Structural Genomics: Target Selection and Function Determination

Sajna Bonsle^*
*Correspondence: Sajna Bonsle, Department of Biotechnology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, Kerala, India, Email:

Introduction

Structural genomics aims to determine the three-dimensional structures of all proteins in an organism, providing valuable insights into their functions and facilitating drug discovery efforts. However, selecting appropriate targets for structural determination and deciphering their functions pose significant challenges. This article discusses the process of target selection in structural genomics and the strategies employed to determine protein function. It explores the role of bioinformatics, high-throughput experimental techniques, and functional assays in guiding target selection and function assignment. Additionally, it highlights the importance of integrating structural genomics data with other omics approaches to gain a comprehensive understanding of protein function and biological processes, Structural genomics aims to determine the structures of proteins on a large scale, providing a structural blueprint of the proteome. However, deciphering the functions of these proteins is equally crucial. Target selection is a critical step in structural genomics, involving the identification and prioritization of proteins for structural determination. Determining protein function requires the integration of various experimental and computational approaches. This article explores the challenges and strategies involved in target selection and function determination in structural genomics [1].

Description

Protein families and conserved domains: Target selection often focuses on proteins belonging to specific families or containing conserved domains. These proteins are more likely to provide insights into broader functional and evolutionary aspects. Proteins associated with diseases, drug targets, or known biological pathways are often prioritized in target selection. These proteins have immediate biomedical relevance and can guide drug discovery efforts. Selecting targets that are challenging to solve structurally, such as membrane proteins or large complexes, can advance the development of new experimental techniques and methodologies in structural biology. Ensuring a balanced representation of proteins across different functional classes and evolutionary families is important to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the proteome. Comparative genomics approaches, including sequence similarity searches and phylogenetic analysis, can provide clues about protein function by identifying homologous proteins with known functions [2].

Challenges and future directions: Improving the accuracy of protein function prediction remains a significant challenge due to the diversity of protein functions and the limitations of computational methods. Experimental validation of predicted protein functions is essential to confirm their accuracy and biological relevance. Integrating structural genomics data with other omics data, along with advanced data integration and analysis techniques, will enhance our understanding of protein function and biological processes. Continued technological advancements in high-throughput structural biology techniques, such as cryo-EM and advances in protein engineering, will facilitate rapid and accurate determination of protein structures and functional annotation [3-5].

Conclusion

While structural genomics offers significant advancements in understanding protein function and aiding drug discovery, ethical considerations must be taken into account. The use of human or animal samples, data privacy, and potential misuse of structural information for harmful purposes are important ethical concerns. It is essential to adhere to ethical guidelines, obtain informed consent, and ensure responsible data management and sharing practices in structural genomics research. Target selection and determination of function are critical steps in structural genomics. Combining bioinformatics analyses, high-throughput experimental techniques, and integrative approaches with other omics data provides a comprehensive understanding of protein function and its role in biological processes. Advancements in structural genomics will contribute to drug discovery, functional annotation of genomes, and our understanding of complex biological systems.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Churchill, Gary A and RW1206241 Doerge. "Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping." Genetics 138 (1994): 963-971.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Connor, E. E., T. S. Sonstegard, M. S. Ashwell and G. L. Bennett, et al. "An expanded comparative map of bovine chromosome 27 targeting dairy form QTL regions."  Anim Genet 35 (2004): 265-269.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Djian-Caporalino, Caroline, Ariane Fazari, Marie-Jeanne Arguel and Tatiana Vernié, et al. "Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) Me resistance genes in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) are clustered on the P9 chromosome."  Theor Appl Genet 114 (2007): 473-486.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Duran, Y., R. Fratini, P. Garcia and M. Perez De La Vega. "An intersubspecific genetic map of Lens." Theor Appl Genet 108 (2004): 1265-1273.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Emara, M. G and H. Kim. "Genetic markers and their application in poultry breeding."  Poult Sci 82 (2003): 952-957.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at