The Role of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Adult Cardiac Arrest: A Critical Review

Matthew Busvelle^*
*Correspondence: Matthew Busvelle, Department of Drug Science and Technology, University Hospital of Grenoble Alpes, 38700 La Tronche, France, Email:

Introduction

Cardiac arrest remains a significant public health concern worldwide, with high mortality rates despite advances in resuscitative efforts. In recent years, Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a valuable tool in the management of cardiac arrest. This article aims to explore the role of POCUS in adult cardiac arrest, including its benefits, limitations, and future directions. Point-of-care ultrasound involves the use of portable ultrasound devices by clinicians at the patient's bedside to aid in rapid diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making [1]. POCUS allows clinicians to quickly identify potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest, such as hypovolemia, cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, and massive pulmonary embolism. Timely recognition of these conditions can guide targeted interventions and improve patient outcomes [2].

POCUS enables real-time assessment of cardiac activity during resuscitation efforts. Clinicians can visualize cardiac motion, evaluate for the presence of Electromechanical Dissociation (EMD), and guide the initiation and optimization of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) techniques. Proper placement of the endotracheal tube is crucial during cardiac arrest management. POCUS can be sed to confirm endotracheal tube placement by visualizing lung sliding or bilateral lung pulse, thus reducing the risk of complications associated with misplaced tubes [3].

Description

Serial POCUS examinations allow clinicians to monitor the response to interventions, such as fluid resuscitation, pericardiocentesis, or thoracostomy, in real-time. This dynamic assessment helps guide ongoing resuscitative efforts and adapt treatment strategies as needed. POCUS complements traditional ACLS algorithms by providing additional diagnostic information and guiding targeted interventions. Integrating POCUS into resuscitation protocols can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of cardiac arrest management. Proficiency in POCUS requires specialized training and ongoing practice. In high-stress situations such as cardiac arrest, the quality of ultrasound images may be compromised, leading to interpretation errors. Performing POCUS during cardiac arrest requires time and may interrupt other critical aspects of resuscitation efforts. Clinicians must balance the need for diagnostic information with the urgency of providing timely interventions. Access to portable ultrasound devices may be limited in certain clinical settings, particularly in prehospital or resource-limited environments. Ensuring adequate availability of POCUS equipment is essential for its effective implementation in cardiac arrest management. Despite its current limitations, POCUS holds great promise in improving outcomes for patients in cardiac arrest [4].

Development of standardized training programs for POCUS in cardiac arrest to ensure uniform proficiency among clinicians across different healthcare settings. Incorporation of POCUS protocols into existing resuscitation guidelines to provide clear recommendations for its use during cardiac arrest management. Continued advancements in ultrasound technology, such as handheld devices with improved image quality and automated algorithms for rapid interpretation, to enhance the usability of POCUS in high-stress environments. Large-scale multicenter trials to evaluate the impact of POCUS on patient outcomes in cardiac arrest, including survival rates, neurological outcomes and long-term quality of life [5].

Conclusion

Point-of-care ultrasound is a valuable adjunctive tool in the management of adult cardiac arrest, offering real-time diagnostic information and guiding targeted interventions. While challenges exist, ongoing research and innovation hold the potential to further optimize the role of POCUS in improving outcomes for patients in cardiac arrest. Clinicians must continue to explore and integrate POCUS into resuscitation protocols to maximize its benefits and enhance the quality of care provided during cardiac arrest emergencies.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Gitto, Lorenzo, Serenella Serinelli, Francesco P. Busardò and Valeria Panebianco, et al. "Can post-mortem computed tomography be considered an alternative for autopsy in deaths due to hemopericardium?."J Geriat Cardiol: JGC11 (2014): 363.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Paul, Jonathan A. and Oliver PF Panzer. "Point-of-care ultrasound in cardiac arrest."Anesthesiol135 (2021): 508-519.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Soar, Jasmeet, Jerry P. Nolan, Bernd W. Böttiger and Gavin D. Perkins, et al. "European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support."Resuscitation95 (2015): 100-147.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Rocca, Eduardo, Christian Zanza, Yaroslava Longhitano and Fabio Piccolella, et al. "Lung ultrasound in critical care and emergency medicine: Clinical review."Adv Respirat Med91 (2023): 203-223.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Panchal, Ashish R., Jason A. Bartos, José G. Cabañas and Michael W. Donnino, et al. "Part 3: Adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care."Circulation142 (2020): S366-S468.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at