GET THE APP

Risk Management Mediates the Relationship between Outsourcing and Profitability of Manufacturing Firms
..

Business and Economics Journal

ISSN: 2151-6219

Open Access

Review Article - (2022) Volume 13, Issue 6

Risk Management Mediates the Relationship between Outsourcing and Profitability of Manufacturing Firms

Noah Mwelu1*, Susan Watundu2 and Musa Moya3
*Correspondence: Noah Mwelu, Department of Procurement and Logistics Management, Makerere University Business School, Plot 21A Port, Uganda, Tel: + 0775242204, Email:
1Department of Procurement and Logistics Management, Makerere University Business School, Plot 21A Port, Uganda
2Department of Management Science, Makerere University Business School, Plot 21A Port Bell Road, Kampala, Uganda
3Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Makerere University Business School, Plot 21A Port Bell Road, Kampala, Uganda

Received: 11-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. bej-22-69061; Editor assigned: 13-Jul-2022, Pre QC No. P-69061; Reviewed: 20-Jul-2022, QC No. Q-69061; Revised: 25-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. R-69061; Published: 30-Jul-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2151-6219.2022.13.385
Citation: Mwelu, Noah, Susan Watundu and Musa Moya. “Risk Management Mediates the Relationship between Outsourcing and Profitability of Manufacturing Firms.” Bus Econ J 13 (2022): 385.
Copyright: © 2022 Mwelu N, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Over decades, manufacturing firms are struggling to remain competitive in an intense manufacturing industry. The struggle is due to increasing manufacturing companies dealing in similar or related products. Given the competitive dynamics in the manufacturing industry, firms are proactively searching for viable strategies to ensure profitability and survival. Scholars and management have jointly conducted studies to find amicable strategies influencing firms’ profitability. Whereas various studies have been conducted on profitability, majority of these studies were concerned with strategies directly influencing profitability with little attention on the mediating role of other strategies. Specifically, little is known on mediation studies in manufacturing industry. Despite strategies directly influencing profitability being established, firms’ are in receivership with several kicked out of business indefinitely. This study bridges the gap by considering the mediating role of risk management on outsourcing and profitability of manufacturing firms. A cross-sectional research design was adopted. Specifically, a partial mediation approach was adopted following Baron and Kenny mediation guidelines. Results from Med-Graph and Sobel tests proved that risk management significantly mediated the relationship between outsourcing and profitability (Sobel Z-value=3.441, p=0.002). Hence, firms are encouraged to embrace mediation strategies in ensuring profitability and survival in the competitive environment.

Keywords

Outsourcing • Risk management • Profitability • Mediation • Manufacturing firms

Introduction

Survival for the fittest is a way to go for manufacturing firms operating in an intense competitive industry. This slogan has forced management of manufacturing firms to be more innovative to adopt strategies that are superior to encounter their business rivals and survive economic meltdown. Researchers have established that outsourcing and risk management directly influence profitability of many companies [1-7]. Profitability is key measurement indicator for firms’ financial performance that many scholars are arguing manufacturing firms to pay attention to [8-12]. Despite numerous efforts to safe guard firms’ financial performance, little attention has been paid to the mediating role of risk management on firm’s profitability that this study addressed herein. Mediation studies are increasing important in various research fields and are crucial in understanding the interplay of factors to enhance goal achievement [13-16].

Literature and hypothesis

With realities of competition amongst manufacturing firms, financial performance is important to translate firms into successful performers [17-21]. Accordingly, scholars and management continuously look for viable strategies to sustain their profits. Outsourcing is mentioned as one way to safe company costs that are translate into improved profits capable of financing firms’ operations [22-23]. Despite such recommendations, reports based on finding from selected manufacturing firms showed that outsourcing insignificantly influence profitability [24]. Such contradictions leave management with mixed feeling about its application. However, other scholars propose risk management as key strategy to influence profitability of manufacturing firms [25]. With these direct strategies determining firms’ profitability performance, lays a ground to slot in interactive effect among these strategies to see if profitability can be achieved through mediation since mediation studies pays vital role.

Reports show that firm’s motivation to outsource plays a crucial role in financial performance of manufacturing firms. It adds that intense competition and declining profits facing manufacturing firms have forced these firms to explore multiple strategies to overcome pressures. Outsourcing is found to be viable strategy enhancing firms’ capabilities to overcome competitive pressure. This strategy has seen firms devoting their resources to more value adding activities supporting their survival. However, as firms rush for such innovative strategies, management need to define which activities are core in order to commit their resources for profitable reaping. Despite increasing adoption of outsourcing strategy to boost profitability, manufacturing firms are persistently experiencing financial challenges. This is where management need to carefully decide which activities should be outsourced while weighing economic returns as compared to when previously managed in-house. This comparison is about cost reduction that qualifies why companies should outsource based on transaction costs. Besides cost reduction motive of outsourcing, manufacturing firms are able to acquire skilful manpower and avail their products to near markets altogether contributing significantly to improved profitability.

