Understanding Regional Variations in Under-Five Mortality in India: A Deep Dive into NFHS-4 Biometric Data

Bruce Stilier^*
*Correspondence: Bruce Stilier, Department of Biostatistics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Spain, Email:

Introduction

India has made substantial strides in improving maternal and child health over the past few decades, yet significant disparities in under-five mortality rates persist across its various regions. These regional disparities in child mortality are influenced by a variety of socio-economic, cultural, and healthcare-related factors. Understanding the drivers behind these differences is crucial for formulating targeted interventions that address the unique needs of each region. A research study focused on the National Family Health Survey 4 (NFHS-4) biometric data provides a deeper insight into these regional disparities in under-five mortality in India. This study combines biometric information with socio-economic data to uncover the underlying factors contributing to child mortality and to inform policy decisions aimed at improving child health outcomes.

Description

The National Family Health Survey (NFHS) is a large-scale, nationally representative survey conducted periodically in India to collect comprehensive data on various health, nutrition, and socio-economic indicators. NFHS-4, which was conducted between 2015 and 2016, is the fourth round of the survey and offers detailed insights into maternal and child health, family planning, nutrition, and a range of socio-economic factors affecting health outcomes across India. The data collected in this survey are invaluable for researchers, policymakers, and public health experts aiming to understand the current health landscape in India. Among the wealth of data gathered in NFHS-4, biometric data—such as anthropometric measurements (e.g., height, weight, and age) and fingerprint data—play a critical role in assessing the accuracy and reliability of child health indicators. Biometric data, particularly anthropometric measurements, are vital for evaluating under-nutrition and other health issues in children. These data can provide more accurate assessments of a child’s health and growth, ensuring that the findings are based on sound evidence rather than subjective reporting. For example, by utilizing biometric data such as accurate age determination, researchers can better assess child mortality patterns and identify which factors—whether socio-economic, environmental, or healthcare-related—contribute most to regional disparities [1].

The study focuses on understanding how these regional differences manifest in under-five mortality rates. By analyzing NFHS-4 data, including the biometric measurements, researchers can identify patterns of child mortality across different states and regions, revealing areas where mortality rates are higher or lower than expected. Advanced statistical methods such as regression analysis, which measures the strength of relationships between various factors and under-five mortality, are employed to quantify the impact of factors like healthcare access, education, socio-economic status, and nutrition on child survival rates. This allows researchers to pinpoint specific variables that contribute most significantly to the disparities in child mortality rates across regions. One of the most important findings of this study is that regions with higher under-five mortality rates tend to share common characteristics, such as lower levels of maternal education, limited access to healthcare facilities, and higher rates of under-nutrition. Conversely, regions with lower mortality rates tend to have better healthcare infrastructure, higher literacy rates, and more accessible nutrition programs. This information is critical for understanding the broader socio-economic and healthcare contexts in which under-five mortality is most pronounced, helping policymakers direct interventions more effectively [2].

In addition to providing more reliable health indicators, biometric data from NFHS-4 enhances the precision of analyses aimed at understanding the drivers of regional disparities in under-five mortality. For example, biometric data can improve the accuracy of age determination, which is essential for calculating mortality rates among children. Inaccurate age reporting can lead to skewed findings, particularly in regions where birth registration may not be consistent, or where children’s ages are estimated based on memory rather than official records. By using biometric data, such as fingerprints or other physical markers, researchers can more reliably establish a child’s age and ensure that the mortality rates calculated are accurate. Furthermore, biometric data, such as anthropometric measurements (e.g., height-for-age or weight-for-age ratios), can provide insights into child nutrition and growth patterns. Malnutrition is a leading cause of child mortality, and the study of biometric data can help determine which regions are most affected by malnutrition, thereby allowing for the development of targeted interventions. For instance, regions with high rates of stunting or wasting may require enhanced nutritional programs or greater access to clean water and sanitation to reduce child mortality [3,4].

Understanding the regional disparities in under-five mortality and their underlying causes has significant implications for policy development. With accurate data, including biometric data from the NFHS-4 survey, policymakers can design targeted interventions that address the specific needs of different regions. For example, regions with high mortality rates due to malnutrition may benefit from enhanced nutrition programs, while regions with poor healthcare access may need investments in healthcare infrastructure, such as the building of more clinics and hospitals or the training of healthcare workers [5].

Conclusion

The study’s insights into regional disparities can also guide resource allocation. Governments and international organizations can prioritize resources for areas with the highest levels of child mortality, ensuring that interventions are implemented where they are needed most. For instance, policy measures could include expanding access to immunization programs, improving prenatal and postnatal care, promoting maternal education, and addressing the broader socio-economic determinants of health, such as poverty and inadequate sanitation.

Moreover, the findings of this research can be used to raise awareness about the importance of addressing regional inequalities in child health. Public health campaigns that emphasize the significance of early childhood care, nutrition, and vaccination can be tailored to regions with the highest child mortality rates, helping to foster a culture of health and well-being.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Pope, Carra. "Biometric data collection in an unprotected world: Exploring the need for federal legislation protecting biometric data." JL & Pol'y 26 (2018): 769.

   Google Scholar

2. Ross, Arun, Sudipta Banerjee and Anurag Chowdhury. "Security in smart cities: A brief review of digital forensic schemes for biometric data." Pattern Recognit Lett 138 (2020): 346-354.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Sun, Yunlian, Man Zhang, Zhenan Sun and Tieniu Tan. "Demographic analysis from biometric data: Achievements, challenges, and new frontiers." IEEE (2017): 332-351.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Wright, Alexi A., Nikita Raman, Patrick Staples and Stephanie Schonholz, et al. "The hope pilot study: Harnessing patient-reported outcomes and biometric data to enhance cancer care." JCO 2 (2018): 1-12.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Kos, Marko and Iztok Kramberger. "A wearable device and system for movement and biometric data acquisition for sports applications." IEEE 5 (2017): 6411-6420.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at