GET THE APP

Yield and Yield Components of Greenhouse Cucumber as Affected by irrigation Regimes and Growth Media
..

Irrigation & Drainage Systems Engineering

ISSN: 2168-9768

Open Access

Research - (2023) Volume 12, Issue 1

Yield and Yield Components of Greenhouse Cucumber as Affected by irrigation Regimes and Growth Media

MO Kareem1*, AG Shaibu1, M Samoura1 and IK Dzomeku2
*Correspondence: MO Kareem, Department of Agricultural Engineering, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana, Email:
1Department of Agricultural Engineering, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
2Department of Crop Science, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana

Received: 02-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. idse-23-85675; Editor assigned: 05-Jan-2023, Pre QC No. P-85675; Reviewed: 17-Jan-2023, QC No. Q-85675; Revised: 21-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. R-85675; Published: 30-Jan-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2168-9768.2023.14.365
Citation: Kareem, MO, AG Shaibu, M Samoura and IK Dzomeku. “Yield and Yield Components of Greenhouse Cucumber as Affected by irrigation Regimes and Growth Media.” Irrigat Drainage Sys Eng 14 (2023): 365.
Copyright: © 2023 Kareem MO, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

This research was carried out in a greenhouse located at Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) - Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI), Nyankpala, Northern Region of Ghana from June to September, 2022. The study compared the yield obtainable with greenhouse cucumber grown on soil with cocopeat and soil - biochar mixture under irrigation regimes. The experiment was a 3 x 3 factorial study laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The treatments consisted of irrigation regimes (100% ETc, 75% ETc, 50% ETc) and growth media including (Soil (So), Soil plus Charred rice husk (So + CRH) and Cocopeat (CP)). Data was collected on cucumber yield and yield parameters. The result of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed 100% ETc supported optimum yield of greenhouse cucumber. Flower count was highest for CP – grown plants irrigated at 100% ETc while the highest flower abortion occurred on plants grown on So + CRH at 75% ETc. Plants irrigated at 100% ETc gave the highest yield of 116.3 t/ha while those irrigated at 50% ETc gave the lowest yield of 37.8 t/ha. Yield obtained from plants irrigated at 75% ETc (70.6 t/ha) was similar to that obtained at 100% ETc; It is therefore recommended for greenhouse cucumber farmers in northern Ghana to irrigate at 75% ETc thereby saving water and optimizing yield. More work could be done on combination of CP and CRH for greenhouse cucumber production.

Keywords

Charred rice husk • Cocopeat • Flower abortion • Flower count • Soil

Introduction

Agricultural production in Ghana, particularly in the Northern part, is threatened by water scarcity and increased competition for available water resources, leading to insufficient water supply for agricultural production. Due to this limitation in availability of water, it becomes imperative to know how to irrigate timely with the least amount of water, for optimum yield, water efficiency and profit [1]. Irrigation has been suggested to play a vital role in control of food scarcity and poverty alleviation. It serves as a sure way of reducing drought impacts and improving agricultural productivity [2,3]. For example, according to Awe GO, et al. [4] drip irrigation technology has been advocated to ensure the optimal use of water and nutrients in agriculture and improving irrigation efficiency. Mao X, et al. [5] observed fruit yields of cucumber were especially highly affected by water deficiencies during fruiting stages.

Agricultural productivity is threatened by changing weather patterns, which result in climate change, increased rainfall variability and temperature fluctuations [6]. One of the adaptive strategies that can help cope with these changes is greenhouse cultivation, which helps in regulating the plant’s macro and micro environment, improving yield and quality of the produce and optimizing plant growth and development [7].

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is an important creeping vegetable and one of the most popular members of the Cucurbitaceae family with a high global consumer demand [8]. Cultivation of cucumber under greenhouse condition gives increased productivity and higher fruit quality, resulting in better market price in addition to the all year - round production. With this, cucumber becomes one of the major lucrative vegetables cropped under greenhouse conditions [9-11].

Soil is often the most available medium for growing plants as it supplies water, nutrient, air and support which are all necessary for plant growth [12]. However, most times, it has been found that cultivating vegetables in soil under greenhouse condition gives rise to risk of soil borne diseases including woot roots, root-knot nematode and root rots amongst others that has a negative effect on cucumber production [13-15]. Also, difficulty is mostly encountered in obtaining fertile arable lands, in this case, the soilless culture comes in handy. This culture does not involve the regular fumigation which is mostly done to soils and which leaves behind side effects on crops thereby causing health problems to man [16] mentioned that, soilless cultivation has been known internationally for its ability to maintain efficient plant production. These media are also relatively light weight, readily available and more uniform than mineral soils. This study compared the yield of cucumber grown on soil to those grown on cocopeat and soil mixed with rice husk biochar at varying irrigation regimes.

Materials and Methods

Experimental site and climatic data: The experiment took place under greenhouse conditions between the period of June 2022 to September, 2022. The greenhouse is located at the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) - Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI), close to the University for Development Studies (UDS), Nyankpala, Tolon District, Northern Region of Ghana. It is located between latitude 9.4066° N and longitude 0.9882° W, and elevation of 169m

Experimental design, treatments and replication: The experiment was a 3 x 3 factorial study laid out in Randomised Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The two sets of experimental treatments that were applied are: amount of water application and the growth media. The depth of irrigation application included: 100% crop water requirement (ETc) (I1), 75% ETc (I2) and 50% ETc (I3). The growth media included: soil (M1), soil plus charred rice husk(M2) and coco peat (M3)

Yield and yield parameters: Data were collected on yield and yield parameters including flower count, flower abortion, number of fruits, length of fruit and weight of fruit.

Statistical analysis: Data were arranged and organized for the suitability of statistical analysis; analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using Genstat software 12th edition. The significant treatment means were separated using least significance difference (LSD) at 5% probability level

Results

Cucumber plant yield parameters and yield: Significant differences were noted for the interactive effects of irrigation regimes by growth media (P<0.01), main effect of irrigation regimes (P<0.05) and main effects of growth media (P<0.01) on flower count. Flower abortion was significantly determined by the interactive effects of irrigation regimes by growth media (P<0.05) and the main effects of the growth media (P<0.05). The average fruit number per plant, average weight of fruit per plant and average yield were significantly determined by the effects of irrigation regime at p<0.001, p<0.05 and p<0.001 respectively. The average fruit length was significantly affected by the interactive effects of irrigation regimes by growth media. The average fruit count gave 3.95, 3.35 and 2.45 at 100% ETc, 75% ETc and 50% ETc respectively. The average fruit weight included 342.4g, 295.5g and 281.1g at 100% ETc, 75% ETc and 50% ETc respectively. Yield at 100% ETc, 75% ETc and 50% ETc were 116.3 t/ha, 70.6 t/ha and 37.8 t/ha respectively (Table 1, Figures 1-3, Table 2, Figures 4,5 , Table 3 and Figure 6).

Table 1: Interactive effects of irrigation regimes and growth media on flower count at 3 WAT.

IRRIGATION GROWTH MEDIA
So So + CRH CP
100% ETc 2.86 3.03 2.86
75% ETc 2.61 2.97 3.14
50% ETc 2.74 2.68 2.86
P value <0.01 - -
LSD (5%) 0.1943 - -
irrigation-drainage-systems-engineering-flower

Figure 1. Main effects of growth media on flower count at 4 WAT. Bars=SEM.

irrigation-drainage-systems-engineering-count

Figure 2. Main effects of irrigation regimes on flower count at 6 WAT. Bars=SEM.

irrigation-drainage-systems-engineering-growth

Figure 3. Main effects of growth media on flower abortion at 4 WAT. Bars=SEM.

Table 2: Interactive effects of irrigation regimes and growth media on flower abortion at 5 WAT.

IRRIGATION GROWTH MEDIA
So So + CRH CP
100% ETc 2.86 3.24 2.85
75% ETc 2.68 3.29 3.24
50% ETc 2.91 3.07 3.02
P value <0.05 - -
LSD (5%) 0.2851 - -
irrigation-drainage-systems-engineering-regimes

Figure 4. Effects of irrigation regimes on fruit count. Bars=SEM.

irrigation-drainage-systems-engineering-fruit-weight

Figure 5. Effects of irrigation regimes on fruit weight. Bars=SEM.

