GET THE APP

Reducing Carbon Emissions in the Visitor Economy with Blockchain Technology
..

Journal of Global Economics

ISSN: 2375-4389

Open Access

Commentary - (2024) Volume 12, Issue 2

Reducing Carbon Emissions in the Visitor Economy with Blockchain Technology

Hyelin Heshmati*
*Correspondence: Hyelin Heshmati, Department of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan, Email:
Department of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan

Received: 06-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. economics-24-135681; Editor assigned: 08-Feb-2024, Pre QC No. P-135681; Reviewed: 22-Feb-2024, QC No. Q-135681; Revised: 27-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. R-135681; Published: 05-Mar-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2375-4389.2024.12.459
Citation: Heshmati, Hyelin. “Reducing Carbon Emissions in the Visitor Economy with Blockchain Technology.” J Glob Econ 12 (2024): 459.
Copyright: © 2024 Heshmati H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

The global tourism industry, often referred to as the visitor economy, is a significant contributor to carbon emissions due to transportation, accommodations, and associated activities. As societies increasingly prioritize sustainability, innovative solutions are imperative to mitigate the environmental impact of tourism. Blockchain technology, renowned for its transparency, security, and decentralized nature, presents a promising avenue for addressing carbon emissions in the visitor economy. This essay explores the potential of blockchain technology in reducing carbon emissions within the tourism sector. The visitor economy encompasses various activities, including transportation, accommodation, food services, entertainment, and shopping, all of which contribute to carbon emissions. Tourists travel by air, land, and sea, often using fossil fuel-dependent vehicles and accommodations with significant energy consumption. According to the World Travel & Tourism Council, tourism accounts for approximately 8% of global carbon emissions [1].

Description

Traditional approaches to carbon emission reduction in tourism face challenges such as lack of transparency, accountability, and coordination among stakeholders. Additionally, the complexity of global supply chains and disparate regulatory frameworks hinder effective mitigation efforts. These challenges underscore the need for innovative solutions that can facilitate transparency, incentivize sustainability, and streamline carbon offsetting mechanisms. Blockchain enables transparent and immutable recording of carbon emissions throughout the tourism value chain. Smart contracts can automate data collection and verification, providing stakeholders with real-time insights into their carbon footprint. By decentralizing data storage and processing, blockchain reduces reliance on centralized authorities, promoting peer-to-peer transactions and trustless interactions among stakeholders. This decentralized approach fosters collaboration and information sharing for more effective emission reduction strategies [2].

Blockchain facilitates the tokenization of carbon credits, allowing for the creation of tradable assets that represent verified emission reductions. Smart contracts can automate the issuance, trading, and retirement of carbon tokens, incentivizing sustainable practices and rewarding carbon-neutral behavior. Blockchain's immutable ledger ensures data integrity and accountability, enabling regulators to monitor compliance with carbon emission standards and regulations more effectively. This increased transparency discourages greenwashing and promotes genuine efforts towards emission reduction [3].

Platforms like Veridium and Poseidon use blockchain to tokenize carbon credits and facilitate transparent transactions between carbon emitters and offset buyers. These platforms enable travelers to offset their carbon footprint by purchasing digital tokens representing verified carbon credits. Companies like IBM and WWF are employing blockchain to trace the carbon footprint of products and services in the tourism supply chain. By recording carbon emissions at each stage of production and distribution, stakeholders can identify areas for optimization and implement targeted emission reduction strategies. Organizations like the Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) are exploring blockchain-based certification schemes to verify and authenticate sustainable tourism practices. By digitizing certification processes on a tamper-proof blockchain, stakeholders can enhance trust and transparency in sustainable tourism initiatives [4,5].

Conclusion

Despite its potential, blockchain technology also faces challenges and limitations in mitigating carbon emissions in the visitor economy. These include scalability issues, regulatory uncertainties, and the need for industry-wide collaboration. Overcoming these challenges will require continued innovation, investment, and stakeholder engagement. Blockchain technology holds immense promise for reducing carbon emissions in the visitor economy by enhancing transparency, accountability, and incentive mechanisms. Through decentralized ledgers, smart contracts, and tokenization, blockchain can revolutionize how carbon emissions are monitored, managed, and mitigated across the tourism value chain. As the world strives towards a more sustainable future, leveraging blockchain technology in the tourism sector will be instrumental in achieving carbon neutrality and preserving our planet for future generations.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

  1. Wang, Guofa, Yongxiang Xu and Huaiwei Ren. "Intelligent and ecological coal mining as well as clean utilization technology in China: Review and prospects." Int J Min Sci Technol 29 (2019): 161-169.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Zhang, Rui, Xiaotong Qie, Yanyong Hu and Xue Chen. "Does de-capacity policy promote the efficient and green development of the coal industry?–Based on the evidence of China." Resour Policy 77 (2022): 102717.

    Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Stilwell, L. C., R. C. A. Minnitt, T. D. Monso and G. Kuhn. "An input–output analysis of the impact of mining on the South African economy." Resour Policy 26 (2000): 17-30.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Lei, Yalin, Na Cui and Dongyang Pan. "Economic and social effects analysis of mineral development in China and policy implications." Resour Policy 38 (2013): 448-457.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Xu, Tang, Zhang Baosheng, Feng Lianyong and Marwan Masri, et al. "Economic impacts and challenges of China’s petroleum industry: An input–output analysis." Energy 36 (2011): 2905-2911.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1931

Journal of Global Economics received 1931 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Global Economics peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward