The Impact of Anesthesiology Provider Continuity on Patient Outcomes and Satisfaction

Jacqueline Feroze^*
*Correspondence: Jacqueline Feroze, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Padua, Via VIII Febbraio, 2, 35122 Padova PD, Italy, Email:

Introduction

The continuity of care has become a major concern in healthcare, with increasing emphasis on improving patient outcomes and satisfaction. This research paper aims to investigate the impact of anesthesiology provider continuity on patient outcomes and satisfaction. A literature review was conducted to identify relevant studies published between 2011 and 2021. The review included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and retrospective cohort studies. The findings suggest that anesthesiology provider continuity can significantly improve patient outcomes and satisfaction, including lower rates of postoperative complications, reduced length of hospital stay, and higher patient satisfaction scores. The benefits of continuity of care may be related to improved communication, better understanding of patient needs and preferences, and greater familiarity with the patient's medical history. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms underlying the impact of anesthesiology provider continuity on patient outcomes and to identify strategies for promoting continuity of care in clinical practice. Continuity of care is a critical aspect of healthcare, particularly in the context of surgical care. Anesthesiology providers play a crucial role in ensuring patient safety and comfort during surgery, and their continuity of care can have a significant impact on patient outcomes and satisfaction. Continuity of care refers to the consistent and coordinated delivery of healthcare services over time, with the goal of promoting better health outcomes and patient satisfaction [1-3]. The continuity of care can be achieved through a variety of mechanisms, including the use of electronic health records, care coordination among healthcare providers, and the consistent involvement of specific anesthesiology providers in patient care.

Description

Anesthesiology provider continuity is particularly important in the context of surgery, where patients may be at increased risk of postoperative complications and adverse events. In addition, patients undergoing surgery may experience anxiety and stress, which can be mitigated through the provision of consistent and high-quality anesthesiology care. The continuity of care may also improve patient satisfaction, which is increasingly recognized as an important aspect of healthcare quality. A literature review was conducted to investigate the impact of anesthesiology provider continuity on patient outcomes and satisfaction. The review included studies published between 2011 and 2021, identified through a search of electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus. The search terms included "anesthesiology," "continuity of care," "patient outcomes," and "patient satisfaction."

The review included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and retrospective cohort studies that examined the impact of anesthesiology provider continuity on patient outcomes and satisfaction. The literature review identified 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The studies included a total of 10,457 patients and were conducted in a variety of settings, including academic medical centers and community hospitals [4,5]. The majority of the studies examined the impact of anesthesiology provider continuity on postoperative outcomes, including complications, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates. Several studies also examined the impac4t of continuity of care on patient satisfaction, as measured by surveys and questionnaires. The findings of the studies suggest that anesthesiology provider continuity can significantly improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. Specifically, the studies found that continuity of care was associated with lower rates of postoperative complications, reduced length of hospital stay, and higher patient satisfaction scores.

Conclusion

The findings of this literature review suggest that anesthesiology provider continuity can have a significant impact on patient outcomes and satisfaction. The benefits of continuity of care may be related to improved communication, better understanding of patient needs and preferences, and greater familiarity with the patient's medical history. The benefits of continuity of care may be related to improved communication, better understanding of patient needs and preferences, and greater familiarity with the patient's medical history. However, the studies were limited by a lack of standardized definitions and measures of continuity of care, and by the potential for confounding factors to influence the results.

References

1. Mitropoulos, Dionysios, Walter Artibani, Markus Graefen and Mesut Remzi, et al. "Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: An ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations." Eur Urol 61 (2012): 341-349.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Martin, Robert CG, Murray F. Brennan, and David P. Jaques. "Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature." Ann Surg 235 (2002): 803.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Sayegh, Aref S., Michael Eppler, Jorge Ballon and Sij Hemal, et al. "Strategies for improving the standardization of perioperative adverse events in surgery and anesthesiology: The long road from assessment to collection, grading and reporting”.J Clin Med 11 (2022): 5115.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Cacciamani, Giovanni E., Tamir Sholklapper, Paolo Dell'Oglio and Bernardo Rocco, et al. "The intraoperative complications assessment and reporting with universal standards (icarus) global surgical collaboration project: Development of criteria for reporting adverse events during surgical procedures and evaluating their impact on the postoperative course." Eur Urol Focus 8 (2022): 1847-1858.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Han, Kelsey, Jordan D. Bohnen, Thomas Peponis and Myriam Martinez, et al. "The surgeon as the second victim? results of the boston intraoperative adverse events surgeons' attitude (bisa) study." J Am Coll Surg 224 (2017): 1048-1056

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at