Whereas outsourcing is commonly evidenced in manufacturing firms, reports show that risk management strategies are inevitable in influencing firms’ profitability performance. Relatedly, risk planning helps firms to devise means of reducing adverse effects on firms’ operations through forecasting. Particular reports show that successful financial institutions attribute their success to risk management strategies involving planning, forecasting and ranking risks. This notion is supported since risk management enables firms to measure and quantify risks detrimental to their financial performance. This approach is equally useful for manufacturing firms since managing risks would enable them breakeven and hence profitability. The discussion above demonstrates use of multiple strategies to directly enhance profitability of firms without considering mediation effects among established strategies. This leads to propose hypothesis. H. Risk management mediates the relationship between outsourcing and profitability of manufacturing firms.

Methodology

A deductive approach involving quantitative techniques was used in this study. This approach was selected because its quantitative techniques are good in providing accurate estimates, reliable results and objective recommendations. A self- administered questionnaire was physically distributed to 164 respondents in 82 manufacturing firms in Uganda. These firms were selected from a population of 100 firms based on Krejcie and Morgan (1970) sampling tables. Two respondents were purposively selected from each organization based on management and supervisory roles. The decision for purposive sampling was due to the level of knowledge on company performance from the two positions. Repeated visits and reminders through phone calls were made resulting to 161 valid responses representing a 98.2% response rate. Measurement indicators were adopted and modified from previous studies. The questionnaire was tested for reliability and validity using Cranach Alpha and Content validity index respectively and the results are reported. Data screening was performed to check on completeness, accuracy, normality, outliers, reliability and validity. Mediation test was performed in five systematic steps including the first three steps of correlation, fourth step of hierarchical regression and the fifth step covering Sobel test. All these steps were necessary as a requirement for partial mediation. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software and Med-Graph excel programme. SPSS was used for correlations and regressions while Med-Graph based on Sobel tests was used to determine mediation effect following. The Sobel test results are presented with corresponding mediation.

Results and Discussion

The first three steps of mediation test covering correlations show that outsourcing, risk management and profitability variables are significantly related to each other as depicted by beta coefficients (Outsourcing and risk management: β=0.660, p=0.000; Risk management and Profitability: β=0.598, p=0.000 and Outsourcing and Profitability: β=0.521, p=0.000). Additionally, hierarchical regression results showed that both outsourcing and risk management are significantly related to profitability (β=0.451, p=0.000). Finally, Sobel test proved that risk management significantly mediated the relationship between outsourcing and profitability of manufacturing firms as depicted from Sobel Z-value (Sobel Z-value=3.44119, p=0.000579). This implies that there is a partial mediation since outsourcing predicted profitability directly (β=0.223) and indirectly through risk management (β=0.297) totalling to 0.521 beta coefficient. Hence, hypothesis is significantly supported. The results enable management understanding of how these strategies interact to enhance profitability of manufacturing firms. Furthermore, the mediating role of risk management would play a significant role in supporting policy formulation in manufacturing sector. Management should emphasize on deploying these two strategies together in order to promote profitability and successfully survive competitive pressure facing manufacturing industry.

Conclusion, Recommendations and Limitations

Cost transaction theory advocates for cost reductions amongst firms to manage their operations in order to survive the competition wave. Accordingly, management should explore an array of strategies to cope up with such competitive pressures. This has seen rising numbers of firms adopting a hybrid management style comprising of more than one strategy to excel in dynamic environment. The Sobel results of this study demonstrates this hybrid mechanism that management of manufacturing firms could employ through interactive effects of risk management and outsourcing to successfully achieve profit maximization. Hence, manufacturing firms are advised to adopt simultaneous application of risk management strategies and outsourcing practices to stimulate financial performance in order to remain competitive in the dynamic environment.

This study was limited a cross-sectional research design focussing on the role of risk management on outsourcing and profitability of manufacturing firms. Accordingly, future researchers are encouraged to adopt a longitudinal study and considering more factors to in ensuring profitability in manufacturing firms and beyond.

Data availability statement

This manuscript is prepared based on the statistical results determined using SPSS and Med-Graph excel programme based on Barron and Kenny mediation approach as reflected in the methodology and results sections above. The dataset for the analysis is available and can be submitted on request.

