The Ease of Doing Business Index: A Catalyst for Global Economic Growth

Xhelil Jóźwik^*
*Correspondence: Xhelil Jóźwik, Department of Economics and Finance, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland, Email:

Introduction

The Ease of Doing Business Index, established by the World Bank, has become one of the most influential tools for assessing the regulatory environments of countries worldwide. It provides a comprehensive evaluation of how easy or difficult it is for businesses to operate, highlighting the bureaucratic, legal, and procedural hurdles that entrepreneurs and investors face in various economies. The index covers ten key areas, ranging from starting a business and obtaining credit to enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. Its insights have proven invaluable for governments, policymakers, and investors alike. This index is far more than just a ranking; it represents a nation’s readiness to attract investment, foster entrepreneurship, and compete on the global economic stage. For businesses, it acts as a guide to understanding the potential challenges and opportunities in different countries. For governments, it is a call to action, motivating reforms to improve their rankings and create a more business-friendly environment. However, while the index has spurred many nations to adopt crucial reforms, it is not without its critics. Some argue that it oversimplifies the complexities of economic ecosystems by focusing narrowly on regulatory aspects and ignoring broader factors like political stability, infrastructure, and labor market dynamics. Nonetheless, its influence on global economic policy and its ability to spotlight areas in need of improvement make it an indispensable tool in today’s interconnected world. This article delves deeper into the significance of the Ease of Doing Business Index, its global impact, and the opportunities and challenges it presents for economies striving to improve their competitiveness [1].

Description

The Ease of Doing Business Index evaluates economies across ten interconnected dimensions that collectively define the regulatory and procedural environment in which businesses operate. These indicators are carefully selected to assess critical aspects of a business’s lifecycle, from its inception to its eventual closure. The elements analyzed include starting a business, dealing with construction permits, obtaining electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts, and resolving insolvency. Each of these metrics serves as a lens through which the challenges and efficiencies of a country’s business environment are examined. For example, the "starting a business" indicator measures the number of steps, costs, and time required to establish a legal entity. Economies like Singapore and New Zealand, which allow businesses to be registered online within a day or two, are seen as models of efficiency. In contrast, countries with cumbersome bureaucratic processes often deter potential entrepreneurs and investors. The simplicity or complexity of starting a business in a country significantly impacts entrepreneurial activity and economic dynamism. Similarly, the "dealing with construction permits" indicator assesses how straightforward it is for businesses to comply with building regulations. In countries with streamlined permit systems, companies can quickly establish physical infrastructure, accelerating business operations [2]. However, in nations with outdated or overly complex construction regulations, delays can lead to increased costs, lost opportunities, and reduced investor confidence.

Obtaining electricity is another critical factor evaluated by the index. Reliable and affordable access to electricity is fundamental for business operations. Countries that simplify the process of acquiring electricity connections, such as through digital applications or reduced administrative requirements, rank higher. For businesses, delays or inefficiencies in obtaining basic utilities can lead to significant financial losses and deter future investments. The "getting credit" indicator plays a pivotal role in the growth of Small And Medium Enterprises (SMEs). In economies with well-developed credit reporting systems and legal frameworks for collateral, businesses have easier access to financing. This access enables them to expand, hire more employees, and innovate. On the other hand, inadequate credit systems or lack of legal protections can stifle entrepreneurial growth and economic inclusivity. One of the most critical indicators is "protecting minority investors." This metric evaluates a country's legal framework for safeguarding the rights of minority shareholders in publicly traded companies. Economies with strong investor protections attract more capital because they instill confidence in both domestic and international investors. Conversely, weak investor protections can lead to disputes, discourage investment, and undermine market efficiency [3].

The ease of "paying taxes" is another influential component of the index. Economies that simplify tax compliance through digital systems and transparent regulations often encourage higher compliance rates and foster trust between businesses and governments. Simplified tax systems not only save time and resources but also create a level playing field for businesses. "Trading across borders" assesses the efficiency of a country’s trade processes, including customs procedures, documentation requirements, and shipping logistics. Countries that minimize the bureaucratic hurdles for imports and exports enable businesses to access international markets more effectively. This efficiency is especially vital for economies reliant on global trade. The "enforcing contracts" indicator evaluates the efficiency of a country’s judicial system in resolving commercial disputes. Quick and fair dispute resolution mechanisms are essential for maintaining trust between businesses and their partners. Economies with well-functioning legal systems tend to attract more investment due to reduced risks. Finally, "resolving insolvency" focuses on how efficiently a country deals with businesses facing financial distress. Economies with robust insolvency frameworks allow businesses to either restructure or exit the market smoothly, preserving economic value and minimizing losses for creditors and employees [4].

