Why Swab-based DNA Sampling Isn’t Always the Perfect Solution

Zinzow Najavits^*
*Correspondence: Zinzow Najavits, Department of Forensic Sciences, Howest University of Applied Sciences, Rijselstraat 5, Brugge, Belgium, Email:

Introduction

Swab-based DNA sampling has revolutionized the way genetic material is collected, providing a non-invasive, easy-to-use method for obtaining DNA from individuals. It has found widespread applications in fields like criminal justice, ancestry testing, medical diagnostics, and even forensics. While swabbased DNA sampling has been lauded for its convenience and efficiency, it is not without limitations. Despite the many advantages, there are several instances in which this method may not always be the perfect solution. Issues such as contamination, limited sample yield, and challenges in preserving the quality of DNA extracted, among others, can undermine the effectiveness of swab-based DNA sampling in certain scenarios. It explores the reasons why swab-based DNA sampling isn’t always the perfect solution, discussing its limitations, potential pitfalls, and the challenges that arise in different contexts. We will also highlight alternative methods of DNA collection that may offer a better approach depending on the circumstances [1].

Saliva-based DNA sampling is similar to swab-based sampling, but it typically involves the collection of saliva directly from the mouth rather than scraping buccal cells with a swab. Saliva samples generally contain a higher concentration of DNA, particularly from the cells lining the mouth. The process is still non-invasive, but it may be more effective in obtaining sufficient DNA material for analysis. While saliva collection can be a good alternative to swabbased methods, it is also vulnerable to contamination from food, drink, or oral hygiene products [2].

Description

Swab-based DNA sampling is a widely recognized technique for extracting genetic material from individuals. The method typically involves using a cotton swab or a similar device to collect cells from the inside of a person’s mouth, often from the buccal (cheek) region. This method has grown in popularity due to its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal discomfort. The sample collected is usually preserved in a tube containing a stabilizing solution to protect the DNA from degradation until it can be analyzed in a laboratory. The primary appeal of swab-based DNA sampling lies in its non-invasive nature. Unlike blood samples, which require a needle and can be intimidating to some individuals, swabbing the inside of the cheek is painless and quick. Furthermore, the process can be carried out at home or in the field without requiring specialized medical personnel or equipment. This has made it a go-to method for consumer genetic testing services, as well as for law enforcement agencies in forensic investigations. Swab-based DNA sampling has opened the doors for individuals to learn more about their genetic heritage, identify potential health risks, and contribute to criminal investigations. It has also been used to identify family relationships and determine paternity. Its widespread use in different domains highlights its effectiveness and convenience. However, as with any technological advancement, there are inherent challenges that can compromise the accuracy, reliability, and usability of the samples obtained [3].

Despite the impressive advantages of swab-based DNA sampling, there are several inherent limitations and potential drawbacks that make it less than ideal in certain situations. These challenges need to be addressed in order to optimize DNA collection techniques and improve the overall reliability of genetic analyses. One of the primary concerns with swab-based DNA sampling is the risk of contamination. While swabbing the inside of the mouth may seem like a straightforward procedure, there is always a chance that the sample may become contaminated by foreign genetic material. Additionally, if the swab is not handled properly or stored in a contaminated tube, the quality of the DNA may be compromised. In forensic applications, the consequences of DNA contamination are particularly severe. A contaminated sample can lead to incorrect identification, wrongful convictions, or the failure to identify a perpetrator. This highlights the importance of following proper protocols during the collection process and ensuring that swabs are handled in a controlled, sterile environment. In many cases, contamination is an inevitable risk, and forensic professionals must take extra precautions to minimize it [4].

Swab-based DNA sampling has another major limitation in the form of insufficient DNA yield. Unlike blood or tissue samples, which tend to provide a larger amount of genetic material, swabs generally collect only a small amount of DNA. The buccal cells scraped from the inside of the cheek may not always provide enough genetic material for accurate analysis, particularly in cases where the person has a low number of cells present due to medical conditions, such as a dry mouth or certain genetic disorders. In forensic contexts, this insufficient DNA yield can create difficulties in generating reliable profiles, especially when the sample is degraded or when only trace amounts of DNA are left behind at a crime scene. The lower DNA yield also means that multiple swab samples may need to be collected to ensure that enough genetic material is available for analysis, further complicating the process. Another significant issue with swab-based DNA sampling is the potential degradation of the DNA over time. DNA is a fragile molecule that can break down due to environmental factors such as heat, moisture, and exposure to sunlight. While swabs are usually stored in stabilizing solutions to prevent degradation, the length of time between sample collection and analysis can have a significant impact on the quality of the DNA extracted [5].

Conclusion

Swab-based DNA sampling has undoubtedly transformed genetic testing and forensic science by providing a convenient and non-invasive method for DNA collection. However, it is important to recognize that this method is not always the perfect solution. The risk of contamination, insufficient DNA yield, degradation of samples, and sensitivity issues are all challenges that can affect the accuracy and reliability of DNA analysis. In cases where high-quality, large quantities of DNA are required, alternative methods such as blood sampling or saliva collection may offer more reliable results. The future of DNA sampling likely involves continued innovation, with researchers working to overcome the challenges associated with swab-based methods while also exploring new ways to improve DNA collection, preservation, and analysis. As DNA sampling technology advances, we can expect more accurate and reliable solutions tailored to meet the diverse needs of various industries and applications.

Acknowledgment

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

1. Bonsu, Dan Osei Mensah, Denice Higgins and Jeremy J. Austin. "Forensic touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces–a review." Sci Justice 60 (2020): 206-215.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Seiberle, Ilona, Jonathan Währer, Sarah Kron and Kurt Flury, et al. "Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery." Forensic Sci Int Genet 59 (2022): 102716.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Dieltjes, Patrick, René Mieremet, Sofia Zuniga and Thirsa Kraaijenbrink, et al. "A sensitive method to extract DNA from biological traces present on ammunition for the purpose of genetic profiling." Int J Leg Med 125 (2011): 597-602.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Morgan, Ashley G. and Mechthild Prinz. "Development of improved DNA collection and extraction methods for handled documents." Genes 14 (2023): 761.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Abdullah, Aanisah, Bianca Szkuta and Georgina E. Meakin. "Effect of swabbing technique and duration on forensic DNA recovery." Sci Justice 63 (2023): 343-348.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at