References

  1. Dhar, Kuldeep and Utkal Khandelwal. “Impact of goods and servicestax on supply chain management.” Bus Persp Res (2021).
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref   Indexed at

  3. Hansen, Michael Wendelboe. “Toward a strategic management perspective on local content in African extractives: MNC procurement strategies between local responsiveness and global integration.” Africa J Manag 6 (2020): 24-42.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref   Indexed at

  5. Yang, Qian, Qiang Wang and Xiande Zhao. “A taxonomy of transaction-specific investments and its effects on cooperation in logistics outsourcing relationships.” Inter J Log Res App 22 (2019):557-575.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Gadhoke, Tony. “Multi-sector approach ensures Mukwano Group thrives despite tough climate.” Africa J Manag 1 (2015):440-445.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Cagliano, Anna Corinna, Sabrina Grimaldi and Carlo Rafele. “Choosing project risk management techniques. A theoretical framework.” J Risk Res18 (2015): 232-248.
  10.                 Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Mwelu, Noah, Musa Moya, Moses Muhwezi, Donatus Mugisha Rulangaranga and Susan Watundu. “Outsourcing practices and profitability levels of manufacturing firms in Uganda.” (2014a).
  12. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  13. Holcomb, Tim R and Michael A. Hitt. “Toward a model of strategic outsourcing.” J Oper Manag 25 (2007): 464-481.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  15. Panda, Ajaya Kumar, Swagatika Nanda and Pradiptarathi Panda. “Working capital management, macroeconomic impacts, and firm profitability: Evidence from Indian SMEs.” Bus Persp Res 9 (2021):144-158.
  16. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  17. Amakom, Uzochukwu and Francis Ibeawuchi Amagwu. “Informal sources of microfinance and profitability of micro and small enterprises clusters in South-East Nigeria.” Bus Persp Res 8 (2020):173-185.
  18. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  19. Adeleye, Ifedapo, Yaw A. Debrah and Lilac Nachum. “Management of financial institutions in Africa: Emerging themes and future research agenda.” Africa J Manag 5 (2019): 215-230.
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  21. David-West, Olayinka, Nkemdilim Iheanachor and Immanuel Ovemeso Umukoro. “Mobile money as a frugal innovation for the bottom of the pyramid–Cases of selected African countries.” Africa J Manag 5 (2019): 274-302.
  22. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  23. Stede, Wim A. Van Der, Chee W. Chow and Thomas W. Lin. “Strategy, choice of performance measures, and performance.” Behav Res Acc 18  (2006):185-205.
  24. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  25. Qiu, Hongfeng, Suwei Weng and Michael Shengtao Wu. “The mediation of news framing between public trust and nuclear risk reactions in post-Fukushima China: A case study.” J Risk Res 24 (2021): 167-182.
  26. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  27. Chavadi, Chandan A., Monika Sirothiya and M.R. Vishwanatha. “Mediating role of job satisfaction on turnover intentions and job mismatch among millennial employees in Bengaluru.” Bus Persp Res (2021).
  28. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  29. Muppidathi, Ponmythili and Venkat R. Krishnan. “Transformational leadership and follower’s perceived group cohesiveness: Mediating role of follower’s Karma-yoga.” Bus Persp Res 9 (2021): 269-285.
  30. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  31. Bazzoli, Andrea and Matteo Curcuruto. “Safety leadership and safety voices: Exploring the mediation role of proactive motivations.” J Risk Res (2020): 1-20.
  32. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  33. Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele and Tazeeb Rajwani. “Managerial ties and access to finance in weak institutional contexts: Does CEO duality matter?.” Africa J Manag (2021):1-28.
  34. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  35. Ode-Ichakpa, Inalegwu, Emmanuel Cleeve, Chibuzo Amadi and Godswill Osemeke. “A business case argument for corporate social responsibility disclosure in Nigeria.” Africa J Manag 6 (2020):407-418.
  36. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  37. Pandya, Falguni H. “Study about awareness and availing of various direct and indirect fiscal incentives and its impact on financial and strategic decisions of MSMEs.” Bus Persp Res 5 (2017): 36-68.
  38. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  39. Patil, Rahul Jagannath. “Due date management to improve customer satisfaction and profitability.” Inter J Logist Res App 13 (2010): 273-289.
  40. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  41. Warburton, Roger D.H and Roy Stratton. “The optimal quantity of quick response manufacturing for an onshore and offshore sourcing model.” Inter J Logist Res App 8 (2005): 125-141.
  42. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  43. Cho, Jay Joong‐Kun, John Ozment and Harry Sink. “Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e-commerce market.” Inter J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38 (2008): 336-359.
  44. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  45. Agigi, Assilah, Kelvinne Mocke, Iman Carrim and Logan Keen. “Managing the dependency of focal firms on innovative suppliers: A qualitative study of automotive manufacturers in South Africa.” Africa J Manag (2021):1-27.
  46. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  47. Mwelu, Noah, Donatus M. Rulangaranga, Suzan Watundu, Will Kaberuka and Cathy K. Tindiwensi. “Risk management and profitability of manufacturing firms in Uganda.” Ind Eng Lett 4 (2014).
  48. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  49. Ramly, Nurul Syahirah Binti. “Firm risk and performance of consumer industry: Nestle Malaysia.” (2017).
  50. Google Scholar, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 6451

Business and Economics Journal received 6451 citations as per Google Scholar report

Business and Economics Journal peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward