Treatment and Rehabilitation Strategies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Oliver N^*
*Correspondence: Oliver N, Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia, Tel: 1596832417, Email:

Introduction

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are two examples of the chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract that constitute the inflammatory bowel disease. These illnesses have developed into significant public health issues. With the introduction of targeted biologic therapies, the improvement of more established therapies, such as immune modulators and 5-Aminosalicylic Acid (5-ASA), and a deeper comprehension of the mucosal immune system and the genetics involved in the pathogenesis of IBD, medical treatment for IBD has advanced significantly over the past ten years. The purpose of IBD therapy is to achieve and sustain remission. According to the current paradigm of care, aggressive, potent medicines are only used after milder ones with fewer side effects have failed or when patients claim they have a severe disease [1].

Products containing mesalamine are occasionally used to treat crohn's disease, although they are ineffective and do not have FDA approval. Both standard corticosteroid formulations and budesonide with ileal release are efficient. Even though they have not been licenced for the treatment of crohn's disease, the oral immunosuppressive medications azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and methotrexate are occasionally used. These medications have a poor effectiveness and a slow onset, making them more suitable for maintenance than remission.

Currently available anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) medications include certolizumab pegol, adalimumab, and infliximab (Remicade, Janssen) (Cimzia, UCB). Both the treatment and rehabilitation of crohn's disease can be effectively carried out with these medications, however not all patients respond to them equally. The anti-alpha-4 beta-7 integrin antibody vedolizumab was authorised for the treatment and maintenance of crohn's disease. Due to its rather late onset, this medication is a little more effective for management than for cure. Even though it is taken intravenously, it is selective in its target; therefore it lacks the anti-TNF agent's properties for serious infection and cancer. Vedolizumab is increasingly used as the firstline biologic therapy because it typically produces superior outcomes in patients who have not previously used anti-TNF medications and because it is probably safer than anti-TNF medications.

Mesalamine is unquestionably beneficial for both treatment and rehabilitation in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. The next line of treatment for the roughly half of the patients who do not respond to mesalamine therapy is either traditional corticosteroids or multimatrix budesonide which distributes the medication to the colon. From there, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine, neither of which is permitted for ulcerative colitis, are occasionally used. Their effectiveness is limited, and they could have negative side effects such non-Hodgkin lymphoma, drug-induced pancreatitis, skin cancer, bone marrow suppression, infection, and other complications.

Description

Infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab are three anti-TNF medications that have been authorised for remission of ulcerative colitis. These medications come with black box warnings for lymphoma, TB, and other opportunistic illnesses. Vedolizumab is corticosteroid-sparing and efficacious for remission and maintenance in ulcerative colitis. Vedolizumab is being used more frequently than in Crohn's disease as a first-line biologic therapy for ulcerative colitis because of its good efficacy profile and superior safety to anti-TNF medications.

The FDA is mandating that therapies demonstrate not only an improvement in the disease's signs and symptoms but also an improvement in endoscopic disease activity and, ideally, the healing of the gut mucosa. Therefore other parameters are increasingly being monitored in clinical studies. To make sure that the symptoms patients are experiencing are actually caused by active ulcerative colitis or crohn's disease before making major treatment decisions, endoscopy is still frequently performed on patients in clinical practice.

Patients should be rescoped after 4 to 6 months of treatment to make sure the bowel is fully recovered since some patients will feel better clinically but do not have their bowels healed completely, and it appears that bowel healing improves long-term prognosis. Drugs such as Infliximab's biosimilar was recently approved by the FDA and many more are anticipated. Nearly 19 biosimilars to adalimumab are now being developed, and there are at least that many biosimilars to infliximab. The question of whether biosimilars are therapeutically interchangeable with the innovator compound is one that doctors still have to examine in detail [2].

Ulcerative colitis produces persistent inflammation in a specific area of the digestive tract whereas crohn's disease causes inflammation anywhere along the digestive tract's lining (mainly the colon). IBD's precise aetiology is not well understood. The development of this group of disorders has been linked to a number of causes, including but not limited to bacterial infection, alterations in the immune system, and genetic differences. For instance, a NOD2 gene mutation increases IBD susceptibility by causing the release of proinflammatory cytokines.

Although genetic predisposition is important in immune mediated illnesses, environmental variables tend to have the biggest impact. In fact, according to recent studies, autoimmune illnesses are more common in highly industrialized countries than in less developed ones. In addition, research has showed that smoking raises the incidence of crohn's disease and that greater consumption of polyunsaturated fatty acids, animal protein, and milk protein can increase the risk for IBD [3].

Conclusion

IBD cannot be cured completely, but there is enough proof that a number of medicinal substances can reduce the intestinal inflammation. Anti-inflammatory substances can stop the production of cytokines like TNF and IFN, but they also have unpleasant side effects such nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea. Artificial cell microencapsulation has shown encouraging results in terms of reducing these negative effects and boosting the control of intestinal inflammation when used as a drug delivery strategy.

For the ultimate commercialization of new IBD medicines, more research both in animal models and clinical trials is required to validate the newer and potentially more successful treatment alternatives. Clinical trials that are currently being conducted and those that will be conducted in the future will provide information that will help us better understand the mechanism of intestinal inflammation in IBD and could have a big impact on how the disease is treated.

References

1. Pithadia, Anand B, and Sunita Jain. "Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)." Pharmacol Rep 63 (2011): 629-642.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Sandborn, William J. "The present and future of inflammatory bowel disease treatment." Gastroenterol Hepatol 12 (2016): 438.
3. Fakhoury, Marc, Rebecca Negrulj, Armin Mooranian, and Hani Al-Salami, et al. "Inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and treatments." J Inflamm Res 7 (2014): 113-120.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]