Upholding Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Standards in Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy

Gang Sendler^*
*Correspondence: Gang Sendler, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 211A, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland, Email:

Introduction

Radiation therapy and nuclear medicine are invaluable medical modalities that utilize ionizing radiation to diagnose and treat a wide range of medical conditions, from cancer to neurological disorders. However, the use of radiation in these fields demands an unwavering commitment to patient safety and the highest quality of care. This article delves into the essential aspects of radiation safety and quality assurance in nuclear medicine and radiation therapy, emphasizing the measures taken to ensure patient well-being and the accurate delivery of treatment. A fundamental principle in nuclear medicine and radiation therapy is to keep radiation exposure to the patient as low as reasonably achievable. This is achieved through precise targeting and dose optimization to minimize unnecessary radiation exposure to healthy tissues. Radiation therapy facilities and nuclear medicine laboratories are equipped with specialized shielding to prevent radiation leakage and protect both patients and healthcare professionals. This includes lead-lined rooms, protective clothing and shielding materials to reduce radiation exposure. Healthcare professionals working with radiation undergo rigorous training to ensure they understand radiation safety protocols. This includes proper handling of radiopharmaceuticals, maintenance of safety equipment and monitoring radiation exposure levels [1].

Description

Informing patients about radiation therapy procedures, potential side effects and the importance of compliance with treatment plans is crucial. Patients should be empowered to make informed decisions regarding their care. Continuous monitoring of radiation levels is essential to ensure safety. Dosimetry measurements are performed to accurately calculate the radiation dose delivered to patients and verify that it aligns with the prescribed treatment. Regular maintenance and calibration of radiation therapy and nuclear medicine equipment are essential to ensure the accuracy of treatment and diagnostic procedures. Malfunctioning equipment can compromise patient safety and treatment efficacy. Treatment planning in radiation therapy involves meticulous design to precisely target tumors while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Quality assurance checks ensure that treatment plans are accurate and well-executed. In nuclear medicine, the quality of images is vital for accurate diagnosis. Regular calibration and quality control checks are performed on imaging equipment to maintain image quality and consistency. Strict protocols govern the handling, storage and disposal of radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine [2].

In regenerative medicine, EVs derived from stem cells can be harnessed for their regenerative and reparative properties. These EVs carry a payload of growth factors and cytokines that can promote tissue repair and regeneration. By delivering EVs to the site of injury, researchers aim to stimulate tissue healing and recovery. These measures ensure the safety of both patients and healthcare personnel. Radiopharmaceutical handling is a critical aspect of nuclear medicine and radiation therapy, ensuring the safe and effective use of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic imaging and treatment. Radiopharmaceuticals are compounds that contain radioactive isotopes and are administered to patients for various medical purposes, such as imaging specific organs or delivering targeted radiation therapy. Proper handling is crucial to protect both patients and healthcare professionals from unnecessary radiation exposure and to maintain the integrity of the radiopharmaceuticals. Healthcare professionals who handle radiopharmaceuticals must undergo specific training in radiation safety and the proper handling of radioactive materials [3].

One of the key challenges in using EVs as drug carriers is the scalability of production. Current isolation methods can be time-consuming, expensive and yield low quantities of pure EVs. Overcoming these challenges will be critical to enable large-scale production for clinical applications. The field of EV research faces standardization and characterization challenges. The heterogeneity of EV populations and variability in cargo composition require standardized isolation and characterization methods to ensure consistent drug delivery performance and reproducibility. As EV-based therapeutics move closer to clinical applications, regulatory approval and safety concerns become paramount. Robust preclinical studies and a thorough understanding of potential side effects and long-term consequences of EV-based therapies are essential for their successful translation. This includes radiologic technologists, nuclear medicine technologists, radiopharmacists and other relevant personnel. Facilities that handle radiopharmaceuticals must adhere to regulatory guidelines and requirements established by national and international agencies, such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in the United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [4,5].

Conclusion

Radiation safety and quality assurance are not solely the responsibility of healthcare providers but are a shared commitment between patients, healthcare professionals, regulatory bodies and facility management. Strict adherence to safety protocols, continuous training and effective communication are essential components of ensuring patient safety and the highest standard of care. In nuclear medicine and radiation therapy, quality assurance and radiation safety are non-negotiable. By upholding these principles, healthcare professionals and institutions can provide the best possible care, optimizing the effectiveness of treatment while prioritizing the health and well-being of patients. These measures underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to ensure that radiation-based therapies and diagnostics remain safe and effective in the realm of modern medicine.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

1. Chinot, Olivier L., Wolfgang Wick, Warren Mason and Roger Henriksson, et al. "Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy–temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma."N Engl J Med 370 (2014): 709-722.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Taal, Walter, Hendrika M. Oosterkamp, Annemiek ME Walenkamp and Hendrikus J. Dubbink, et al. "Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine vs. a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (belob trial): A randomised controlled phase 2 trial."Lancet Oncol 15 (2014): 943-953.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Blobner, Jens and Joerg-Christian Tonn. "Resection of glioma—Feeding the beast?."Neuro Oncol 24 (2022): 1088-1089.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Knudsen, Arnon Møldrup, Bo Halle, Oriane Cédile and Mark Burton, et al. "Surgical resection of glioblastomas induces pleiotrophin-mediated self-renewal of glioblastoma stem cells in recurrent tumors."Neuro Oncol 24 (2022): 1074-1087.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Ostrom, Quinn T., Gino Cioffi, Kristin Waite and Carol Kruchko, et al. "CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018."Neuro Oncol 23 (2021): iii1-iii105.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at