Sensors in Forensic Contexts for the Identification of Abused Substances

Zheng Liu^*
*Correspondence: Zheng Liu, Department of Forensic Science, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China, Email:

Introduction

In forensic science, the identification and analysis of abused substances are pivotal for solving crimes, ensuring justice and protecting public health. Abused substances, which include illicit drugs, prescription medications and toxic chemicals, can pose significant challenges in forensic investigations. The accurate identification of such substances is crucial not only for criminal prosecution but also for toxicological analysis, clinical assessments and regulatory enforcement. Traditional laboratory techniques such as chromatography and mass spectrometry have long been the gold standards in forensic analysis, but recent advancements in sensor technologies have introduced new opportunities for faster, more portable and cost-effective detection of abused substances in real-world environments. Sensors designed for forensic contexts offer the advantage of real-time, on-site detection with minimal sample preparation, which is critical in dynamic forensic investigations. These sensors are increasingly being developed to identify a wide array of abused substances with high specificity and sensitivity. From handheld devices used by law enforcement officers during roadside drug tests to lab-based sensors used for complex toxicological analyses, sensors play an indispensable role in modern forensic science. This article explores the different types of sensors used in forensic contexts, their applications in the identification of abused substances and their advantages and limitations [1,2].

Description

The field of sensors for forensic substance identification encompasses a broad range of technologies. These include chemical sensors, biosensors, optical sensors and electrochemical sensors. Each of these sensor types operates on different principles and is suited for specific forensic applications. Chemical sensors detect the presence of specific chemicals by producing a measurable response upon interaction with the target substance. These sensors are widely used for detecting Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), drugs and other toxic substances in forensic investigations. The key advantage of chemical sensors is their ability to rapidly detect a broad range of substances, often with minimal sample preparation and in real-time. Semiconductor sensors are based on materials like tin dioxide (SnO2), which undergo changes in electrical conductivity when they interact with certain gases or vapors. These sensors are commonly used for detecting gases like ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon monoxide, but they can also be modified to detect specific drug molecules such as cannabinoids, cocaine and methamphetamine. The sensors are often integrated into portable devices that allow law enforcement officers to test for drug use at crime scenes or during traffic stops [3].

Gas Chromatography (GC) sensors are designed to separate and identify chemical compounds based on their volatility and interaction with a stationary phase. While traditional GC is a labor-intensive laboratory technique, miniaturized GC sensors are now being developed for field use in forensic applications. These sensors are highly effective at detecting a wide range of substances, including narcotics, alcohol and volatile toxins, making them invaluable tools for drug testing and breath analysis. Biosensors are devices that use biological materials, such as enzymes or antibodies, to detect specific target molecules. The biological component of the sensor binds to the target substance, triggering a measurable response, typically in the form of an electrical or optical signal. Biosensors are highly selective, making them ideal for forensic applications where the identification of a specific substance is critical. Enzyme-based biosensors utilize enzymes that catalyze specific biochemical reactions, producing detectable signals in the presence of target substances. These sensors can be highly sensitive and are capable of detecting trace amounts of substances such as opioids or synthetic cannabinoids in biological samples. For example, enzymes that break down alcohol can be used in breath alcohol detectors, which are commonly used in roadside sobriety tests. Immunosensors use antibodies that bind specifically to target molecules, allowing for the detection of abused substances even at very low concentrations. These sensors are particularly useful for detecting drugs such as cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin in urine or blood samples. Immunosensors can also be used to analyze complex mixtures of substances, making them highly versatile tools for forensic laboratories [4].

Optical sensors rely on the interaction of light with matter to detect the presence and concentration of substances. When light passes through a sample, it may be absorbed, reflected, or scattered, depending on the chemical composition of the material. By analyzing these interactions, optical sensors can identify substances with high precision. SPR sensors use changes in the refractive index at the surface of a metal film when a target substance binds to it. The sensor detects this change and provides real-time, label-free analysis of chemical interactions. SPR sensors have been used in forensic applications to detect specific drug molecules in biological samples, such as blood or urine, as well as to analyze complex samples for potential toxins or drugs. Raman spectroscopy is a non-invasive optical technique that analyzes the vibrational modes of molecules when exposed to laser light. This technique provides a unique molecular fingerprint that can be used to identify substances. Raman spectroscopy is highly effective for the identification of drugs, explosives and toxins in both solid and liquid forms, making it an invaluable tool in forensic investigations. Portable Raman spectrometers are now being used by law enforcement and forensic personnel to identify narcotics and other illicit substances at crime scenes or during arrests. Electrochemical sensors measure the electrical properties of a chemical reaction, such as changes in voltage, current, or resistance, when a target substance is present. These sensors are often highly sensitive and can detect substances at low concentrations, making them ideal for forensic applications such as drug testing and toxicological analysis. Potentiometric sensors measure changes in the electrical potential between two electrodes when a target substance is present. These sensors are commonly used to detect ions in biological fluids such as blood or urine. Potentiometric sensors have been employed in the detection of substances such as alcohol, nicotine and various illicit drugs [5].

Conclusion

The integration of sensors into forensic science has revolutionized the way abused substances are identified and analyzed. From handheld devices used by law enforcement officers during roadside testing to advanced sensors employed in forensic laboratories, sensors have proven to be invaluable tools for the rapid and accurate detection of drugs, toxins and other substances involved in criminal activities. Although challenges related to specificity, sensitivity and practicality remain, ongoing advancements in sensor technology hold great promise for further improving their performance and expanding their applications. As the field of forensic science continues to evolve, the role of sensors in the identification of abused substances will only grow, offering new opportunities for crime prevention, public health monitoring and the administration of justice.

Acknowledgement

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

1. Silva, Weberson P., Raquel G. Rocha, Luciano C. Arantes and Camila D. Lima, et al. "Development of a simple and rapid screening method for the detection of 1-(3-chlorophenyl) piperazine in forensic samples." Talanta 233 (2021): 122597.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Ribeiro, Maria Fernanda M., Fátima Bento, Antonio J. Ipolito and Marcelo F. de Oliveira. "Development of a pencil drawn paper‐based analytical device to detect Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD)." J Forensic Sci 65 (2020): 2121-2128.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Barfidokht, Abbas, Rupesh K. Mishra, Rajesh Seenivasan and Shuyang Liu, et al. "Wearable electrochemical glove-based sensor for rapid and on-site detection of fentanyl." Sens Actuators B Chem 296 (2019): 126422.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Mishra, Rupesh K., Juliane R. Sempionatto, Zhanhong Li and Christopher Brown, et al. "Simultaneous detection of salivary Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and alcohol using a Wearable Electrochemical Ring Sensor." Talanta 211 (2020): 120757.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Koh, Eun Hye, Won-Chul Lee, Yeong-Jin Choi and Joung-Il Moon, et al. "A wearable surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor for label-free molecular detection." ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13 (2021): 3024-3032.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at