The Ease of Doing Business Index has become a key driver of global competitiveness. High-ranking countries, such as Denmark, New Zealand, and South Korea, serve as benchmarks, inspiring other nations to adopt best practices. These leading economies demonstrate that simplified regulations, strong legal protections, and transparent processes not only attract Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) but also foster domestic entrepreneurship and innovation. Developing countries, in particular, have used the index as a guide for reform. For instance, Rwanda has implemented over 50 regulatory reforms in the past two decades, improving its business environment and climbing significantly in the rankings. These changes have transformed Rwanda into a model for other African nations, showcasing how targeted reforms can drive economic growth and diversification. Despite its widespread adoption, the Ease of Doing Business Index is not without its limitations. Critics argue that the index places too much emphasis on regulatory efficiency while neglecting broader socio-economic factors such as labor market conditions, infrastructure quality, corruption levels, and political stability. For example, a country may score well on the index for its ease of starting a business but may lack the infrastructure or workforce skills needed for businesses to thrive.

Furthermore, the index’s uniform methodology does not account for the unique economic and cultural contexts of different countries. Policies that improve rankings may not always align with a country’s long-term development goals. In some cases, governments may focus excessively on improving specific indicators to climb the rankings, neglecting more pressing local challenges such as poverty alleviation, income inequality, or environmental sustainability. However, the index also offers significant opportunities for improvement. By incorporating additional metrics, such as digital transformation, environmental sustainability, and workforce inclusivity, the index could provide a more holistic assessment of business environments. These enhancements would ensure that the index remains relevant in a rapidly evolving global economy. In addition, the index could expand its focus to include regional disparities within countries. Many large economies exhibit significant variations in ease of doing business across different states or provinces. Addressing these intra-country disparities would provide a more accurate and actionable picture of the business landscape [5].

Conclusion

The Ease of Doing Business Index is a testament to the power of datadriven insights in shaping global economic policy. By providing a transparent and measurable framework for evaluating business environments, it has spurred significant reforms, enhanced global competitiveness, and attracted investments to countries that have embraced its principles. Nations that perform well on the index often become hubs for innovation, economic growth, and job creation, highlighting its role as a catalyst for progress. However, the journey toward creating truly business-friendly environments requires addressing the index’s limitations and adopting a more holistic approach. By expanding its scope to include factors like digital transformation, social equity, and environmental sustainability, the index can better reflect the complexities of modern economies. Governments must also ensure that reforms driven by rankings align with their broader development goals, creating a balance between short-term improvements and long-term resilience. In conclusion, the Ease of Doing Business Index is more than a ranking system; it is a tool for empowering governments, guiding investors, and inspiring entrepreneurs. As the global economy continues to transform, leveraging the index’s insights while evolving its framework will be critical to building inclusive, dynamic, and sustainable business ecosystems. By embracing the challenges and opportunities it presents, nations can unlock their potential and foster a brighter economic future for all.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Barba-Sánchez, Virginia, Luis Orozco-Barbosa and Enrique Arias-Antúnez. "On the impact of information technologies secondary-school capacity in business development: Evidence From smart cities Around the world." Front Psychol 12 (2021): 731443.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Zou, Xiaolong, Shihan Ma and Sihan Xin. "An Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach for Smart City Assessment in Japan: From Concept to Indicators." Int Rev Spat Plan Sustain Dev 10 2022): 58-72.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Jayathilaka, Ruwan, Chanuka Jayawardhana, Nilupul Embogama and Shalini Jayasooriya, et al. "Gross domestic product and logistics performance index drive the world trade: A study based on all continents." PloS one 17 (2022): e0264474.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Merk, Olaf and Thai-Thanh Dang. "Efficiency of world ports in container and bulk cargo (oil, coal, ores and grain)." (2012).

Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Wang, Lei, Chun Zhang and Fuming Jiang. "Matching governance mechanisms with transaction-specific investment types and supplier roles: An empirical study of cross-border outsourcing relationships." Int Bus Rev 28 (2019): 316-327.

Google Scholar, Crossref