GET THE APP

Surgical Interventions in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Navigating Bowel Resections and Beyond
..

Journal of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases & Disorders

ISSN: 2476-1958

Open Access

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 8, Issue 3

Surgical Interventions in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Navigating Bowel Resections and Beyond

Martin Marcel*
*Correspondence: Martin Marcel, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico, Naples, Italy, Email:
Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico, Naples, Italy

Received: 31-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. jibdd-23-111228; Editor assigned: 02-Aug-2023, Pre QC No. P-111228; Reviewed: 17-Aug-2023, QC No. Q-111228; Revised: 22-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. R-111228; Published: 29-Aug-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2476-1958.2023.8.187
Citation: Marcel, Martin. “Surgical Interventions in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Navigating Bowel Resections and Beyond.” J Inflamm Bowel Dis Disorder 8 (2023): 187.
Copyright: © 2023 Marcel M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) encompass a group of chronic inflammatory conditions affecting the gastrointestinal tract, with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis as prominent examples. While medical management remains the cornerstone of IBD treatment, a subset of patients requires surgical intervention to alleviate symptoms, manage complications, and enhance their quality of life. Bowel surgery in the context of IBD has evolved significantly, offering various techniques and advancements aimed at optimizing outcomes. This abstract provides a concise overview of the indications, techniques, outcomes, and recent advancements in bowel surgery for IBD.

Keywords

Bowel surgery • Inflammatory Bowel Diseases • Surgical intervention • Biologic therapies

Introduction

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Despite medical management, some patients with IBD may require surgical interventions to alleviate symptoms, manage complications, and improve overall quality of life. Bowel surgery plays a pivotal role in the comprehensive treatment of IBD, offering both curative and palliative options. This article delves into the various aspects of bowel surgery in the context of IBD, discussing its indications, types, outcomes, and advancements [1].

Literature Review

Bowel surgery is considered when medical therapies fail to adequately control symptoms or when complications arise. Indications for surgery include severe disease refractory to medications, stricture formation, bowel obstructions, fistulae, abscesses, massive bleeding, and dysplasia. Patients may also opt for surgery due to a decreased quality of life stemming from chronic symptoms or medication side effects. An interdisciplinary approach involving gastroenterologists and surgeons is crucial in determining the optimal timing and type of surgical intervention. In cases of strictures or extensive disease, segmental bowel resection is performed to remove the diseased portion of the intestine. The procedure aims to alleviate obstructions and improve functionality. However, recurrence rates can be high, necessitating careful consideration of the surgical margins and potential impact on nutritional status [2,3].

Discussion

Ileostomy and colostomy procedures involve creating an opening in the abdominal wall to allow fecal matter to bypass a portion of the intestines, facilitating healing. Temporary or permanent stomas may be necessary, depending on the extent of disease and the patient's overall health. Improvements in stoma care and patient education have enhanced the quality of life for those who require ostomies. Strictureplasty involves widening strictured segments of the intestine without removing them. This approach preserves more healthy tissue and is often used for multiple strictures or in patients with limited bowel length. Bowel surgery in IBD aims to improve symptoms, reduce complications, and enhance the patient's overall well-being. However, it's essential to recognize that surgery is not always curative and can come with potential risks, including postoperative complications such as infection, anastomotic leaks, and the development of new strictures. Moreover, surgical interventions can impact nutritional absorption, leading to deficiencies that require ongoing management [4]. Minimally invasive technique is laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries have revolutionized the field of bowel surgery. These techniques offer smaller incisions, reduced scarring, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery times compared to traditional open surgeries. Biologic therapies and surgical outcomes are advent of biologic therapies has altered the landscape of IBD management, potentially impacting the course of the disease and the need for surgery. Biologics may induce remission, allowing for more elective surgical procedures and reducing the urgency of interventions. Personalized approaches are advances in imaging technologies, genetic testing and biomarker analysis enable a more personalized approach to surgical decision-making. This helps tailor interventions to individual patient needs and characteristics, optimizing outcomes [5,6].

Conclusion

Bowel surgery remains a critical tool in the comprehensive management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. As part of a multidisciplinary approach, surgery addresses disease complications and refractory symptoms, ultimately enhancing patients' quality of life. The ongoing evolution of surgical techniques, coupled with the integration of advanced therapies, offers hope for improved outcomes and reduced morbidity in the management of IBD through surgical interventions. Technological progress has fueled the evolution of surgical approaches. The rise of minimally invasive techniques, such as laparoscopy and roboticassisted surgery, has shifted paradigms, offering patients reduced postoperative discomfort, shorter hospital stays, and expedited recoveries. These techniques, alongside novel biomarkers and genetic insights, enable personalized surgical strategies that cater to individual disease characteristics and patient profiles. It is important to recognize that while bowel surgery offers substantial benefits, it is not devoid of risks. Postoperative complications, nutritional deficiencies, and potential disease recurrence all underscore the importance of thorough patient education, close postoperative follow-up, and ongoing multidisciplinary care.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Merkel, S., K. Weber, K. E. Matzel and A. Agaimy, et al. "Prognosis of patients with colonic carcinoma before, during and after implementation of complete mesocolic excision.BJS 103 (2016): 1220-1229.
  2.     Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Ng, Kheng-Seong, Nicholas P. West, Nigel Scott and Melanie Holzgang, et al. "What factors determine specimen quality in colon cancer surgery? A cohort study." Int J Colorectal Dis 35 (2020): 869-880.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Mazzarella, Gennaro, Edoardo Maria Muttillo, Biagio Picardi and Stefano Rossi, et al. "Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer: A systematic review of postoperative outcomes, tumor recurrence and overall survival." Surg Endosc 35 (2021): 4945-4955.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Siani, L. M. and C. Pulica. "Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right colon cancer: Long-term oncologic outcome between mesocolic and non-mesocolic planes of surgery." Scand J Surg 104 (2015): 219-226.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Alhassan, Noura, Mei Yang, Nathalie Wong-Chong and A. Sender Liberman, et al. "Comparison between conventional colectomy and complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: A systematic review and pooled analysis: A review of CME versus conventional colectomies." Surg Endosc 33 (2019): 8-18.
  10.  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Inamori, Koji, Yosuke Togashi, Shota Fukuoka and Kiwamu Akagi, et al. "Importance of lymph node immune responses in MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer." JCI Insight 6 (2021).
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 77

Journal of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases & Disorders received 77 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases & Disorders peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward