Scoliosis Treatments: The Role of Laminectomy in Spinal Alignment

Natalia Liu^*
*Correspondence: Natalia Liu, Department of Rehabilitation, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, 00-968 Warszawa, Poland, Email:

Introduction

Scoliosis, a condition characterized by an abnormal lateral curvature of the spine, affects millions of people worldwide, with varying degrees of severity. In some cases, scoliosis can lead to discomfort, pain, and significant complications in mobility. Treatment options for scoliosis vary depending on the degree of curvature, the age of the patient, and the presence of other underlying health conditions. While conservative treatments such as physical therapy and bracing are often effective in mild cases, more severe cases may require surgical intervention to improve spinal alignment and relieve symptoms. One such surgical option is laminectomy, a procedure traditionally used to treat conditions like spinal stenosis, herniated discs, and nerve compression. However, in certain cases of scoliosis, laminectomy can play a significant role in improving spinal alignment, reducing pain, and preventing further spinal deformity. This article explores the relationship between scoliosis and laminectomy, highlighting how the procedure can impact spinal alignment and contribute to more effective scoliosis treatment [1,2].

Description

Laminectomy is a surgical procedure in which a portion of the lamina (the bony arch of a vertebra) is removed to relieve pressure on the spinal cord or nerves. While this procedure is primarily used to treat conditions like spinal stenosis, herniated discs, or nerve compression, it can also be beneficial in scoliosis cases where nerve compression or spinal deformity is contributing to pain and functional limitations. In severe cases of scoliosis, the abnormal curvature of the spine can result in compression of the spinal cord or nerve roots. This compression can lead to symptoms such as pain, numbness, weakness, and tingling in the extremities. Laminectomy can help alleviate these symptoms by removing the lamina, which may be pressing on the spinal cord or nerves. By reducing pressure in the spinal canal, laminectomy can improve nerve function and reduce the discomfort associated with scoliosisrelated nerve compression. While laminectomy alone may not correct the curvature of the spine caused by scoliosis, it can play a role in improving spinal alignment by providing space for the spinal cord and nerves. In some cases, the procedure may be combined with other surgical techniques, such as spinal fusion, to correct the curvature and stabilize the spine. By addressing nerve compression and creating more space within the spinal canal, laminectomy can help facilitate the effectiveness of other scoliosis treatments aimed at restoring proper alignment [3-5].

Conclusion

Laminectomy plays a significant role in the treatment of scoliosis, particularly in cases where nerve compression or spinal deformity is causing significant pain and functional impairment. While the procedure may not directly correct the curvature of the spine, it can improve spinal alignment, reduce nerve compression, and help alleviate the symptoms associated with severe scoliosis. Combined with other treatments such as spinal fusion, laminectomy can offer a comprehensive solution for patients with advanced scoliosis, improving their mobility, relieving pain, and enhancing their quality of life. As with any surgical procedure, careful consideration of the risks and benefits is essential to ensure the best outcomes for patients. Untreated scoliosis can lead to the progression of the curvature, which can worsen nerve compression and cause further functional impairments. By addressing spinal alignment and relieving pressure on the spinal cord and nerves, laminectomy can help prevent the condition from worsening.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Mirza, Sohail K., Richard A. Deyo, Patrick J. Heagerty and Judith A. Turner, et al. "Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: Conceptual model and pilot evaluation." BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7 (2006): 1-16.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Flexman, Alana M., Raphaële Charest-Morin, Liam Stobart and John Street, et al. "Frailty and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative spine disease." Spine J 16 (2016): 1315-1323.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Yagi, Mitsuru, Nobuyuki Fujita, Eijiro Okada and Osahiko Tsuji, et al. "Clinical outcomes, complications, and cost-effectiveness in surgically treated adult spinal deformity over 70 years: A propensity score–matched analysis." Clin Spine Surg 33 (2020): E14-E20.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Yagi, Mitsuru, Takehiro Michikawa, Satoshi Suzuki and Eijiro Okada, et al. "Characterization of patients with poor risk for clinical outcomes in adult symptomatic lumbar deformity surgery." Spine 46 (2021): 813-821.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Smith, Justin S., Christopher I. Shaffrey, Virginie Lafage and Frank Schwab, et al. "Comparison of best vs. worst clinical outcomes for adult spinal deformity surgery: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected, multicenter database with 2-year follow-up: Presented at the 2015 AANS/CNS joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves." Neurosurg Spine (2015): 349-359.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at