Commentary - (2021) Volume 11, Issue 11
Role of Community Media in Journalism
Joseph Abhram*
*Correspondence:
Joseph Abhram, Department of Journalism, University of Auckland,
New Zealand,
Email:
Department of Journalism, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Received: 11-Nov-2021
Published:
23-Nov-2021
Citation: Joseph Abhram. "Role of Community Media in
Journalism." J Mass Communicat Journalism 11 (2021): 463.
Copyright: © 2021 Abhram J. This is an open-access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author
and source are credited.
Commentary
Community media are any sort of media that function in commission of or by
a community. it's the increase of all types of other , oppositional, participatory
and collaborative media practices that have developed within the journalistic
context of â??community media,â?? â??we media,â?? â??citizens media,â?? â??grass root
journalismâ?? or any radical alternative to on and offline mainstream journalistic
practices. In other words, it's having access to or creating local alternatives
to mainstream broadcasting like area people newspapers, radio stations, or
magazines. Community Media aids within the process of building citizenship
and raising social awareness. â??Participationâ? and â??accessâ? are an outsized
aspect within the rise of community media. those that create media are being
encouraged to involve themselves in providing a platform for others to precise
views. Community media is usually given parameters when being defined
by groups, but often challenges these boundaries with its broad yet narrow
structure. Community media play a big, but largely unacknowledged, role
in popular culture. Unlike their commercial and public service counterparts,
community media give "everyday people" access to the instruments of radio,
television, and computer-mediated communication. Through outreach,
training, and production support services, community media enhance the
democratic potential of transmission. Community media also encourage
and promote the expression of various social, political, and cultural beliefs
and practices. During this way, community media celebrate diversity amid
the homogeneity of economic media and therefore the elitism of public
service broadcasting. Most vital, perhaps, worldwide interest in community
media suggests an implicit, cross-cultural, and timeless understanding of
the profound relationship between community cohesion, social integration,
and therefore the forms and practices of communication. Despite their
growing numbers, however, community media organizations remain relatively
unknown in most societies. This obscurity is a smaller amount a measure of
community media's cultural significance, than a sign of its marginalized status
within the communications landscape. In the us, the origins of the community
radio movement are often traced to efforts of Lew Hill, founding father of
KPFA: the flagship station of the Pacifica radio network. A journalist and CO
during war II, Hill was disillusioned with the state of yank broadcasting. At
the guts of Hill's disdain for commercial radio was an astute recognition of
the economic realities of radio broadcasting. Hill understood the pressures
related to commercial broadcasting and therefore the constraints commercial
sponsorship places on a station's resources, and, ultimately, its programming.
Hill and his colleagues reasoned that noncommercial, listener supported
radio could provide A level of insulation from commercial interests that might
ensure challenging, innovative, and interesting radio. Overcoming variety
of legal, technical, and economic obstacles, KPFA-Berkeley signed on the
air in 1949. At a time of anti-Communist hysteria and other threats to the
democratic ideal of freedom of speech, KPFA and therefore the Pacifica
stations represented an important alternative to mainstream news, public
affairs, and cultural programming. Although listener-supported radio went an
extended way toward securing local enthusiasm and support for creative and
provocative programming, this model presented some problems. During the
first 1970s demands for popular participation in and access to the Pacifica
network created enormous rifts between area people members, Pacifica staff,
and station management. Con-flicts over Pacifica's direction and struggles
over the network's resources still contribute to the divisiveness that is still
somewhat synonymous with Pacifica at the top of the 20th century. Still,
KPFA and its sister stations consistently broadcast programs handling issues
considered taboo by commercial and public service broadcasters alike.
Equally important, the Pacifica experience generated remarkable enthusiasm
for alternative radio across the country. as an example , in 1962 one among
Lew Hill's protégés, Lorenzo Milam, founded KRAB, a listener-supported
community station in Seattle, Washington. Throughout the 1960s, Milam
traveled the country, providing technical and logistical support to variety of
community radio outlets: a loose consortium of community stations that came
to be referred to as the KRAB Nebula. By 1975, the National Alternative Radio
Konference (NARK) brought together artists, musicians, journalists, and
political activists with an interest in participatory, locally-oriented radio. Within
a couple of months the National Federation of Community Broadcasters
(NFCB) was established to represent the interests of the nascent community
radio movement. Committed to providing "nonprofessional" individuals and
marginalized groups with access to the airwaves, the NFCB played a pivotal
role within the rise of community radio within the us . Still active, the NFCB
continues to market noncommercial, community-based radio. Organizations
like the planet Association for Community Broadcasters (AMARC) provide
similar support services for the community radio movement worldwide.