GET THE APP

Stress, Flexibility, And Career Success Factors in the Health Economics
..

Journal of Global Economics

ISSN: 2375-4389

Open Access

Mini Review - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 7

Stress, Flexibility, And Career Success Factors in the Health Economics

Alan E H Speight*
*Correspondence: Alan E H Speight, Department of Business and Economics, Swansea University, England, UK, Email:
Department of Business and Economics, Swansea University, England, UK

Received: 02-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. economics -22-78548; Editor assigned: 04-Jul-2022, Pre QC No. P-78548; Reviewed: 16-Jul-2022, QC No. Q-78548; Revised: 21-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. R-78548; Published: 28-Jul-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2375-4389.2022.10.362
Citation: Speight, Alan EH. “Stress, Flexibility, and Career Success Factors in the Health Economics.” J Glob Econ 10 (2022): 362.
Copyright: © 2022 Speight AEH. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Examining Job Satisfaction, Health Economics is an applied topic of study that enables a methodical and thorough analysis of the challenges associated with attaining universal health. Health economics seeks to comprehend how people, healthcare professionals, public and private organisations, and governments behave when making decisions by applying economic theories of consumer, producer, and social choice.

Keywords

Health economics • Research economics • Clinical environments

Introduction

Through the analysis of healthcare providers, hospitals, clinics, managed care, and public health promotion initiatives, health economics is utilised to encourage healthy lives and successful health outcomes. The Department of International Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health offers an in Global Health Economics degree programme that employs health economic principles to solve global concerns like migration, displaced persons, climate change, vaccine access, injuries, and more. Outcomes Research, And Market Access Profession Based on a Global Cross-Sectional Study. Since Arrow's foundational essay on health economics from the scale of the healthcare sector, the share of public finances allocated to health care, and the body of research on health economics have all expanded rapidly. The need for health insurance was sparked by Arrow's emphasis on the significance of uncertainty. The theoretical growth of health economics was supported by later advances in information economics, such as the potential of no equilibrium in the insurance market due to selection. Arrow also stressed the doctor's function as the patient's agent, and much later research examined the influence of the doctor's financial and other incentives on behaviour. The significant variance in operation rates across doctors with equal financial incentives demonstrates the significance of non-financial motivations. The primary focus of health economics is efficiency or getting the most out of the resources that are available (or ensuring benefits gained exceed benefits forgone). Concerns of equity, such as how resources should be allocated fairly, are also acknowledged. Equity factors frequently clash with efficiency rules. However, due to the contentious nature of this field and the challenges associated with quantifying equitable features, health economists' work has not primarily focused on this aspect [1-3].

Description

The economic model is significant because it offers valuable insights into how health care might be organised and paid and because it offers a framework to explicitly and consistently address a wide range of challenges. An increase in interest in the topic and its impact on how health care is organised and decisions are made is the result of organisational changes including the creation of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence and the devolution of decision-making to primary care organisations. The study of efficiency, effectiveness, value, and behaviour in the production and use of health care and other services is known as health economics. In order to improve health outcomes and lifestyle choices through interactions between people, healthcare professionals, and clinical environments, health economics is crucial. Health economists often research how healthcare systems operate and how certain behaviours like smoking, diabetes, and obesity affect people's health.

The fact that healthcare economics deviates from standard economic principles is one of the largest challenges. The third-party payer mechanism used by insurance companies and employers frequently conceals Price and Quality. After the Second World War, medical and health expenses skyrocketed due to a number of factors, including the ageing of the population, the sharp rise in chronic diseases, the improvement in the public's demand for health care, the rapid advancement of medical research technology, the modernization of diagnosis and treatment methods, and the modernization of health facilities and equipment. The fact that overall U.S. health spending has continually climbed as a percentage of for instance, illustrates the elevated status that society accords to health care in comparison to other non-health-related commodities and services. There are significant variations from the assumptions made in textbook models of economic marketplaces, notwithstanding this. In risk pools, which several states have established, participants who are generally healthy help pay for the care of the others. The risk pool may be destroyed by adverse selection, which occurs when insurers are unable to accurately forecast the enrolees’ medical costs. Group purchases, preferential selection ("cherrypicking"), and pre-existing condition exclusions are examples of features of insurance market risk pools designed to address adverse selection. Patients with insurance naturally worry less about healthcare costs than they would if they had to pay the whole cost of care [4-5].

Conclusion

Pharmacoeconomics, labour economics, welfare economics, and other fields are all included in the field of mental health economics. The capacity of those who are impacted to contribute as human capital makes a clear connection between mental health and economics possible. In their article "Mental Health in Childhood and Human Capital," Currie and Stabile examined how frequent childhood mental health issues may impair the development of affected children's human capital. The impact that impacted people have on the local human capital, such as at the job or in the home, is an example of an externality. The individual is also impacted by the economy, especially in light of globalisation. For instance, studies in India, where western outsourcing is becoming more common, have shown a rising hybrid economy.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Awan, Abdul Majid, Muhammad Azam and Imran Ullah Saeed, "Does globalization and financial sector development affect environmental quality? A panel data investigation for the Middle East and North African countries." Environ Sci Pollut Res 27 (2020): 45405-45418.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Ahmed, Zahoor, Zhaohua Wang and Faisal Mahmood, et al."Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia." Environ Sci Pollut Res 26 (2019): 18565-18582.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Ahmed, Zahoor, Muhammad Mansoor Asghar, Muhammad Nasir Malik and Kishwar Nawaz. "Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China." Resour policy 67 (2020): 101677.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Ali, Rafaqet, Khuda Bakhsh, and Muhammad Asim Yasin. "Impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economy: evidence from Pakistan." Sustain Cities Soc 48 (2019): 101553.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Aeknarajindawat, Natnaporn. "The impact of natural resources, renewable energy, economic growth on carbon dioxide emission in Malaysia." (2020).
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1931

Journal of Global Economics received 1931 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Global Economics peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward