GET THE APP

The Impact of General Practice Nursing Care in Patients
..

Journal of General Practice

ISSN: 2329-9126

Open Access

Brief Report - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 1

The Impact of General Practice Nursing Care in Patients

Annette Robyn*
*Correspondence: Annette Robyn, Primary Health Care Centre, Barcelona, Spain, Email:
Primary Health Care Centre, Barcelona, Spain

Received: 04-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. JGPR-22-54617; Editor assigned: 06-Jan-2022, Pre QC No. P-54617; Reviewed: 17-Jan-2022, QC No. Q-54617; Revised: 22-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. R-54617; Published: 29-Jan-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2329-9126.22.10.434
Citation: Robyn, Annette. “The Impact of General Practice Nursing Care in Patients.” J Gen Prac 10 (2022): 434. DOI: 10.37421/2329-9126.22.10.434
Copyright: © 2022 Robyn A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Brief Report

Usual procedure Women's health, men's health, aged care, infection control, chronic disease management including cardiovascular, asthma, and diabetes care, immunisation, cancer management, mental health, maternal and child health, health promotion, population health, wound management, illness prevention, and much more are all areas of nursing practise. In addition to providing traditional aspects of nursing care such as wound care, immunisations, vaccinations, Cervical cytology sampling, and holding clinics for patients with Long Term Conditions such as asthma, heart disease, and diabetes, they assess, screen, and treat people of all ages, including babies, children, and adults.

Despite efforts to attain conceptual clarity, advanced practise nursing remains a liminal realm, unable to maintain its status as a sustainable mode of healthcare delivery. This is especially true in general practise, where advanced practise role development is more fluid and less supported by the hospital system's hierarchical structures. The unique perspective provided by patients, nurses, and doctors in this new setting sheds new light on why advanced practise nurses have struggled to acquire acceptability in the hospital environment. Nurses conduct advanced practise activities such as diabetes teaching, chronic disease management, and mental health casework in general practise, replacing work previously performed by a general practitioner. In terms of comprehensive care, systems support, education, research, and professional leadership, it is generally acknowledged that this range of tasks satisfies worldwide expectations of advanced practise nursing.

Patients' experience of care, in terms of health services accessibility, is improved when registered nurses take on a role in routinely tracking patients with recurrent health needs, such as those with chronic illnesses. The demand on primary care is increasing as the prevalence of chronic illnesses rises and the population ages. Involving registered nurses in primary care and maximising their scope of practise is a strategy that should be promoted in order to improve patient care and health-care system efficiency.

Nurses are more frequently depicted in the media in hospital settings than in GP offices, where it is much easier to illustrate nursing activities than in a general practise context. Dressings and injections are more commonly associated with general practise nursing than health education, managing long-term diseases, prescribing, or practising as an Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP). As a result, the potential for a truly meaningful career in general practise is rarely recognised. Rather than recognising and promoting the significance of a career in general practise nursing, university programmes typically focus on hospital nursing. By providing substantive placements, the advanced training practises programme in Yorkshire is transforming student impressions of general practise, increasing the likelihood that an individual will choose general practise as a first-destination career.

Person-centered Care (PCC) is the gold standard in long-term care, according to decades of practise and study. Rather than having organisational or staffing needs drive care decisions, these techniques stress putting the person at the centre of planning and care. PCC necessitates nursing staff and others getting to know a person well and recognising and respecting their personality, or uniqueness and value. PCC also emphasises personalising care to fit individual preferences, needs, and values, as well as promoting autonomy, including the capacity to engage in activities that are significant to the person [1-5].

References

  1. Kackin, Ozlem, Emre Ciydem, Ozgur Sema Aci and Fatma Yasemin Kutlu. "Experiences and psychosocial problems of nurses caring for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Turkey: A qualitative study."Int J Social Psychiatr67 (2021): 158-167.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Salisbury, Chris, Mairead Murphy and Polly Duncan. "The impact of digital-first consultations on workload in general practice: Modeling study."J Med Internet Res22 (2020): e18203.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Danhieux, Katrien, Veerle Buffel, Anthony Pairon and Asma Benkheil, et al. "The impact of COVID-19 on chronic care according to providers: a qualitative study among primary care practices in Belgium."BMC Family Prac21 (2020): 1-6.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Yin, Xue and Lingdan Zeng. "A study on the psychological needs of nurses caring for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 from the perspective of the existence, relatedness, and growth theory."Int J Nursing Sci7 (2020): 157-160.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Murphy, Mairead, Lauren J Scott, Chris Salisbury and Andrew Turner, et al. "Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods longitudinal study."British J Gen Prac71 (2021): e166-e177.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 952

Journal of General Practice received 952 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of General Practice peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward