GET THE APP

Systems Biology Analysis are Based on Bioprocess Optimization
..

Molecular Biology: Open Access

ISSN: 2168-9547

Open Access

Short Communication - (2023) Volume 12, Issue 2

Systems Biology Analysis are Based on Bioprocess Optimization

Lianju Ma*
*Correspondence: Lianju Ma, Department of Life Sciences, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China, Email:
Department of Life Sciences, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China

Received: 01-Feb-2023, Manuscript No. MBL-23-90787; Editor assigned: 02-Feb-2023, Pre QC No. P-90787; Reviewed: 14-Feb-2023, QC No. Q-90787; Revised: 20-Feb-2023, Manuscript No. R-90787; Published: 27-Feb-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2168-9547.2023.12.370
Citation: Ma, Lianju. “Systems Biology Analysis are Based on Bioprocess Optimization.” Mol Bio 12 (2023): 370.
Copyright: © 2023 Ma L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Over the course of many centuries, various technologies, including optical and electronic microscopes, have focused on cells, which produce distinct forms of visual output. Electronic and especially molecular images are more difficult to conceptualize and evaluate than those produced by optical technologies, which produce images "evident to the eye." In order to document the transition from microscopic images to non-traditional visual technologies around my study applies the semiotic approach to the production of images in cell biology. I argue that a shift from iconic to symbolic forms is a part of the visual shift that comes with the rise of molecular biology. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that control important aspects of cell physiology is the driving passion of molecular cell biologists, but this ambition is frequently constrained by the wealth of molecular details that are currently known about these mechanisms. Our intuitive notions of how molecular regulatory networks might respond under normal and stressful conditions are overwhelmed by their complexity. We need a new way of connecting molecular biology and cell physiology in order to move forward. In order to link the qualitative characteristics of dynamical systems, as depicted by "bifurcation diagrams," with "signal response" curves measured by cell biologists, our strategy makes use of precise mathematical methods [1].

Description

Snippets from sections titled "The Curse of Complexity" and "The Curse of Parameter Space" Molecular biologists use data gathered from cell physiology, biochemistry, and molecular genetics to create intricate gene–protein interaction networks that they believe may be responsible for the essential and frequently baffling behavior of living cells. There are significant difficulties associated with these networks, such as the molecular interaction map of the budding yeast cell cycle. From a static diagram, how can we imagine the astonishing variety of temporal responses of a living cell? Can we be sure that Bypassing the Curses isn't a problem? The qualitative theory of dynamical systems doesn't see a set of ODEs as a problem for computer-based numerical simulation. Instead, dynamical systems theorists comprehend that the ODEs define a "vector field" in a multidimensional state space (the n-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system spanned by the n variables that make up the underlying biochemical network, which are mRNAs and proteins). Bistability As an illustration, consider the control of mitotic division cycles in frog eggs and frog egg extracts. The ODEs attach a small vector to each point in this state space. The activity of a cyclin-dependent kinase serves as the foundation for the hypothetical network that is in charge of these cycles (upper left of the figure). CyclinB heterodimer (also referred to as MPF) and its partners in interaction. The network diagram can be reduced to a set of ten differential equations with parameter values that are not clearly defined [2].

The key to Oscillations Sustained oscillations can be found in many aspects of cell biology, such as the oscillations of cAMP in cell signaling, the oscillations of hormones in organismal physiology, and the ubiquitous circadian rhythms that are found in the majority of organisms that are exposed. We will use a recent model of the mammalian circadian clock by Kim and Forger to demonstrate the "dynamical perspective" because cellular oscillations have long been a favorite subject for mathematical biologists. The body's circadian system Extending the Paradigm If this "paradigm" is true, then the theory of bifurcations in dynamical systems and an understanding of the fundamental principles of cellular signaling are closely linked. The nonlinear differential equations of biochemical kinetics provide an adequate description of the underlying molecular control systems that underlie all cell behaviors, despite the fact that they may appear bafflingly complex. Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives: A living cell is a dynamical system governed by nonlinear interactions between genes, proteins, and metabolites in time and space. These bifurcations must be the source of the signal-response characteristics of cells. The human mind has a very hard time understanding, if not impossible, how these cellular control systems respond to the many different conditions cells go through in the laboratory, or how the system will respond to new conditions in the lab or in the wild [3].

Shear stress of physiological flows in the human body plays a crucial role in maintaining the structure and functions of single cells and multicellular organs. This is the only way to begin making accurate and reliable assessments. The in-vitro recapitulation of intricate biochemical and mechanical cues has recently benefited greatly from the widespread use of microfluidic technologiesThe various physiological flows that are present in the human body are first discussed, followed by an explanation of how microfluidics modeled FSS in vitro and its applications to cell biology, disease modeling, and drug development. The most common mammalian cell line utilized for the production of biotherapeutic proteins, most frequently monoclonal antibody (mAb) glycoproteins, are Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Over 70% of recombinant therapeutic proteins are produced. The ability to produce post-translational modifications that are comparable to those found in humans is one of the many advantages of CHO cell production. Genomic instability, which can result in unfavorable shifts in product quality and productivity as the population doubling level (PDL) rises is one major drawback. Recombination or epigenetic silencing is two common explanations for this. The recent emergence of systems biology has provided researchers with additional tools to enhance their comprehension of the physiology of CHO cells, in addition to improving product quality and productivity through bioprocess optimization [4].

Predictive models can reveal cellular mechanisms that influence recombinant protein productivity with the increasing availability of "omics" data. With this knowledge and simple targeted gene editing techniques, well-established methods for increasing productivity and product quality have greatly improved. Using advances in genetic engineering (knockouts and targeted insertions) to incorporate synthetic parts into the CHO cell genome, allowing for greater control over the cellular environment, and developing new capabilities on the cellular level that are not present in classically derived cell lines will serve as the next "tool" for progress. In this article, we will discuss recent advancements in enhancing the production of recombinant proteins from CHO cells and explain how synthetic biology approaches will be crucial to future advancements. Snippets from the section Systems biology analysis and targeted engineering are based on bioprocess optimization. Bioprocess optimization has increased protein titers to as high as 10 g L1 for some proteins. This was made possible by enhancing chemically defined media, feeding strategies, and other culturing methods. Bioprocesses have recently been improved to improve product quality, particularly glycosylation, in addition to titer and specific productivity of recombinant proteins. Changes in monoclonal antibody N-linked glycosylation, particularly at conserved sites. Genome engineering efforts High specific productivity of recombinant proteins has traditionally been achieved by gene amplification using either a glutathione synthase/methionine sulfoximine (GS/ MSX) or dihydrofolate reductase/methotrexate (DHFR/MTX) selection system [5].

Conclusion

The gene of interest (GOI) is quasi-randomly integrated and then subjected to time-consuming screening in these methods. Methods for engineering sitespecific cell lines, such as protein-based zinc finger nucleases, or ZFNs like a transcription activator the next step is: incorporating synthetic components with the intention of designing rather than screening for a desired phenotype will result in the next generation of improvements toward a CHO cell system with sustained high productivity and tunable product quality parameters. Synthetic genetic circuits offer a method of dynamic and tunable Future directions. The next wave of progress in the production of recombinant proteins by CHO cells will come from a greater control of cellular physiology. Utilization of synthetic biology by promoter, terminator, and transcription factor engineering has been studied to improve protein production in mammalian systems. With systems biology insight and tools that enable hyper-precise genetic editing (such as "search and replace epigenetic editing, dynamic control of gene expression through "parts" development rapid and robust control over physiological processes will be possible. Advancements in the incorporation of new information into the genetic code.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Pratte, Zoe A., Marc Besson, Rebecca D. Hollman and Frank J. Stewart. "The gills of reef fish support a distinct microbiome influenced by host-specific factors." Appl Environ Microbiol 84 (2018): e00063-18.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Mäki, Anita, Pauliina Salmi, Anu Mikkonen and Anke Kremp, et al. "Sample preservation, DNA or RNA extraction and data analysis for high-throughput phytoplankton community sequencing." Front Microbiol 8 (2017): 1848.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Coppin, Franck, Nicolas Goascoz, Didier Le Roy and Carolina Giraldo. "Compte-rendu provisoire de la campagne CGFS 2019 sur le N/O Thalassa, CGFS 2019-Survey Report." (2019).
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. International Bottom Trawl Survey Working Group. "Manual for the International Bottom Trawl Surveys. Revision IX." (2015).
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Brauge, Thomas, Christine Faille, Guylaine Leleu and Catherine Denis, et al. "Treatment with disinfectants may induce an increase in viable but non culturable populations of Listeria monocytogenes in biofilms formed in smoked salmon processing environments." Food Microbiol 92 (2020): 103548.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 607

Molecular Biology: Open Access received 607 citations as per Google Scholar report

Molecular Biology: Open Access peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward