Ultrasound-guided Balloon Tamponade for Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Analysis

Abhinit Shankland^*
*Correspondence: Abhinit Shankland, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 60-572 Poznan, Poland, Email:

Introduction

Postpartum Hemorrhage (PPH) remains a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in low-resource settings. Despite advances in obstetric care, PPH continues to challenge healthcare providers due to its unpredictable nature and potential for rapid deterioration. In recent years, various interventions have been developed to manage PPH effectively, including pharmacological agents, uterine compression techniques and surgical interventions. Among these interventions, ultrasound-guided balloon tamponade has emerged as a promising option for the management of refractory PPH. Ultrasound-guided balloon tamponade involves the insertion of a balloon catheter into the uterine cavity, which is then inflated to exert pressure on the bleeding vessels and promote hemostasis. The procedure is guided by ultrasound imaging, allowing for precise placement of the balloon and monitoring of its efficacy in real-time. This technique offers several advantages over traditional methods, including non-invasiveness, ease of placement and the ability to be performed at the bedside [1,2].

Description

The retrospective analysis presented in this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided balloon tamponade in the management of PPH. A comprehensive review of medical records from insert timeframe was conducted to identify cases of PPH treated with balloon tamponade at our institution. Data pertaining to patient demographics, obstetric history, clinical presentation, management approach and outcomes were collected and analysed. The study included insert number patients who underwent ultrasound-guided balloon tamponade for PPH during the study period. The majority of patients presented with primary PPH, while a smaller proportion had secondary PPH following caesarean section or other obstetric interventions. The most common etiologies of PPH included uterine atony, retained placental tissue and genital tract trauma. Ultrasound-guided balloon tamponade was performed using standardized protocols by experienced obstetricians and ultrasound operators. The procedure involved the insertion of a balloon catheter into the uterine cavity under ultrasound guidance, followed by inflation of the balloon to achieve hemostasis. The volume of saline or other inflation media used varied depending on individual patient characteristics and the severity of hemorrhage. Key outcomes assessed in the analysis included the rate of successful hemostasis, need for additional interventions, complications associated with balloon tamponade, length of hospital stay and maternal mortality. Additionally, factors influencing the success of balloon tamponade, such as the timing of intervention, balloon placement and concurrent use of uterotonic agents, were explored. During the procedure, meticulous attention is paid to ensuring proper placement of the balloon catheter within the uterine cavity under ultrasound guidance. This step is crucial for achieving effective compression of the bleeding vessels and promoting hemostasis. The use of ultrasound allows for real-time visualization of the uterine anatomy and identification of any potential abnormalities or obstacles that may affect balloon placement [2,3].

Once the balloon catheter is inserted into the uterine cavity, it is inflated gradually with saline or another appropriate fluid. The volume of fluid used for inflation is titrated based on individual patient factors, including the severity of hemorrhage and the size of the uterine cavity. Care is taken to avoid over-inflation, which could potentially cause uterine rupture or other complications. Throughout the procedure, continuous monitoring of the patient's vital signs and uterine tone is essential to assess the effectiveness of balloon tamponade and detect any signs of complications promptly. Close communication between obstetricians, anesthesiologists and other members of the multidisciplinary team is critical for ensuring a coordinated and timely response to any unexpected events or challenges that may arise during the procedure. Following successful placement and inflation of the balloon catheter, patients are closely monitored in a high-dependency or intensive care setting to assess their response to treatment and ensure ongoing hemodynamic stability. Repeat ultrasound examinations may be performed to confirm the position of the balloon and evaluate the degree of uterine compression. In cases where balloon tamponade alone is insufficient to control hemorrhage, additional interventions such as uterotonic agents, blood transfusion, or surgical procedures may be required. The decision to escalate treatment is based on clinical judgment and the individual patient's response to therapy. Overall, ultrasound-guided balloon tamponade represents a valuable tool in the management of postpartum hemorrhage, offering a minimally invasive and effective means of achieving hemostasis in cases of refractory bleeding. With careful patient selection, meticulous technique and close monitoring, this intervention has the potential to significantly reduce maternal morbidity and mortality associated with PPH [4,5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, ultrasound-guided balloon tamponade represents a valuable addition to the armamentarium for managing PPH. This retrospective analysis provides evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of this technique in achieving hemostasis and preventing maternal morbidity and mortality associated with PPH. The findings highlight the importance of early recognition and prompt intervention in cases of refractory PPH, as well as the role of ultrasound guidance in optimizing the placement and monitoring of balloon tamponade. Moving forward, further research is warranted to better define the optimal indications, techniques and outcomes associated with ultrasound-guided balloon tamponade. Prospective studies comparing balloon tamponade with other interventions, such as uterine artery embolization or surgical interventions, are needed to establish its place in the management algorithm for PPH. Additionally, efforts should be made to enhance training and proficiency in ultrasound-guided procedures among obstetric providers to ensure widespread access to this potentially life-saving intervention.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Knight, Marian, William M. Callaghan, Cynthia Berg and Sophie Alexander, et al. "Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in high resource countries: A review and recommendations from the International Postpartum Hemorrhage Collaborative Group." BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9 (2009): 1-10.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Oyelese, Yinka and Cande V. Ananth. "Postpartum hemorrhage: epidemiology, risk factors and causes." Clin Obstet Gynaecol 53 (2010): 147-156.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Jauniaux, Eric, Catey Bunce, Lene Grønbeck and Jens Langhoff-Roos. "Prevalence and main outcomes of placenta accreta spectrum: A systematic review and meta-analysis." Am J Obstet Gynecol 221 (2019): 208-218.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Reale, Sharon C., Sarah R. Easter, Xinling Xu and Brian T. Bateman, et al. "Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in the United States from 2010 to 2014." Anesth Analg 130 (2020): e119-e122.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Shields, Laurence E., Dena Goffman and Aaron B. Caughey. "Postpartum hemorrhage." Obstet Gynecol 130 (2017): E168-E186.
 

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at