The Emergency Within: Aortic Dissection Demystified

Ribeiro Eugenia^*
*Correspondence: Ribeiro Eugenia, Department of Vascular Surgery, Aix Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France, Email:

Keywords

Aortic dissection • Emergency medicine • Cardiovascular disease • Thoracic aorta

Introduction

Aortic dissection represents a medical emergency with a mortality rate approaching 1-2% per hour during the initial 24 to 48 hours post-onset if left untreated. It involves a tear in the inner layer of the aorta, allowing blood to flow into the aortic wall, creating a false lumen. This condition requires prompt recognition and intervention to mitigate the risk of complications such as organ malperfusion, rupture, and death [1]. Aortic dissection commonly occurs in individuals with underlying connective tissue disorders such as Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. However, it can also be associated with hypertension, atherosclerosis, bicuspid aortic valve, and previous aortic surgery. The mechanical stress on the aortic wall due to these factors predisposes it to tear, initiating the cascade of events leading to dissection [2].

Literature Review

The clinical presentation of aortic dissection varies widely, often mimicking other cardiovascular emergencies, making its diagnosis challenging. Patients may describe sudden, severe, ripping or tearing chest pain radiating to the back or abdomen. However, some individuals may present with atypical symptoms such as syncope, stroke, abdominal pain, or limb ischemia. The absence of classic symptoms necessitates a high index of suspicion, especially in high-risk populations. Prompt diagnosis of aortic dissection is imperative for initiating appropriate management. Transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography are valuable tools for initial assessment, providing real-time visualization of the aortic anatomy. Computed tomography angiography remains the gold standard for confirming the diagnosis, offering high sensitivity and specificity. Magnetic resonance imaging may be utilized in cases where CTA is contraindicated or inconclusive. The management of aortic dissection depends on the acuity, extent, and complications of the dissection. In the acute setting, the primary goal is to stabilize the patient's condition and reduce aortic wall stress to prevent further dissection or rupture. This typically involves aggressive blood pressure control with beta-blockers and, in some cases, vasodilators. Surgical intervention, either through open repair or endovascular techniques, is often necessary for Stanford type A dissections involving the ascending aorta or complicated type B dissections.

Aortic dissection represents a critical cardiovascular emergency with potentially devastating consequences if not promptly recognized and managed. By understanding its etiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options, healthcare professionals can expedite diagnosis and optimize patient outcomes. Heightened awareness, early intervention, and multidisciplinary collaboration are paramount in navigating this complex condition and saving lives. In cases where surgical intervention is indicated, the approach depends on the extent and location of the dissection. Stanford type A dissections, involving the ascending aorta, typically require emergent surgical repair. This often involves replacing the affected segment of the aorta with a synthetic graft, performed via a median sternotomy. In contrast, Stanford type B dissections, which do not involve the ascending aorta, are initially managed medically with blood pressure control. However, if complications arise, such as malperfusion of vital organs or aneurysmal dilation, endovascular stent grafting may be considered to seal the false lumen and restore aortic integrity [3].

Discussion

Following the acute phase of aortic dissection, long-term management focuses on preventing recurrent dissection and minimizing the risk of complications. This includes aggressive blood pressure control with antihypertensive medications, often targeting lower blood pressure goals than typical guidelines to reduce aortic wall stress. Regular surveillance imaging, such as CT or MRI angiography, is essential to monitor for any changes in aortic morphology, aneurysmal dilation, or new dissection flaps. Lifestyle modifications, including smoking cessation and regular exercise, are also encouraged to mitigate cardiovascular risk factors. The prognosis of aortic dissection is influenced by various factors, including the extent of the dissection, the presence of complications, and the timeliness of intervention. Mortality rates remain high, particularly in cases of Stanford type A dissections, despite advances in surgical techniques and critical care management. Even with successful surgical repair, patients with aortic dissection require lifelong surveillance and management to prevent recurrent events and associated complications [4-6].

Conclusion

Aortic dissection represents a formidable challenge in cardiovascular medicine, requiring rapid recognition, accurate diagnosis, and decisive intervention to optimize outcomes. By maintaining a high index of suspicion, employing appropriate diagnostic modalities, and implementing multidisciplinary treatment strategies, healthcare providers can effectively navigate this complex condition. Continued research into the pathophysiology of aortic dissection and advancements in treatment modalities hold promise for improving prognosis and quality of life for affected individuals. Ultimately, a comprehensive approach encompassing acute stabilization, long-term management, and patient education is essential in combating the silent threat of aortic dissection.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Johnson, Cali E., Louis Zhang, Gregory A. Magee and Sung W. Ham, et al. “Periscope sandwich stenting as an alternative to open cervical revascularization of left subclavian artery during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair.”J Vasc Surg73 (2021): 466-475.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Mei, Fei, Mingkui Huang, Kewei Wang and Jianfeng Sun, et al. “Physician-modified endograft with left subclavian artery fenestration for ruptured type B aortic dissection.”Ann Vasc Surg77 (2021): 352-e7.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Redlinger Jr, Richard E., Sadaf S. Ahanchi and Jean M. Panneton. “In situ laser fenestration during emergent thoracic endovascular aortic repair is an effective method for left subclavian artery revascularization.”J Vasc Surg58 (2013): 1171-1177.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Gallitto, Enrico, Gian Luca Faggioli, Federica Campana and Francesca Maria Feroldi, et al. “Type II endoleaks after fenestrated/branched endografting for juxtarenal and pararenal aortic aneurysms.”J Vasc Surg(2024).

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Li, Hai-Lei, Yiu Che Chan, He-Yue Jia and Stephan W. Cheng. “Methods and outcomes of endovascular false lumen embolization for thoracic aortic dissection.”Ann Vasc Surg85 (2022): 371-382.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Kanaoka, Yuji, Takao Ohki and Hirotsugu Ozawa. “Repair of chronic aneurysmal aortic dissection using a stent graft and an Amplatzer® vascular plug: A case study.”Ann Vasc Surg39 (2017): 288-e5.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at