio-type measure of productivity. Mass production and batch production are two different types of production. Productivity is a critical aspect in a company's or a country's ability to produce goods [2]. More real money improves people's ability to acquire goods and services, enjoy leisure, improve housing and education, and contribute to social and environmental initiatives, therefore increasing national production can raise living standards.

Increased productivity can also help organisations become more profitable. Partial productivities are productivity measurements that use one class of inputs or factors but not multiple factors. In practise, production measurement refers to partial productivity measures [3]. These components, when correctly interpreted, are indicative of productivity growth and approximate the efficiency with which inputs are utilised to produce commodities and services in an economy. Productivity, on the other hand, is only measured in part – or in a rough sense. Although the measurements are flawed in that they do not measure everything, it is possible to accurately interpret partial productivity figures and use them in practical scenarios. Partially productive measurements at the firm level include worker hours, materials, and energy used per unit of production. Partial productivity was recorded in tabular form and with handdrawn graphs before the widespread usage of computer networks. Tabulating machines for data processing became popular in the 1920s and 1930s and remained popular until the late 1960s and early 1970s, when mainframe computers became popular. By the late 1970s, low-cost computers had made it possible for industrial operations to regulate processes and track productivity [4].

Data collecting is now entirely computerised, and practically any variable may be graphically examined in real time or retrieved for certain time periods. Labor productivity is a typical partial productivity indicator in macroeconomics. Because it provides a dynamic measure of economic development, competitiveness, and living standards within an economy, labour productivity is a telling indication of various economic variables. It is the measure of labour productivity (and everything that this measure encompasses) that aids in explaining the fundamental economic underpinnings required for both economic growth and social progress. In general, labour productivity is defined as the ratio of an output volume measure (gross domestic product or gross value added) to an input use measure (the total number of hours worked or total employment). The output measure is usually net output, or the value added by the process in question, which is defined as the value of outputs minus the value of intermediate inputs. This is done to avoid double-counting, which occurs when one firm's output is utilised as an input by another in the same measurement [5]. The Gross Domestic Product, or GDP, is the most wellknown and often used measure of value-added in macroeconomics. Increases in it are often employed as a gauge of a country's or industry's economic growth. Gross domestic product (GDP) is the amount of money available to cover capital costs, labour compensation, taxes, and profits. Some economists prefer to utilise gross value added (GVA), which has a strong relationship with GDP.

The workforce's time, effort, and skills are reflected in the metric of input use. The most essential component that determines the measure of labour productivity is the denominator of the ratio of labour productivity, also known as the input measure. The total number of hours worked by all employees or total employment are used to calculate labour input (head count). The many input measurements employed in the computation of labour productivity have both advantages and downsides. Because a simple headcount of employed persons can hide changes in average hours worked and has difficulty accounting for variations in work such as a part-time contract, leave of absence, overtime, or shifts in normal hours, it is widely accepted that the total number of hours worked is the most appropriate measure of labour input. However, the accuracy of projections based on hours spent is not always evident. Because of the varied quality of hours-worked estimates and the varying degree of international comparability, statistical establishment and household surveys are particularly challenging to utilise. One of the key indices of economic performance is GDP per capita, which is an approximate indication of average living standards or economic well-being.

14 GDP is simply a rough estimate for this purpose. In theory, maximising GDP also allows for the most efficient use of capital. As a result, GDP is systematically skewed in favour of capital-intensive manufacturing over knowledge- and labor-intensive production. In the GDP-measure, capital is seen as valuable as the ability of the production to pay taxes, profits, and labour compensation. The discrepancy between the GDP and the producer income is what causes the GDP to be skewed. Another labour productivity measure, output per worker, is sometimes viewed as a proper measure of labour productivity, as in this statement: "Productivity isn't everything, but it is almost everything in the long term." The ability of a country to enhance its standard of life over time is nearly entirely determined by its ability to increase output per worker." However, this metric (output per worker) is more problematic or even invalid than GDP because it allows for the maximisation of all given inputs, including as materials, services, energy, and capital, at the expense of producer income.

References

  1. Reza, Md Nasim, Md Shariful Islam, and Md Sajib Howlader. "Improving Productivity of Garment Industry with Line Balancing."https://textilelearner.net/productivity-by-line-balancing/
  2. Sickles, Robin C, Valentin Zelenyuk. Measurement of productivity and efficiency. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
  3. Google Scholar, Crossref

  4. Sumanth, David J. Total productivity management (TPmgt): a systemic and quantitative approach to compete in quality, price and time. CRC Press, 1997.
  5. Google Scholar

  6. Baumann, H. P., J. L. Bennett, William M. Black and Blackie William, et al. "Examination of union agreements for contingent liabilities." Development (1947) 154.
  7. Google Scholar

  8. Ayres, Robert, and Benjamin Warr. Economic Growth, Technological Progress and Energy Use in the US Over the Lat Century: Identifying Common Trends and Structural Change in Macroeconomics Time Series. INSEAD, 2006.
  9. Google Scholar

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1115

Entrepreneurship & Organization Management received 1115 citations as per Google Scholar report

Entrepreneurship & Organization Management peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward