Mini Review - (2024) Volume 10, Issue 1
Received: 23-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. aso-24-132863;
Editor assigned: 25-Jan-2024, Pre QC No. P-132863;
Reviewed: 08-Feb-2024, QC No. Q-132863;
Revised: 13-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. R-132863;
Published:
20-Feb-2024
, DOI: 10.37421/2471-2671.2024.10.87
Citation: Choe, Hika. “The Role of Surgery in Metastatic Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review of Molecular Characteristics.” Arch Surg Oncol 10 (2024): 87.
Copyright: © 2024 Choe H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Metastatic melanoma represents a formidable challenge in oncology due to its aggressive nature and propensity for spreading to distant sites. While systemic therapies have revolutionized the management of metastatic melanoma, surgical interventions remain integral components of treatment strategies. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the role of surgery in metastatic melanoma, highlighting recent advancements in understanding melanoma's molecular characteristics and their implications for surgical management. One significant advancement is the recognition of the importance of complete surgical resection in achieving optimal outcomes for patients with metastatic melanoma. Surgeons strive to achieve clear margins while minimizing functional and cosmetic impact, often utilizing techniques such as Mohs micrographic surgery or sentinel lymph node biopsy to enhance precision and minimize tissue damage. Moreover, the advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques has expanded treatment options for metastatic melanoma patients. Procedures such as laparoscopic or robotic-assisted surgery offer the potential for faster recovery times, reduced postoperative pain, and improved cosmetic outcomes compared to traditional open surgery.
Metastatic • Implications • Melanoma
Melanoma, originating from melanocytes, is notorious for its ability to metastasize early, leading to poor prognosis in advanced stages. Despite significant advancements in systemic therapies, including immunotherapy and targeted therapy, surgical intervention remains crucial in the management of metastatic melanoma. Understanding the molecular characteristics of melanoma has reshaped treatment paradigms, allowing for more personalized surgical approaches tailored to individual patients [1].
Melanoma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by various genetic alterations, including mutations in BRAF, NRAS, and KIT genes, among others. BRAF mutations, particularly V600E, are prevalent in approximately 50% of melanomas and have become a key therapeutic target. NRAS mutations occur in approximately 15-20% of melanomas, while KIT mutations are less common but are associated with acral and mucosal melanomas. Moreover, molecular profiling has identified distinct subtypes of melanoma, such as cutaneous, acral, mucosal, and uveal melanomas, each with unique genomic features and clinical behaviors. Additionally, the tumor microenvironment, immune evasion mechanisms, and interactions with stromal cells play pivotal roles in melanoma progression and response to therapy. Surgical excision of the primary melanoma is the initial step in treatment, aiming for complete removal with negative margins. This reduces the risk of local recurrence and may confer survival benefits, particularly in early-stage disease [2,3].
Lymph node involvement is a crucial prognostic factor in melanoma. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) allows for accurate staging and facilitates targeted lymphadenectomy in cases of nodal metastasis. Complete Lymph Node Dissection (CLND) may be performed for regional control, although its therapeutic benefit remains debated. Surgical resection of metastatic lesions, termed metastasectomy, is indicated in select patients with limited metastatic disease, preferably in the setting of oligometastases. This approach aims to achieve local disease control, alleviate symptoms, and potentially prolong survival. Metastasectomy may involve resection of pulmonary, hepatic, or other distant metastases, often in combination with systemic therapies. In the era of adjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy, the role of adjuvant surgery in metastatic melanoma is evolving. Resection of residual disease following systemic therapy or consolidation surgery after a complete response may be considered in certain cases to minimize the risk of recurrence [3,4].
Techniques such as laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery have gained popularity in the resection of metastatic melanoma, offering reduced morbidity, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery times compared to traditional open approaches. Fluorescence-guided surgery utilizing nearinfrared imaging agents allows for real-time visualization of tumor margins and lymphatic drainage pathways, facilitating more precise resections and lymph node dissections. The adoption of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) has revolutionized the management of regional lymph nodes in melanoma, minimizing the morbidity associated with complete lymph node dissection while providing accurate staging information. Intraoperative assessment of surgical margins and lymph nodes using techniques such as frozen section analysis enables immediate decision-making regarding the extent of resection and the need for additional procedures [5,6].
In conclusion, surgery remains an integral component of the multimodal approach to metastatic melanoma, offering both therapeutic and prognostic benefits. Advances in our understanding of melanoma's molecular characteristics have facilitated more personalized surgical strategies, optimizing outcomes for patients with this aggressive malignancy. Continued research efforts aimed at elucidating the complex biology of melanoma and refining surgical techniques are essential for further improving patient outcomes in the future. and refining surgical techniques are essential for further improving patient outcomes in the future.
None.
None.
Archives of Surgical Oncology received 37 citations as per Google Scholar report