Two-Stage Deep Learning Classifier Employing Metabolites for Lung Cancer Diagnosis

Asvin Sudduchai^*
*Correspondence: Asvin Sudduchai, Department Oncology, University of California, San Diego, USA, Email:

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the deadliest and most prevalent forms of cancer worldwide, with a high mortality rate primarily due to late-stage diagnosis. Early detection is critical for improving patient outcomes. Metabolomics, the study of small molecules known as metabolites, has emerged as a promising approach for identifying potential biomarkers for early cancer diagnosis. This article delves into a novel two-stage deep learning classifier that employs metabolites as biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis. We explore the significance of metabolomics in cancer research, the development of deep learning models, and the potential impact of this approach on the early detection and treatment of lung cancer. Lung cancer remains a global health concern, with a high incidence rate and a particularly poor survival rate, largely attributed to latestage diagnosis. Early detection is crucial for improving survival rates and the overall quality of life for affected individuals. Metabolomics, a discipline within the realm of omics sciences, focuses on the study of small molecules known as metabolites. These metabolites play vital roles in various biochemical processes within the body. In the context of lung cancer, metabolomics can unveil unique metabolic profiles that may serve as early diagnostic markers [1].

In recent years, deep learning, a subset of artificial intelligence, has gained significant attention for its remarkable capabilities in pattern recognition and classification. Combining metabolomics with deep learning presents a powerful approach to lung cancer diagnosis. This article explores the development and potential impact of a two-stage deep learning classifier employing metabolites as biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis. Metabolomics is an integral component of systems biology, aiming to understand the complex interplay between an organism's genetics and its environment by studying the metabolites that are produced and consumed within biological systems. Metabolites are small molecules that act as the final products of cellular processes, and their levels can change in response to various physiological and pathological conditions, including cancer.

Metabolomics can identify specific metabolites that are associated with the presence of cancer. These metabolites, often referred to as biomarkers, can serve as indicators of disease and offer valuable insights into early diagnosis and treatment. Understanding Pathophysiological Mechanisms: Metabolomics can provide insights into the biochemical and metabolic alterations that occur in cancer cells. This understanding is critical for developing targeted therapies and personalized treatment By analyzing changes in metabolite profiles, researchers can assess the effectiveness of cancer treatments and make necessary adjustments to improve patient outcomes.

Lung cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease with different subtypes, including Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). Metabolomics studies have revealed distinct metabolic profiles associated with lung cancer, suggesting the potential of metabolites as diagnostic and prognostic markers. Metabolomics research has identified specific metabolites that are dysregulated in lung cancer. For instance, studies have shown that metabolites such as lactate, glucose, glutamine, and certain amino acids exhibit altered levels in lung cancer patients. These metabolites may serve as biomarkers for early detection [2].

Description

Metabolomics can help differentiate between NSCLC and SCLC, which have distinct molecular profiles. This differentiation is crucial as it can guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes. The ability to detect lung cancer at an early stage is essential for improving survival rates. Metabolites associated with lung cancer may be detectable in bodily fluids, making it possible to develop non-invasive diagnostic tests. Deep learning, a subset of machine learning and artificial intelligence, has garnered significant attention for its ability to process and analyze large and complex datasets. In the healthcare sector, deep learning has been applied to various tasks, including medical image analysis, disease diagnosis, drug discovery, and patient outcome prediction [3].

Deep learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have revolutionized medical image analysis. They can accurately detect and classify anomalies in medical images, such as X-rays, MRIs, and CT scans, facilitating the early diagnosis of diseases like cancer. Deep learning models have demonstrated remarkable accuracy in disease diagnosis. By training on diverse patient data, these models can recognize patterns and predict the likelihood of a disease, including cancer, based on various features and markers. Deep learning is instrumental in drug discovery by identifying potential drug candidates and predicting their effectiveness. This accelerates the drug development process, ultimately leading to more effective treatments.

Deep learning can aid in the development of personalized treatment plans by considering a patient's genetic, molecular, and clinical data. This approach tailors therapies to individual patients, increasing treatment efficacy. The integration of metabolomics and deep learning holds great promise for lung cancer diagnosis. The process involves two distinct stages: feature extraction and classification. The first stage focuses on the extraction of relevant features or metabolites from the data. This involves collecting metabolomic data from patient samples, such as blood or urine, and using analytical techniques such as mass spectrometry or Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to identify and quantify metabolites.

The raw metabolomic data is typically noisy and high-dimensional. Data preprocessing steps, such as normalization, scaling, and missing value imputation, are essential to ensure that the data is suitable for deep learning analysis. Feature selection techniques are employed to reduce the dimensionality of the data by identifying the most informative metabolites. This step helps in mitigating the "curse of dimensionality" and enhances the model's performance. Metabolomics data can be integrated with other clinical data, such as patient demographics, genetic information, and medical history, to enhance the overall predictive power of the model [4,5].

Conclusion

The second stage involves the development of deep learning models for classifying patients as either cancer-positive or cancer-negative based on their metabolite profiles. Deep learning models like Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), CNNs, and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) can be adapted for the classification task. Model selection depends on the nature of the data and the complexity of the problem. The selected deep learning model is trained on a labeled dataset of patient samples with known cancer status. Training involves optimizing model parameters to minimize classification errors. Validation is performed to assess the model's performance on unseen data. The deep learning model should provide insights into which metabolites or features contribute most to the classification decision. Interpretability is crucial for understanding the biological relevance of the model's predictions.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

1. Rawla, Prashanth, Tagore Sunkara and Vinaya Gaduputi. "Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: Global trends, etiology and risk factors." World J Oncol 10 (2019): 10.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. D’Haese, Jan G., Mark Hartel, Ihsan Ekin Demir and Ulf Hinz, et al. "Pain sensation in pancreatic diseases is not uniform: The different facets of pancreatic pain." World J Gastroenterol 20 (2014): 9154.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Renz, Bernhard W., Takayuki Tanaka, Masaki Sunagawa and Ryota Takahashi, et al. "Cholinergic signaling via muscarinic receptors directly and indirectly suppresses pancreatic tumorigenesis and cancer stemness." Cancer Discov 8 (2018): 1458-1473.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Demir, Ihsan Ekin, Helmut Friess and Güralp O. Ceyhan. "Neural plasticity in pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer." Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 12 (2015): 649-659.

 Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Chatterjee, Deyali, Matthew H. Katz, Asif Rashid and Hua Wang, et al. "Perineural and intra-neural invasion in posttherapy pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens predicts poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma." Am J Surg Pathol 36 (2012): 409.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at