The Moderating Effect of Stakeholder Participation in Decision-making on Risk Management and Financial Stability in Polish Public Hospitals

Sofia Costa^*
*Correspondence: Sofia Costa, Department of Commerce, University of Helsinki, 00170 Helsinki, Finland, Email:

Keywords

Stakeholder participation • Decision-making • Risk management

Introduction

In recent years, the healthcare sector has undergone significant transformations globally, driven by evolving patient needs, technological advancements, and regulatory changes. Amidst these shifts, stakeholders in healthcare organizations play a crucial role in shaping strategic decisions, particularly concerning risk management and financial stability. This article focuses on the context of Polish public hospitals, where stakeholder participation in decision-making processes can influence the effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies and financial performance. Stakeholder theory posits that organizations should consider the interests of various stakeholders, including patients, employees, government entities, and communities, in their decision-making processes. In healthcare management, stakeholders exert influence on organizational policies, resource allocation, and strategic planning. Studies have shown that hospitals with active stakeholder engagement tend to achieve better outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction, employee retention, and financial performance. However, the extent to which stakeholders participate in decision-making varies across healthcare systems and organizational structures [1].

Literature Review

Healthcare organizations face a myriad of risks, including clinical, operational, financial, and reputational risks. Effective risk management involves identifying potential threats, assessing their likelihood and impact, implementing control measures, and monitoring outcomes. In the context of Polish public hospitals, risk management practices are influenced by regulatory requirements, budget constraints, and the complexity of healthcare delivery. Stakeholder involvement in risk management processes can enhance risk identification, promote transparency, and foster a culture of accountability [2]. Financial stability is essential for the sustainability of public hospitals, ensuring continuity of care and investment in quality improvement initiatives. However, public hospitals often operate within constrained budgets, facing challenges such as inadequate funding, rising costs, and reimbursement uncertainties. Stakeholders, including government agencies, payers, healthcare professionals, and patients, have vested interests in the financial performance of public hospitals. Collaborative decision-making can facilitate resource allocation, revenue diversification, and cost containment strategies, thereby enhancing financial stability.

The relationship between stakeholder participation, risk management, and financial stability in Polish public hospitals is complex and multifaceted. Stakeholders contribute diverse perspectives, expertise, and resources to decision-making processes, which can mitigate risks and capitalize on opportunities. However, the effectiveness of stakeholder participation depends on several factors, including organizational culture, leadership dynamics, and communication channels. High levels of stakeholder engagement may lead to consensus-driven decision-making but could also prolong decision cycles and impede agility [3].

Discussion

Hospitals should foster a culture of inclusivity, where stakeholders feel empowered to contribute their insights and perspectives. This may involve establishing advisory boards, conducting regular forums for dialogue, and leveraging technology for virtual collaboration. Risk management should be embedded within the governance framework of public hospitals, with clear accountability structures and reporting mechanisms. Engaging stakeholders in risk assessment, mitigation planning, and performance monitoring can enhance organizational resilience [4]. Financial decisions should reflect the priorities and values of stakeholders, balancing short-term financial objectives with long-term sustainability goals. Transparent communication about financial performance, budgetary constraints, and investment priorities is essential for building trust and credibility. Hospital leaders must demonstrate adaptability, resilience, and vision in navigating complex and uncertain environments. This requires fostering collaboration, facilitating consensus-building, and embracing innovation to address emerging challenges and opportunities. Decisionmaking processes should be subject to regular evaluation and feedback loops to identify areas for improvement. Hospitals should embrace a culture of learning, experimentation, and adaptation to refine their decision-making practices over time [5].

Polish public hospitals often operate within limited financial resources, which can hinder their ability to invest in stakeholder engagement initiatives. Budgetary constraints may limit the availability of resources for training, technology infrastructure, and stakeholder outreach activities. Traditional hierarchical structures within public hospitals may impede effective stakeholder participation, as decision-making power tends to be concentrated at the top. Breaking down silos and fostering a culture of collaboration across departments and levels of hierarchy is essential for meaningful engagement. Stakeholder participation initiatives may face resistance from entrenched interests or individuals who perceive their influence or authority to be threatened. Overcoming resistance to change requires proactive communication, transparency, and education about the benefits of inclusive decision-making [6].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the moderating effect of stakeholder participation in decision-making is pivotal for enhancing risk management and financial stability in Polish public hospitals. By engaging stakeholders effectively, hospitals can harness collective intelligence, promote accountability, and drive sustainable performance. However, achieving meaningful stakeholder engagement requires deliberate efforts to overcome barriers and foster a culture of collaboration. Moving forward, Polish public hospitals must prioritize inclusive decision-making processes to navigate the complexities of the healthcare landscape and ensure their long-term viability. Despite the challenges involved, hospitals have a unique opportunity to leverage stakeholder insights, expertise, and resources to drive meaningful change and achieve sustainable outcomes. By embracing inclusive practices, fostering collaboration, and embracing technological innovations, public hospitals can navigate the complexities of the healthcare landscape and deliver value for all stakeholders.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Beierle, Thomas C. "The quality of stakeholder‐based decisions." Risk Anal:  Int J 22 (2002): 739-749.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Burchett, Danielle and Yossef S. Ben-Porath. "Methodological considerations for developing and evaluating response bias indicators." Psychol Assess 31 (2019): 1497.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Griffith, John R. "Championship management for healthcare organizations." J Healthc Manag 45 (2000): 17-30.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. McCue, Michael J. and R. Forrest McCluer. "Financial and Operational Ratios for Bond-Insured Hospitals." Hospital Topics 86 (2008): 3-8.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Norris, Jill M., Deborah E. White, Lorelli Nowell and Kelly Mrklas, et al. "How do stakeholders from multiple hierarchical levels of a large provincial health system define engagement? A qualitative study." Implement Sci 12 (2017): 1-13.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Sheppard, Faye, Marcie Williams and Victor R. Klein. "TeamSTEPPS and patient safety in healthcare." J  Healthc Risk Manag 32 (2013): 5-10.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at