The Pros and Cons of Cosmetic Gynecology: Overview of Procedures and Controversies

Stéphane Vignes^*
*Correspondence: Stéphane Vignes, Department of Lymphology, Cognacq-Jay Hospital, 75015 Paris, France, Email:

Keywords

Cosmesis • Laparoscopy • Myomectomy

Introduction

One of the most common cosmetic gynecology procedures is labiaplasty. Labiaplasty is a surgical procedure that involves the reduction or reshaping of the labia minora, which are the inner lips of the vulva. Women may choose to undergo labiaplasty for a number of reasons, including discomfort during intercourse or physical activities, irritation from clothing, or dissatisfaction with the appearance of their labia [1].

Literature Review

Another common procedure is vaginoplasty, which is a surgical procedure that tightens the vaginal canal. This procedure can be done for both functional and cosmetic reasons, as it can improve sexual function and sensation as well as improve the appearance of the genital area. Clitoral hood reduction is another procedure that falls under the umbrella of cosmetic gynecology. This procedure involves the removal of excess tissue from the clitoral hood, which can improve the appearance and function of the clitoris. Women may choose to undergo clitoral hood reduction for cosmetic reasons, but it can also improve sexual function by increasing clitoral sensitivity.

Discussion

There are also non-surgical procedures available, such as labia puffing and laser vaginal rejuvenation. Labia puffing involves injecting hyaluronic acid into the labia majora to increase their size and fullness, while laser vaginal rejuvenation uses laser technology to stimulate collagen production in the vaginal walls, which can improve vaginal tone and elasticity [2,3]. While cosmetic gynecology procedures have become increasingly popular, they are not without controversy. Some critics argue that these procedures are unnecessary and reinforce unrealistic beauty standards for women. Others argue that these procedures can have serious physical and psychological consequences, and that women should be encouraged to accept and embrace their bodies as they are [4].

However, proponents of cosmetic gynecology argue that these procedures can have a significant positive impact on women's lives. For some women, cosmetic gynecology procedures can alleviate physical discomfort and improve sexual function. For others, these procedures can boost self-confidence and improve body image. It is important for women to carefully consider their motivations for undergoing cosmetic gynecology procedures and to choose a qualified and experienced provider. Women should also be aware of the potential risks and complications associated with these procedures, and should have realistic expectations for their outcomes [5,6].

Conclusion

Overall, cosmetic gynecology is a rapidly growing field that offers a range of procedures to improve the aesthetics and function of the female genitalia. While these procedures are not without controversy, they have the potential to positively impact women's lives and should be approached with care and consideration.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

References

1. Zampell, Jamie C., Seth Aschen, Evan S. Weitman and Alan Yan, et al. "Regulation of adipogenesis by lymphatic fluid stasis: part I. Adipogenesis, fibrosis, and inflammation."        Plast Reconstr Surg 129 (2012): 825-834.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Shenoy, R.K. "Clinical and pathological aspects of filarial lymphedema and its management." Korean J Parasitol 46 (2008): 119.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Medeiros, Zulma M., Amanda VB Vieira, Amanda T. Xavier and Gilberto SN Bezerra, et al. "Lymphatic filariasis: A systematic review on morbidity and its repercussions in countries in the Americas." Int J Environ Res Public Health 19 (2022): 316.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Rockson, Stanley G. and Kahealani K. Rivera. "Estimating the population burden of lymphedema." Ann N Y Acad Sci 1131 (2008): 147-154.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Schmit, P., Anne-Marie Prieur and Francis Brunelle. "Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and lymphoedema: lymphangiographic aspects."                Pediatr Radiol 29 (1999): 364-366.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Kim, Young-Je, Mi Ji Choi, Dong-Ho Bak and Byung Chul Lee, et al. "Topical administration of EGF suppresses immune response and protects skin barrier in DNCB-induced atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga mice." Sci Rep 8 (2018): 11895.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at