GET THE APP

The Cost-effectiveness of Treatment Optimization with Biomarkers for Immunotherapy
..

Pharmacoeconomics: Open Access

ISSN: 2472-1042

Open Access

Commentary - (2024) Volume 9, Issue 1

The Cost-effectiveness of Treatment Optimization with Biomarkers for Immunotherapy

Kohe Fujta*
*Correspondence: Kohe Fujta, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Center for Respiratory Diseases, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan, Email:
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Center for Respiratory Diseases, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan

Received: 01-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. PE-24-130442; Editor assigned: 03-Jan-2024, Pre QC No. P-130442; Reviewed: 15-Jan-2024, QC No. Q-130442; Revised: 20-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. R-130442; Published: 29-Jan-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2472-1042.2024.9.201
Citation: The Cost-effectiveness of Treatment Optimization with Biomarkers for Immunotherapy
Copyright: © 2024 Fujta K. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment by harnessing the body's immune system to fight cancer cells. While immunotherapy has shown remarkable efficacy across various cancer types, not all patients respond equally to treatment. Biomarkers, such as PD-L1 expression levels and Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB), have emerged as valuable tools for predicting response to immunotherapy. Integrating biomarker testing into treatment decision-making processes can optimize patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization. However, the cost-effectiveness of incorporating biomarkers into immunotherapy strategies remains a topic of debate. Biomarker-guided immunotherapy represents a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, allowing for personalized therapeutic approaches that maximize efficacy and minimize costs. While the integration of biomarkers poses initial financial challenges, evidence suggests that it can lead to substantial long-term cost savings and improved patient outcomes. Cost-effectiveness analyses play a crucial role in informing healthcare policies and clinical decision-making regarding the adoption of biomarker testing in immunotherapy. Moving forward continued research and investment are essential to realizing the full potential of biomarker-guided approaches in oncology [1].

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment by harnessing the body's immune system to combat tumors. However, not all patients respond equally to immunotherapy, highlighting the need for personalized treatment approaches. Biomarkers, measurable indicators of biological processes, play a crucial role in identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from immunotherapy and optimizing treatment strategies. In this article, we delve into the significance of biomarkers in immunotherapy and how they can be utilized to optimize treatment outcomes. Biomarkers in immunotherapy encompass various molecular, cellular and genetic characteristics that influence treatment response. TMB measures the number of mutations within a tumor's DNA. High TMB is associated with increased production of neoantigens, making the tumor more recognizable to the immune system. Patients with high TMB tend to respond better to immunotherapy, particularly Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a protein expressed on tumor cells that inhibits immune responses. High PD-L1 expression indicates that the tumor may be more susceptible to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. However, PDL1 expression alone is not always predictive of response and its significance varies across different cancer types [2].

Description

MSI is a condition characterized by the accumulation of genetic mutations due to defects in DNA mismatch repair. MSI-high tumors exhibit increased immunogenicity and have shown remarkable responses to immune checkpoint blockade, particularly in colorectal cancer and some types of endometrial cancer. TILs are immune cells that have infiltrated the tumor microenvironment. High levels of TILs indicate a more active immune response against the tumor and are associated with better responses to immunotherapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling can identify specific genetic alterations within tumors, such as mutations in oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, which may influence response to immunotherapy. The integration of biomarkers into clinical practice enables oncologists to tailor immunotherapy regimens to individual patients, maximizing efficacy while minimizing unnecessary toxicity [3].

Biomarker testing helps identify patients who are most likely to benefit from immunotherapy. For example, in non-small cell lung cancer testing for PD-L1 expression guides the use of ICIs as first-line or subsequent therapy. Biomarker profiling can guide the selection of combination therapies that enhance immunotherapy efficacy. For instance, patients with MSI-high tumors may benefit from a combination of ICIs and other immune-modulating agents. Biomarkers can also identify patients who are unlikely to respond to immunotherapy or who may develop resistance over time. This knowledge allows clinicians to explore alternative treatment options or participate in clinical trials investigating novel therapies. Biomarkers can be utilized to monitor treatment response and detect early signs of resistance or disease progression. Regular assessment of biomarker levels during treatment allows for timely adjustments to therapy [4].

Standardized protocols for biomarker testing are needed to ensure consistency and accuracy across different laboratories and institutions. Continued research is necessary to identify and validate new biomarkers that can further improve patient selection and treatment optimization. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy is crucial for developing strategies to overcome treatment resistance and improve longterm outcomes. The cost and accessibility of biomarker testing may limit its widespread adoption, particularly in resource-constrained settings [5].

Conclusion

Biomarkers play a vital role in optimizing immunotherapy outcomes by guiding patient selection, treatment decisions and monitoring response. As our understanding of the complex interplay between the immune system and cancer evolves, the identification and utilization of biomarkers will continue to advance, paving the way for more personalized and effective cancer treatments. Collaborative efforts among researchers, clinicians and stakeholders are essential to address challenges and unlock the full potential of biomarker-guided immunotherapy. In conclusion, the integration of biomarkers into immunotherapy protocols represents a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, offering hope for improved outcomes and better quality of life for patients battling this disease.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Gavrielatou, Niki, Stergios Doumas, Panagiota Economopoulou and Periklis G. Foukas, et al. "Biomarkers for immunotherapy response in head and neck cancer." Cancer TreatRev 84 (2020): 101977.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Verma, Vivek, Tanja Sprave, Waqar Haque and Charles B. Simone, et al. "A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors." J Immunother Cancer 6 (2018): 1-15.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Page, Matthew J., Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt and Isabelle Boutron, et al. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews." BMJ 372 (2021).

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Mucherino, Sara, Valentina Lorenzoni, Valentina Orlando and Isotta Triulzi, et al. "Cost-effectiveness of treatment optimisation with biomarkers for immunotherapy in solid tumours: A systematic review protocol." BMJ open 11, no. 9 (2021): e048141.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Dobosz, Paula and Tomasz Dzieciątkowski. "The intriguing history of cancer immunotherapy." Front Immunol 10 (2019): 496087.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward