GET THE APP

The Sociology of Fashion: How Clothing Shapes Identity and Class
..

Arts and Social Sciences Journal

ISSN: 2151-6200

Open Access

Short Communication - (2025) Volume 16, Issue 1

The Sociology of Fashion: How Clothing Shapes Identity and Class

Stuart Alshayeb*
*Correspondence: Stuart Alshayeb, Department of Marketing and International Business, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, 6th October City, Egypt, Email:
Department of Marketing and International Business, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, 6th October City, Egypt

Received: 01-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. assj-25-161998; Editor assigned: 03-Jan-2025, Pre QC No. P-161998; Reviewed: 17-Jan-2025, QC No. Q-161998; Revised: 22-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. R-161998; Published: 29-Jan-2025 , DOI: 10.37421/2151-6200.2025.16.650
Citation: Alshayeb, Stuart. “The Sociology of Fashion: How Clothing Shapes Identity and Class.” Arts Social Sci J 16 (2025): 650.
Copyright: © 2025 Alshayeb S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Fashion is more than just clothing; it is a powerful social and cultural phenomenon that shapes identity, reflects class distinctions, and communicates personal and collective values. Throughout history, fashion has been used as a means of self-expression, a marker of social status, and a tool for cultural representation. From aristocratic garments that signified wealth and power to streetwear that challenges traditional norms, clothing plays a crucial role in constructing individual and group identities. Fashion is also influenced by economic and technological advancements, reflecting changes in society over time. By examining the sociology of fashion, we can better understand how clothing choices are shaped by class structures, cultural heritage, and social movements, as well as how they contribute to the reinforcement or disruption of social hierarchies [1].

Description

Fashion serves as a symbol of identity, allowing individuals to express their personalities, beliefs, and affiliations. Clothing choices can signal gender, ethnicity, profession, or even political ideology. For example, in many cultures, traditional garments such as the sari in India, the kimono in Japan, or the hijab in Islamic societies serve not only as markers of cultural heritage but also as expressions of identity and adherence to specific social norms. Similarly, subcultures such as punk, goth, or hip-hop use distinct styles to challenge mainstream fashion, creating unique identities that differentiate them from dominant societal trends. Fashion also plays a role in gender identity, with evolving norms challenging traditional distinctions between masculine and feminine attire, as seen in the increasing popularity of androgynous and unisex clothing. Beyond personal identity, fashion has historically been a marker of social class. Even today, designer brands and luxury fashion serve as modernday status symbols, reinforcing social divisions [2].

High-end fashion houses like Chanel, Gucci, and Louis Vuitton cater to the wealthy, while fast fashion brands provide affordable alternatives for the masses. However, the rise of thrift culture and secondhand fashion has also challenged traditional class-based distinctions, allowing people to access high-end styles at lower costs while promoting sustainability. Fashion is also a reflection of historical and cultural transformations. Different eras have seen fashion evolve in response to social and political changes. The flapper dresses of the 1920s symbolized women’s liberation, as they rejected restrictive Victorian corsets in favor of more comfortable and expressive attire. The 1960s and 1970s saw the rise of countercultural fashion, with bell-bottoms, tie dye, and Afro hairstyles representing resistance against mainstream ideals. More recently, the rise of streetwear has blurred the lines between high fashion and casual attire, with brands like Supreme and Off-White merging urban influences with luxury branding. The democratization of fashion, enabled by social media and digital commerce, has also allowed emerging designers and influencers to challenge traditional industry norms, bringing diverse voices into the mainstream [3].

Fashion is deeply intertwined with consumerism and capitalism, as the fashion industry thrives on continuous cycles of consumption. The emergence of fast fashion, characterized by inexpensive, rapidly produced clothing, has made trendy fashion more accessible but has also raised concerns about ethical labor practices and environmental sustainability. Companies like Zara and H&M produce new collections at an unprecedented pace, fueling a culture of disposability where garments are worn briefly before being discarded. This cycle has significant consequences, including exploitative labor conditions in garment factories and the accumulation of textile waste. In contrast, the slow fashion movement, which emphasizes ethical sourcing, sustainability, and timeless designs, seeks to counter the negative effects of overproduction and consumption. In addition to class and identity, fashion has played an important role in political and social activism. Clothing has been used to make powerful statements, from the Black Panthers’ all-black leather attire symbolizing resistance to the pink pussyhats worn during the Women’s March as a form of feminist protest. The fashion industry itself has increasingly embraced social and political causes, with brands advocating for inclusivity, racial justice, and gender equality [4].

Campaigns promoting body positivity and diverse representation have challenged traditional beauty standards, pushing for greater acceptance of different body types, skin tones, and gender expressions. However, some critics argue that corporate brands exploit social movements for profit, engaging in “woke washing” without making meaningful contributions to the causes they claim to support. Despite its role in shaping identity and class structures, fashion is also highly dynamic, constantly evolving in response to cultural shifts, technological advancements, and economic conditions. The digital age has transformed fashion consumption, with social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok serving as major influencers of style trends. Fashion influencers and online content creators now have the power to shape consumer preferences, often rivaling traditional fashion magazines and runway shows. The rise of digital fashion and virtual clothing where people purchase and wear digital outfits in online spaces reflects the increasing intersection between technology and personal expression. Ultimately, fashion is not just about aesthetics; it is a social and cultural force that both reflects and influences society. It shapes how individuals see themselves and how they are perceived by others challenging social norms. As the fashion industry continues to evolve, ongoing discussions about inclusivity, sustainability, and ethical production will play a crucial role in determining its future [5].

Conclusion

The sociology of fashion reveals that clothing is much more than a functional necessity; it is a tool for self-expression, a marker of social class, and a reflection of cultural and political shifts. From historical class distinctions to modern activism, fashion continues to shape identity and influence societal structures. While progress has been made in terms of inclusivity and accessibility, challenges such as fast fashion’s environmental impact, labor exploitation, and corporate appropriation of social movements remain pressing issues. As society becomes more aware of these challenges, the future of fashion may lean toward more ethical and sustainable practices, ensuring that clothing continues to serve as a meaningful and empowering medium of selfexpression.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Joo, So Young, Yoon Soo Cho, Jisu Seo and Yurim Seo, et al. "Motion-Mimicking Robotic Finger Prosthesis for Burn-induced Partial Hand Amputee: A Case Report." J Burn Care Res 46 (2025): 230-235.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Guo, Kai, Jingxin Lu and Hongbo Yang. "Simulation and experimental study on rope driven artificial hand and driven motor." Technol Health Care 32 (2024): 287-297.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Salamon, Steven and William Maxwell Chisholm Maxwell. "Storage of ram semen." Anim Reprod Sci 62 (2000): 77-111.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Wolterink, Gerjan, Pedro Dias, Remco GP Sanders and Frodo Muijzer, et al. "Development of soft semg sensing structures using 3d-printing technologies." Sensors 20 (2020): 4292.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Lee, Haemin, JongHoo Park, Brian Byunghyun Kang and Kyu-Jin Cho. "Single-step 3D printing of bio-inspired printable joints applied to a prosthetic hand." 3D Print Add Manufact 102023): 917-929.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1413

Arts and Social Sciences Journal received 1413 citations as per Google Scholar report

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward