GET THE APP

The Effect of Intraoperative Lung Protective Strategies on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
..

Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology: Open Access

ISSN: 2684-6004

Open Access

Short Communication - (2023) Volume 7, Issue 2

The Effect of Intraoperative Lung Protective Strategies on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Daniel Nicholas*
*Correspondence: Daniel Nicholas, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, 116 St & 85 Ave, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada, Email:
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, 116 St & 85 Ave, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada

Received: 17-Mar-2023, Manuscript No. jcao-23-99569; Editor assigned: 20-Mar-2023, Pre QC No. P-99569; Reviewed: 03-Apr-2023, QC No. Q-99569; Revised: 08-Apr-2023, Manuscript No. R-99569; Published: 17-Apr-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2684-6004.2023.7.163
Citation: Nicholas, Daniel. “The Effect of Intraoperative Lung Protective Strategies on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” J Clin Anesthesiol 7 (2023): 163.
Copyright: © 2023 Nicholas D. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following thoracic surgery. In recent years, there has been growing interest in implementing intraoperative lung protective strategies to minimize the risk of PPCs. This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effect of these strategies on postoperative outcomes in thoracic surgery patients. Thoracic surgery, involving procedures on the lungs, thoracic wall, and mediastinum, is a vital branch of surgical medicine. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs) remain a significant concern, contributing to increased morbidity, mortality, healthcare costs, and prolonged hospital stays. PPCs encompass a wide range of complications, including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and atelectasis, which can lead to substantial patient discomfort and impaired recovery.

Thoracic surgery encompasses various procedures involving the lungs, thoracic wall, and mediastinum. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, PPCs remain a significant concern, contributing to prolonged hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and patient discomfort. Intraoperative lung protective strategies have emerged as a potential approach to reduce the incidence of PPCs and improve postoperative outcomes. In recent years, there has been growing interest in implementing intraoperative lung protective strategies to mitigate the risk of PPCs in thoracic surgery patients [1-3]. These strategies aim to minimize the injurious effects of mechanical ventilation on lung tissue, reducing the risk of Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury (VILI) and subsequent complications.

Description

A randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling patients scheduled for thoracic surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either standard intraoperative ventilation or an enhanced lung protective ventilation strategy. The enhanced strategy included low tidal volume ventilation, Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) optimization, recruitment maneuvers, and individualized FiO2 titration. Primary outcomes included the incidence of PPCs within 30 days post-surgery, including pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), and atelectasis. Secondary outcomes comprised the length of hospital stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission rate, and 30-day mortality.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the incidence of PPCs within 30 days post-surgery, including pneumonia, ARDS, and atelectasis, in patients receiving an enhanced lung protective ventilation strategy compared to those receiving standard intraoperative ventilation. Secondary objectives include evaluating the length of hospital stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission rate, and 30-day mortality. However, the specific impact of these strategies in thoracic surgery patients, with their unique physiological considerations and higher susceptibility to lung injury, remains an area of ongoing investigation [4,5]. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of intraoperative lung protective strategies on postoperative outcomes in thoracic surgery patients.

A total of 200 patients were included in the study, with 100 patients allocated to each group. The group receiving the enhanced lung protective ventilation strategy demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of PPCs compared to the standard ventilation group (p<0.05). Specifically, the rates of postoperative pneumonia, ARDS, and atelectasis were significantly lower in the intervention group. Furthermore, patients in the enhanced ventilation group had shorter hospital stays, lower ICU admission rates, and a decreased 30-day mortality rate compared to the control group.

Conclusion

Intraoperative lung protective strategies, encompassing low tidal volume ventilation, PEEP optimization, recruitment maneuvers, and individualized FiO2 titration, significantly reduce the incidence of PPCs in thoracic surgery patients. Moreover, these strategies are associated with improved postoperative outcomes, including shorter hospital stays, reduced ICU admissions, and lower 30-day mortality rates. The implementation of such strategies should be considered in routine clinical practice to enhance patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs associated with PPCs in thoracic surgery patients. Further studies are warranted to explore the long-term effects of these interventions and their applicability in various surgical populations.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

  1. Batchelor, Timothy JP, Neil J. Rasburn, Etienne Abdelnour-Berchtold and Alessandro Brunelli, et al. "Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: Recommendations of the enhanced recovery after surgery (eras®) society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)." Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 55 (2019): 91-115.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Senturk, James C., Gentian Kristo, Jason Gold and Ronald Bleday, et al. "The development of enhanced recovery after surgery across surgical specialties." J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 27 (2017): 863-870.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Rogers, Luke J., David Bleetman, David E. Messenger and Natasha A. Joshi, et al. "The impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer." J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155 (2018): 1843-1852.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Oxman, David A., Nicolas C. Issa, Francisco M. Marty and Alka Patel, et al. "Postoperative antibacterial prophylaxis for the prevention of infectious complications associated with tube thoracostomy in patients undergoing elective general thoracic surgery: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial." JAMA Surg 148 (2013): 440-446.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Stock, M. Christine, John B. Downs, Paul K. Gauer and Joan M. Alster, et al. "Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications with CPAP, incentive spirometry, and conservative therapy." Chest 87 (1985): 151-157.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward