Understanding the Immunopathology of Pulmonary Rejection after Murine Lung Transplantation

Spondina Kukisa^*
*Correspondence: Spondina Kukisa, Department of Immunochemistry, Kyorin University, 6-20-2, Arakawa, Japan, Email:

Introduction

Lung transplantation has emerged as a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage lung diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) and Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Despite advancements in surgical techniques, perioperative management and immunosuppressive therapies, pulmonary rejection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Pulmonary rejection can manifest as acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, or chronic rejection, collectively contributing to graft dysfunction and loss. In recent years, murine models of lung transplantation have provided invaluable insights into the immunopathological mechanisms underlying pulmonary rejection [1]. These models allow for the study of various aspects of the immune response to allografts and facilitate the development of novel therapeutic interventions to mitigate rejection and improve graft survival. This article provides a comprehensive review of the immunopathological mechanisms underlying pulmonary rejection after murine lung transplantation. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for the development of novel therapeutic strategies to improve graft survival and long-term outcomes in lung transplant recipients [2].

Description

Acute cellular rejection: Acute cellular rejection is characterized by the infiltration of the allograft by immune cells, primarily T lymphocytes. In murine models, acute rejection can be induced by adoptive transfer of allogeneic T cells or by direct transplantation of allogeneic lungs. The key cellular players involved in acute rejection include CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, which recognize donor antigens presented by recipient Antigen-Presenting Cells (APCs) in the context of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. The subsequent activation of T cells leads to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the recruitment of additional immune cells to the allograft, resulting in tissue damage and dysfunction [3].

Antibody-mediated rejection: Antibody-mediated rejection is characterized by the presence of Donor-Specific Antibodies (DSAs) directed against Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) or other alloantigens expressed on the donor lung endothelium. In murine models, antibody-mediated rejection can be induced by passive transfer of DSAs or by genetic manipulation to express human HLA molecules in the donor lung. DSAs bind to the endothelial cells of the allograft, leading to complement activation, Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC) and endothelial injury. This results in microvascular thrombosis, ischemia-reperfusion injury and ultimately grafts dysfunction [4].

Chronic rejection: Chronic rejection, also known as Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) in clinical parlance, is the leading cause of long-term graft failure after lung transplantation. In murine models, chronic rejection can be induced by repetitive alloantigen exposure or by genetic manipulation to overexpress pro-fibrotic cytokines such as Transforming Growth Factor-Beta (TGF-β) in the allograft. Chronic rejection is characterized by fibroproliferative occlusion of the small airways, leading to airflow obstruction and irreversible graft dysfunction. The exact mechanisms underlying BOS are multifactorial and may involve alloimmune responses, ischemia-reperfusion injury, infection and environmental factors.

Several therapeutic strategies have been proposed to mitigate pulmonary rejection and improve graft survival following lung transplantation in murine models. These include:

Immunosuppressive therapy: Conventional immunosuppressive agents such as calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., cyclosporine, tacrolimus), corticosteroids and antimetabolites (e.g., mycophenolate mofetil) have been used to suppress alloimmune responses and prevent rejection in murine models. However, these agents are associated with significant side effects and may not adequately control chronic rejection.

Biological therapies: Biological agents targeting specific immune pathways involved in pulmonary rejection, such as monoclonal antibodies against T cell co-stimulatory molecules (e.g., anti-CD40, anti-CD154), cytokines (e.g., anti-TNF-alpha, anti-IL-6), or complement components (e.g., anti-C5), have shown promise in murine models. These agents offer the potential for more targeted immunosuppression with fewer systemic side effects.

Tolerance induction: Strategies to induce donor-specific tolerance and promote immune quiescence in the allograft have been explored in murine models, including mixed chimerism, regulatory T cell therapy and costimulation blockade. These approaches aim to establish a state of immunological tolerance where the recipient's immune system tolerates the donor organ without the need for long-term immunosuppression [5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, delving into the immunopathology of pulmonary rejection following murine lung transplantation illuminates the intricate interplay between the immune system and the transplanted organ. Through comprehensive studies, researchers have gained valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms driving rejection, ranging from allorecognition and inflammatory responses to tissue remodeling and fibrosis. These findings not only enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology of lung rejection but also pave the way for the development of novel therapeutic strategies aimed at mitigating rejection and improving transplant outcomes. Moreover, the utilization of murine models offers a valuable platform for dissecting the complexities of pulmonary rejection, providing a basis for translational research into human lung transplantation. By continuing to unravel the immunological intricacies at play, we can strive towards achieving better long-term graft survival and ultimately enhance the quality of life for transplant recipients.

Furthermore, the insights gained from studying pulmonary rejection in murine models not only inform our understanding of rejection in lung transplantation but also have broader implications for the field of transplantation medicine as a whole. By elucidating the specific immune pathways and cellular interactions involved in graft rejection, researchers can identify potential targets for therapeutic intervention that may be applicable across different types of organ transplants. This multidisciplinary approach fosters collaboration between immunologists, transplant surgeons, and researchers, driving innovation in both basic science and clinical practice. Additionally, by refining murine models to better recapitulate the complexities of human lung transplantation, researchers can enhance the translational relevance of their findings, ultimately accelerating the development of novel therapeutic approaches. In essence, the study of pulmonary rejection after murine lung transplantation serves as a cornerstone in the quest to improve transplant outcomes, offering hope for patients in need of life-saving organ replacement therapies.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Sayegh, Mohamed H. and Charles B. Carpenter. "Transplantation 50 years later-progress, challenges and promises." N Engl J Med 351 (2004): 2761-2766.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Verleden, Geert M., Allan R. Glanville, Erika D. Lease and Andrew J. Fisher, et al. "Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Definition, diagnostic criteria and approaches to treatment-A consensus report from the Pulmonary Council of the ISHLT." J Heart Lung Transplant 38 (2019): 493-503.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Bos, Saskia, Luke Milross, Andrew J. Filby and Robin Vos, et al. "Immune processes in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Identifying the missing pieces of the puzzle." Eur Respir Rev 31 (2022).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Kloc, Malgorzata and Rafik M. Ghobrial. "Chronic allograft rejection: A significant hurdle to transplant success." Burns Trauma 2 (2014): 2321-3868.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Tilney, Nicholas L., W. David Whitley, Jonathan R. Diamond and Jerzey W. Kupiec-Weglinski, et al. "Chronic rejection-an undefined conundrum." Transplantation 52 (1991): 389-398.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at