The Silent Extinction of Species and Taxonomists—An Appeal to Science Policymakers and Legislators

Jatia Bidipiebukire

Introduction

In the intricate tapestry of life on Earth, every species plays a crucial role. Yet, amidst the breathtaking diversity, a silent crisis is unfolding the extinction of both species and the taxonomists who document and understand them. This article delves into the interconnectedness of these phenomena, highlighting their implications, and urging science policymakers and legislators to take decisive action.

Description

The planet is currently experiencing a biodiversity crisis of unprecedented magnitude. Species are disappearing at an alarming rate, with extinction rates estimated to be 1,000 to 10,000 times higher than the natural background rate. Human activities such as habitat destruction, climate change, pollution, overexploitation, and invasive species introduction are driving this crisis. Each extinction reverberates through ecosystems, disrupting delicate balances and diminishing resilience. The loss of species has far-reaching consequences. Ecosystem services upon which humanity relies, such as pollination, pest control, and nutrient cycling, are compromised. Furthermore, the loss of biodiversity undermines the potential for scientific and medical discoveries. Many species hold untapped genetic resources that could lead to breakthroughs in fields like medicine, agriculture, and biotechnology. Despite growing awareness of the importance of biodiversity, conservation efforts often fall short. Limited funding, inadequate enforcement of regulations and political indifference hinder effective action. Additionally, the sheer magnitude of the crisis overwhelms existing conservation frameworks [1].

Concurrently, the field of taxonomy the science of classifying and describing species is facing its own crisis. Taxonomists, the scientists responsible for identifying, naming, and categorizing organisms, are dwindling in number. This decline poses a significant threat to our understanding and conservation of biodiversity. Several factors contribute to the decline of taxonomists. Funding for taxonomy research is often scarce, with resources allocated primarily to more applied fields. Additionally, taxonomic expertise requires specialized training and mentorship, which is becoming increasingly inaccessible due to budget cuts in education and research institutions. Moreover, the role of taxonomists is undervalued in academic and scientific circles. Publications in prestigious journals and securing grants often prioritize research with immediate practical applications over taxonomic studies. Consequently, aspiring scientists are discouraged from pursuing careers in taxonomy, exacerbating the shortage of experts in the field. The intertwined crises of species extinction and taxonomic decline have profound implications for biodiversity conservation and our understanding of the natural world. Without taxonomists to document and classify species, our ability to monitor and mitigate biodiversity loss is severely compromised [2].

Taxonomic expertise is essential for identifying endangered species, delineating conservation priorities, and assessing the impact of human activities on ecosystems. Furthermore, the loss of taxonomic knowledge undermines the foundation of biological sciences. Taxonomy provides the framework upon which other disciplines, such as ecology, evolution, and biogeography, rely. Without accurate species identifications and classifications, research in these areas becomes less reliable and meaningful. Moreover, taxonomic knowledge is essential for effective policymaking and environmental management. Conservation policies and regulations rely on accurate species identifications and assessments of their ecological roles. Without taxonomic expertise, policymakers risk implementing ineffective or harmful measures that exacerbate rather than alleviate biodiversity loss. Addressing the crises of species extinction and taxonomic decline requires concerted action at the local, national, and global levels. Science policymakers and legislators play a pivotal role in shaping policies and allocating resources to tackle these challenges effectively. Governments and funding agencies should prioritize investment in taxonomy research, including grants for taxonomic studies, training programs for aspiring taxonomists, and infrastructure for specimen collections and research facilities. Conservation initiatives must incorporate taxonomic expertise into their planning and implementation [3,4].

Taxonomists should be actively involved in species assessments, habitat conservation planning, and monitoring programs to ensure accurate and effective conservation strategies. Educational institutions and scientific organizations should promote the importance of taxonomy and provide opportunities for students to pursue careers in the field. Outreach efforts aimed at raising public awareness about the role of taxonomists in biodiversity conservation are also crucial. : Biodiversity knows no borders, and addressing its loss requires international cooperation. Governments, scientific organizations, and conservation NGOs should collaborate across national boundaries to share resources, data, and expertise in taxonomy and conservation. Academic institutions, scientific journals, and funding agencies should recognize and reward taxonomic research and expertise. This includes valuing taxonomic publications, providing career advancement opportunities for taxonomists, and allocating funding for taxonomic research projects [5].

Conclusion

The silent extinction of species and taxonomists represents a critical threat to global biodiversity and our understanding of the natural world. Urgent action is needed to address these intertwined crises and safeguard the diversity of life on Earth. Science policymakers and legislators must prioritize funding for taxonomy, integrate taxonomic expertise into conservation efforts, promote taxonomic education and outreach, strengthen international collaboration, and recognize the vital contributions of taxonomists. Only through concerted and coordinated efforts can we hope to reverse the tide of biodiversity loss and ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.

Acknowledgement

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

1. Dubois, Alain, Pierre André Crochet, Edward C. Dickinson and André Nemésio, et al. "Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems related to the electronic publication of new nomina and nomenclatural acts in zoology, with brief comments on optical discs and on the situation in botany." (2013).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Wilson, Edward O. "The biological diversity crisis." BioScience 35 (1985): 700-706.

Google Scholar

3. Orr, michael cc, john s. Ascher, ming bai, douglas chesters and chao-dong zhu. "Three questions: How can taxonomists survive and thrive worldwide?." Megataxa 1 (2020): 19-27.

Google Scholar, Crossref 

4. Hammond, Peter. "Species inventory." In Global biodiversity: status of the earth’s living resources, pp. 17-39. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992.

Google Scholar

5. Gotelli, Nicholas J and Anne Chao. "Measuring and estimating species richness, species diversity, and biotic similarity from sampling data." Encyclopedia of biodiversity (2013): 195-211.

Google Scholar, Indexed at