The Influence of Medical Jurisprudence on Healthcare Policy and Legislation

Mauro Berto^*
*Correspondence: Mauro Berto, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli, Italy, Email:

Keywords

Medical jurisprudence • Healthcare policy • Legislation • Legal principles • Patient rights • Medical ethics

Introduction

Medical jurisprudence, often referred to as forensic medicine, encompasses the legal aspects of healthcare, providing a framework for addressing complex issues at the intersection of medicine and law. This field has far-reaching implications for the development and implementation of healthcare policy and legislation. The intricate relationship between medical practitioners and legal professionals has given rise to a dynamic interplay that shapes the landscape of modern healthcare. Medical jurisprudence introduces legal principles that govern the practice of medicine, ensuring that healthcare professionals adhere to established norms and standards. These principles include informed consent, confidentiality and the duty of care. Informed consent, for example, requires healthcare providers to obtain explicit permission from patients before administering treatments or procedures, thereby safeguarding patient autonomy.

The legal framework provided by medical jurisprudence establishes a foundation for ethical medical practices, directly influencing healthcare policies that seek to protect the rights and well-being of patients. Landmark legal cases often set precedents that influence healthcare policy and legislation. For instance, cases related to medical malpractice, patient confidentiality and reproductive rights have shaped the legal landscape surrounding healthcare. The outcomes of these cases establish guidelines and standards that lawmakers consider when crafting policies to address emerging issues in the healthcare sector. By analyzing these cases, policymakers can better understand the complexities of medical practice and tailor legislation to address evolving challenges [1].

Literature Review

Medical jurisprudence plays a crucial role in defining and safeguarding patient rights. The right to privacy, confidentiality and access to quality healthcare are among the fundamental principles that emerge from the intersection of medicine and law. As healthcare policies evolve, they must strike a balance between protecting patient rights and promoting public health. Medical jurisprudence provides the legal framework for addressing these ethical considerations and ensuring that healthcare policies align with the principles of justice and fairness. The integration of medical jurisprudence into healthcare policy highlights the need for an interdisciplinary approach. Legal professionals, healthcare practitioners and policymakers must collaborate to create effective and equitable healthcare regulations. By fostering dialogue between these disciplines, policymakers can develop nuanced policies that address the complexities of modern medicine while upholding legal standards [2,3].

The influence of medical jurisprudence on healthcare policy and legislation is undeniable. This interdisciplinary field provides a crucial framework for addressing legal and ethical challenges in medicine, shaping the development of policies that govern healthcare practices. As medical technology advances and new ethical dilemmas emerge, the collaboration between medicine and the law will continue to play a pivotal role in ensuring the delivery of highquality, ethical and patient-centered healthcare. While the influence of medical jurisprudence on healthcare policy has been substantial, there are ongoing challenges and areas for further exploration. As medical science and technology continue to advance, policymakers must grapple with emerging issues such as genetic testing, telemedicine and artificial intelligence in healthcare. These developments pose unique legal and ethical challenges that necessitate careful consideration within the framework of medical jurisprudence [4].

Discussion

The rapid advancement of genetic testing technologies raises questions about the ownership and protection of genetic information. Medical jurisprudence must adapt to address issues related to genetic privacy, discrimination and the responsible use of genetic data in healthcare decisionmaking. The widespread adoption of telemedicine introduces challenges related to jurisdiction and licensing. As patients can receive medical services across state or national borders, medical jurisprudence needs to provide clear guidelines on licensure, liability and the standard of care in the context of virtual healthcare delivery [5].

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical diagnosis and treatment planning raises complex legal and ethical questions. Medical jurisprudence must evolve to establish liability frameworks, accountability standards and guidelines for the ethical use of AI in healthcare, ensuring patient safety and maintaining the human-centric approach to medical decision-making. The increasing interconnectedness of the global community amplifies the need for international collaboration in healthcare policy. Medical jurisprudence can contribute to the development of frameworks that facilitate cooperation in addressing global health challenges, including pandemics, infectious diseases and the equitable distribution of medical resources [6].

Conclusion

The empowerment of patients through advocacy and informed consent is an ongoing focus of medical jurisprudence. Policymakers must continue to refine regulations to strengthen patient rights, foster transparency and ensure that individuals are actively involved in decisions regarding their healthcare. As medical jurisprudence continues to evolve alongside advancements in medicine and technology, its impact on healthcare policy and legislation will remain significant. The ongoing collaboration between legal and medical professionals is essential for addressing emerging challenges, safeguarding patient rights and ensuring that healthcare policies align with ethical principles. By fostering an interdisciplinary approach, policymakers can navigate the complexities of the modern healthcare landscape and develop regulations that promote the highest standards of care, accountability and justice. The synergy between medical jurisprudence and healthcare policy is a dynamic force that will shape the future of medicine and law, ultimately contributing to the wellbeing of individuals and the advancement of public health.

Acknowledgement

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

1. Ferorelli, D., L. Nardelli, L. Spagnolo and S. Corradi, et al. "Medical legal aspects of telemedicine in Italy: Application fields, professional liability and focus on care services during the COVID-19 health emergency." J Prim Care Community Health 11 (2020): 2150132720985055.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Baldoni, Simone, Francesco Amenta and Giovanna Ricci. "Telepharmacy services: Present status and future perspectives: A review." Medicina 55 (2019): 327.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Tarantino, Umberto, Alessio Giai Via, Ernesto Macri and Alessandro Eramo, et al. "Professional liability in orthopaedics and traumatology in Italy." Clin Orthop 471 (2013): 3349-3357.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Bolcato, Matteo, Daniele Rodriguez and Anna Aprile. "Risk management in the new frontier of professional liability for nosocomial infection: Review of the literature on M. chimaera." Int J Environ Res Public Health 17 (2020): 7328.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Vila-Nova da Silva, Dione Batista, Fábio Xerfan Nahas, Rodolpho Alberto Bussolaro and Maria José Azevedo de Brito, et al. "The increasing growth of plastic surgery lawsuits in Brazil." Aesthet Plast Surg 34 (2010): 541-542.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Boyll, Piper, Paul Kang, Raman Mahabir and Robert W. Bernard. "Variables that impact medical malpractice claims involving plastic surgeons in the United States." Aesthet Surg J 38 (2018): 785-792.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at