Sonographic Features for Evaluating Thyroid Nodules with Halos

Fukumoto Fujioka^*
*Correspondence: Fukumoto Fujioka, Department of Oncology, International Christian University, Mitaka Tokyo, Japan, Email:

Introduction

Thyroid nodules with halos through Sonographic features are a nuanced process that holds critical importance in distinguishing between benign and malignant nodules. A halo, in the context of thyroid imaging, is defined as a hypo echoic rim that partially or completely surrounds a thyroid nodule. This feature has been studied extensively because it provides valuable insights into the nodule's nature and underlying pathology. The halo can result from compressed thyroid parenchyma, fibrosis, inflammatory changes, or vascular patterns around the nodule [1]. However, the interpretation of a halo is highly dependent on its morphology, completeness, and associated Sonographic features. Benign thyroid nodules, such as colloid nodules or adenomas, are more likely to exhibit a complete, thin halo. This appearance is thought to reflect compressed thyroid tissue and is typically uniform in thickness. The presence of a complete halo is often considered a reassuring feature and may reduce the likelihood of malignancy. Conversely, malignant nodules, such as papillary or follicular thyroid carcinomas, often lack a complete halo. When halos are present in malignant nodules, they are frequently incomplete, irregular, or thickened. This irregularity may be due to infiltration of surrounding tissue or disrupted vascular patterns caused by the tumour’s growth [2].

Description

The echogenicity of a nodule also plays a significant role in the evaluation process. Hypoechoic nodules are more likely to be malignant, especially when combined with an absent or incomplete halo. In contrast, isochoric or hyperechoic nodules with a complete halo are more likely to be benign. Microcalcifications, another critical feature, are often seen in malignant nodules and can override the benign implications of a halo. These calcifications, appearing as tiny echogenic foci without shadowing, are associated with psammoma bodies commonly found in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Vascular patterns observed through Doppler ultrasound further enhance the diagnostic utility of halo evaluation. Benign nodules typically exhibit peripheral vascularity, corresponding to a complete halo. This pattern suggests that the blood supply is confined to the periphery of the nodule, consistent with its encapsulated nature. In contrast, malignant nodules often display central vascularity or a mixed vascular pattern. Central vascularity, in particular, indicates the infiltration of tumor cells into the nodule's core and is a strong predictor of malignancy [3].

The advent of advanced imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and elastography, has improved the assessment of thyroid nodules with halos. CEUS allows for detailed evaluation of vascular patterns by using micro bubble contrast agents. Studies have shown that malignant nodules exhibit irregular, chaotic vascularization patterns on CEUS, even in the presence of a halo. This contrasts with the uniform vascularity seen in benign nodules. Elastography, on the other hand, measures tissue stiffness and provides a quantitative assessment of nodule consistency. Malignant nodules tend to be stiffer than benign ones, and this feature can complement halo analysis to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Despite the utility of these imaging features, it is essential to consider the halo sign within the broader clinical and sonographic context. While a complete halo is generally indicative of benignity, it is not an absolute criterion. Similarly, an incomplete or absent halo does not confirm malignancy. These features must be interpreted alongside other sonographic criteria, including nodule size, margins, and the presence of extra thyroidal extension. Fineneedle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis and is often recommended for nodules with suspicious features, regardless of the halo's appearance. The significance of a halo also varies depending on the underlying pathology of the nodule. Follicular adenomas, for example, often exhibit a complete halo, but follicular carcinomas can appear similar, necessitating further evaluation through FNAB or histopathology. The diagnostic challenge is further compounded by the overlap in features between benign and malignant nodules, underscoring the need for a multidisciplinary approach. Combining radiological findings with clinical history, laboratory tests, and cytological analysis enhances diagnostic confidence and guides appropriate management [4].

In clinical practice, the halo sign is a valuable tool for risk stratification and decision-making. Nodules with a complete halo and no other suspicious features may be monitored with periodic ultrasound, avoiding unnecessary interventions. On the other hand, nodules with an incomplete halo, irregular margins, or associated suspicious features warrant closer evaluation and possibly FNAB. The integration of advanced imaging techniques and comprehensive assessment protocols has significantly improved the ability to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes [5].

Conclusion

Sonographic evaluation of thyroid nodules with halos involves a detailed analysis of multiple features, including halo morphology, echogenicity, vascular patterns, and associated sonographic findings. While the presence of a complete halo is often reassuring, it is not definitive for benignity. Similarly, an incomplete or absent halo raises suspicion but requires correlation with other imaging and clinical data. Advanced imaging modalities like CEUS and elastography have further refined the diagnostic process, providing additional layers of information to guide clinical decisions. By adopting a multidisciplinary and systematic approach, clinicians can optimize the evaluation of thyroid nodules with halos, ensuring accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Rago Teresa and Paolo Vitti. "Role of thyroid ultrasound in the diagnostic evaluation of thyroid nodules." EnM 22 (2008): 913-928.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Chen Xue-jun, Lin-jin Huang, Feng Mao and Hai-xia Yuan, et al. "Value of CEUS features in diagnosing thyroid nodules with halo sign on B-mode ultrasound." BMC 23 (2023): 11.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Hamill Conor, Peter Ellis and Philip C. Johnston. "Ultrasound for the assessment of thyroid nodules: An overview for non-radiologists." Br J Hosp Med 83 (2022): 1-7.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Koike Eisuke, Shiro Noguchi, Hiroyuki Yamashita and Tsukasa Murakami, et al. "Ultrasonographic characteristics of thyroid nodules: Prediction of malignancy." Arch Surg 136 (2001): 334-337.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Xu Shang-Yan, Wei-Wei Zhan and Wen-Han Wang. "Evaluation of thyroid nodules by a scoring and categorizing method based on sonographic features." J Med Ultrasound 34 (2015): 2179-2185.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at