Understanding the Quantification, Prevalence and Pretreatment Methods of Mycotoxins in Groundnuts

Maxence Dubreucq^*
*Correspondence: Maxence Dubreucq, Department of Geography, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, Email:

Introduction

Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by certain molds, posing significant risks to human and animal health. Groundnuts, also known as peanuts, are susceptible to contamination by various mycotoxins, presenting a serious concern for food safety and public health. This article aims to delve into the quantification, prevalence, and pretreatment methods of mycotoxins in groundnuts [1].

Description

Accurate quantification of mycotoxins in groundnuts is crucial for assessing the extent of contamination and implementing appropriate control measures. These methods offer different levels of sensitivity, specificity, and ease of use, allowing researchers and food safety authorities to choose the most suitable approach based on their requirements and resources. The prevalence of mycotoxins in groundnuts varies depending on several factors such as geographical location, climatic conditions, agricultural practices, and post-harvest handling. Aflatoxins, produced primarily by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus, are among the most prevalent mycotoxins in groundnuts. Aflatoxin B1, in particular, is highly carcinogenic and poses a significant health risk when consumed in contaminated food products. Other mycotoxins commonly found in groundnuts include ochratoxin A, fumonisins, and trichothecenes, each with its own set of toxicological effects [2-4].

Several pretreatment methods are employed to mitigate mycotoxin contamination in groundnuts, both at the pre-harvest and post-harvest stages. Pre-harvest interventions include implementing proper agricultural practices such as crop rotation, tillage, irrigation management, and the use of resistant cultivars. These practices aim to reduce mold growth and mycotoxin production in the field. Post-harvest interventions focus on minimizing mycotoxin formation during storage, transportation, and processing of groundnuts. Techniques such as sorting, cleaning, drying, and proper storage conditions are crucial for preventing mold growth and mycotoxin accumulation in stored groundnuts [5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, mycotoxin contamination poses a significant threat to the safety and quality of groundnuts. Various analytical techniques are employed for quantifying mycotoxins, including high-performance liquid chromatography liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and thin-layer chromatography. Accurate quantification, thorough understanding of prevalence factors, and effective pretreatment methods are essential for mitigating mycotoxin risks and ensuring the safety of groundnut products. Continued research efforts, combined with stringent regulatory measures and industry practices, are necessary to address this ongoing challenge and safeguard public health.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Turner, Nicholas W., Sreenath Subrahmanyam and Sergey A. Piletsky. "Analytical methods for determination of mycotoxins: A review."Anal Chim Acta 632 (2009): 168-180.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Yang, Yan, Guoliang Li, Di Wu and Jianghua Liu, et al. "Recent advances on toxicity and determination methods of mycotoxins in foodstuffs."Trends Food Sci Technol 96 (2020): 233-252.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Ismaiel, Ahmed A. and Jutta Papenbrock. "Mycotoxins: Producing fungi and mechanisms of phytotoxicity."Agriculture5 (2015): 492-537.

   Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Iqbal, Shahzad Z. "Mycotoxins in food, recent development in food analysis and future challenges; A review."Curr Opin Food Sci 42 (2021): 237-247.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Nazhand, Amirhossein, Alessandra Durazzo, Massimo Lucarini and Eliana B. Souto, et al. "Characteristics, occurrence, detection and detoxification of aflatoxins in foods and feeds."Foods9 (2020): 644.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at