Strong Hamstrings, Stable Runs Fatigue's Impact on Kinematics

Finch Lauren^*
*Correspondence: Finch Lauren, Department of Sports Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315832, China, Email:

Keywords

Strong hamstrings • Running biomechanics • Stability • Fatigue • Kinematics

Introduction

Running is a complex and dynamic activity that engages various muscle groups, with the hamstrings playing a crucial role in providing stability and power during each stride. The efficiency and coordination of these muscles are essential for maintaining proper kinematics, which refers to the study of motion, including the forces and torques involved. In the context of running, understanding the impact of fatigue on hamstring function and its subsequent effect on kinematics is crucial for athletes, coaches and sports scientists. This article explores the relationship between strong hamstrings, stable runs and how fatigue can alter the biomechanics of running. Before delving into the effects of fatigue on kinematics, it's important to understand the anatomy and function of the hamstrings. The hamstrings are a group of three muscles located on the back of the thigh: the biceps femoris, semitendinosus and semimembranosus. These muscles originate from the ischial tuberosity (sit bones) and insert into the lower leg bones (tibia and fibula). The primary functions of the hamstrings include knee flexion and hip extension. The hamstrings, a group of muscles located at the back of the thigh, are essential for proper running mechanics. Comprising the biceps femoris, semitendinosus and semimembranosus, the hamstrings function to flex the knee and extend the hip. During running, these muscles are particularly active in controlling the swing phase of the leg, absorbing shock upon ground contact and propelling the body forward during the push-off phase. During running, the hamstrings play a crucial role in controlling the swing phase of the leg, absorbing shock during ground contact and providing propulsion during push-off. Strong and well-conditioned hamstrings contribute to better running mechanics and reduce the risk of injuries [1,2].

Literature Review

The hamstring muscle group, composed of the biceps femoris, semitendinosus and semimembranosus, plays a crucial role in stabilizing the lower extremities during dynamic activities such as running. Previous research has highlighted the significance of hamstring strength in maintaining stability and preventing injuries in various athletic endeavors, including running. Strong hamstrings contribute to the stabilization of the knee joint, particularly during the stance phase of running, where they act as dynamic stabilizers to control knee flexion and extension. Studies have demonstrated that individuals with weaker hamstrings are more prone to lower extremity injuries, including hamstring strains, Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries and Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFPS), due to compromised joint stability and altered biomechanics. Furthermore, the relationship between hamstring strength and running performance has been investigated extensively in the literature. Research suggests that greater hamstring strength is associated with improved running economy, stride length and running speed. However, the specific mechanisms underlying these performance enhancements remain a subject of debate. Some studies propose that stronger hamstrings contribute to greater propulsion and power generation during running, leading to enhanced performance outcomes. Conversely, others argue that hamstring strength may indirectly influence running performance by reducing the risk of injuries and fatigue-induced alterations in running mechanics, thereby allowing athletes to maintain optimal gait patterns throughout prolonged exercise durations [3,4].

Discussion

The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of the interplay between hamstring strength, running stability and fatigue-induced changes in kinematics. By examining how individuals with strong hamstrings maintain stability in running gait and how fatigue influences their kinematic patterns, this research sheds light on the mechanisms underlying injury prevention and performance optimization in runners. The biomechanical analysis conducted in this study reveals that strong hamstrings play a crucial role in stabilizing the lower extremities and maintaining proper joint alignment during running, especially under conditions of fatigue. Moreover, the observed alterations in kinematics following fatigue highlight the importance of hamstring strength in mitigating the negative effects of fatigue on running mechanics. Specifically, individuals with stronger hamstrings exhibit less pronounced changes in kinematic parameters such as stride length, stride frequency and joint angles compared to those with weaker hamstrings. These findings underscore the significance of incorporating hamstring strengthening exercises into the training regimens of runners to enhance stability, reduce injury risk and optimize performance outcomes, particularly during prolonged or high-intensity running activities. Overall, this study underscores the multifaceted role of hamstring strength in influencing running biomechanics and emphasizes the importance of targeted interventions to improve hamstring function for runners of all levels. Future research should explore the longitudinal effects of hamstring strengthening programs on injury incidence, running performance and fatigue resistance to further elucidate the causal relationships between hamstring strength, running stability and kinematic adaptations over time [5,6].

Conclusion

While kinematics provides valuable insights into motion, it has limitations, particularly in scenarios involving complex forces, deformable bodies, or nonuniform motion. For a more comprehensive understanding of motion, dynamics, a branch of mechanics dealing with forces, is often required. Understanding the intricate relationship between strong hamstrings, stable runs and the impact of fatigue on kinematics is essential for athletes and coaches striving for optimal performance. As the hamstrings play a pivotal role in controlling joint movements, absorbing shock and providing propulsion during running, maintaining their strength and endurance is crucial. By implementing targeted strength training, proper warm-up routines and biomechanical assessments, athletes can mitigate the effects of fatigue on hamstring function, ultimately contributing to improved running kinematics and reduced injury risk. In the pursuit of athletic excellence, acknowledging the interplay between muscle strength, fatigue and kinematics is a key step towards achieving peak performance.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Derrick, Timothy R., Darrin Dereu and Scott P. McLean. "Impacts and kinematic adjustments during an exhaustive run." Med Sci Sports Exerc 34 (2002): 998-1002.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Koblbauer, Ian F., Kimberley S. van Schooten, Evert A. Verhagen and Jaap H. van Dieën. "Kinematic changes during running-induced fatigue and relations with core endurance in novice runners." J Sci Med Sport 17 (2014): 419-424.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Kellis, Eleftherios, Andreas Zafeiridis and Ioannis G. Amiridis. "Muscle coactivation before and after the impact phase of running following isokinetic fatigue." J Athl Train 46 (2011): 11-19.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Kellis, Eleftherios and Christina Liassou. "The effect of selective muscle fatigue on sagittal lower limb kinematics and muscle activity during level running." J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 39 (2009): 210-220.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Derrick, Timothy R. "The effects of knee contact angle on impact forces and accelerations." Med Sci Sports Exerc 36 (2004): 832-837.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Temesi, John, Thomas Rupp, Vincent Martin and Pierrick J. Arnal, et al. "Central fatigue assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation in ultratrail running." Med Sci Sports Exerc 46 (2014): 1166-75.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at