Table 3: Interactive effects of irrigation regimes and growth media on fruit length.

IRRIGATION REGIMES GROWTH MEDIA
 So  So + CRH  CP
100 % ETc 22.67 20.5 25
75 % ETc 22.42 21 19.17
50 % ETc 19.17 20.67 18.67
P value <0.05 - -
LSD (5%) 3.180 - -
irrigation-drainage-systems-engineering-yield

Figure 6. Effects of irrigation regimes on yield. Bars=SEM.

Discussion

As deficit irrigation increased, number of flowers reduced. This is not unexpected as had confirmed that, high moisture presence promotes production of flowers in crops. This result conformed to that of Silva CJD, et al. [17] who observed that, irrigation regimes ranging from 100 – 115% gave more flowers as compared to 50% ETc. and where flower number was reduced at an irrigation regime of 55%. Highest flower abortion was recorded for cucumber plants grown on So + CRH at 75% Etc. When this irrigation regime is compared to 100% ETc, the result agrees with the statement of Kaya C, et al. [18] that shortage of water in plants could result in flower and fruit loss in cucumber cultivation. As compared to 50% ETc however, high flower abortion at this irrigation regime is in contrast with other researchers who quoted increase in deficit irrigation to increase rate of flower abortion Ganeva D, et al. [19] affirmed the importance of sufficient irrigation, not in excess though, to reduce susceptibility of flower loss and fruit dropping. Flower abortion is seriously affected by genotype and environmental conditions. During the period of the research, the temperature and relative relative humidity remained within the normal range required for cucumber productivity, ranging from 29.3 – 35.9oC and 54% - 73.4% respectively. The high rate of abortion in plants grown on So + CRH could however be linked to disease infestation.

The average fruit count was highest at 100% ETc and lowest at 50% ETc. This is attributable to the favorable media moisture at this regime. This result conforms to that of Sahin U, et al. [20] & Adeogun EO [21] who attributed increased fresh fruit to increased irrigation amount. Weight of the plant is a very important parameter as it represents a major portion of the yield. Cucumber fruits irrigated at 100% ETc were the heaviest followed by 75% ETc and 50% ETc. This result conforms with the research of Al H, et al. [3] and Ganeva D, et al. [19] who had highest fruit weight at 100% ETc. This contradicts other researchers including Omotade (2019) who had highest cucumber fruit weight at 80% ETc. Plants grown in CP recorded the highest average length, this could be attributed to their highly developed root systems which enables maximum exploration of the media thereby leading to higher absorption of water and nutrients, thus making them perform optimally as regards fruit length. This result is in line with Ameho CS [22] who reported highest fruit length in CP, palm fibre and CP plus palm fibre. The effect of irrigation amount on cucumber fruit yield cannot be over emphasized [23]. As the quantity of irrigation decreased, cucumber yield reduced, this could be linked to the high moisture availability as cucumber plants are known to be water – loving, most especially at the flowering and fruiting stage. This could also be associated with the increased plant height at this irrigation regime as compared to 75% and 50% ETc as tall plants are able to intercept more light for optimum photosynthesis to take place. This result agrees with other researchers who also found highly appreciable yield with 100% ETc and thus, reported increased yield of cucumber to have a linear relationship with increasing water application [24-26]. The yield at 75% ETc (70.6 t/ha) was close to what was obtained at 100% ETc (116.3 t/ha). This can be related to other researchers such as Rahil MH and Qanadillo A [27] where the highest fruit yield was determined by plant irrigated at 70% ETc followed by those at full irrigation of 100% ETc, Omotade I and Babalola I [28]. who determined highest fruit yield at 80% ETc and Hossain S, et al. [12] where highest yield was obtained at 85% Etc [29-31].

Conclusion

• CP – grown plants irrigated at 100% ETc gave the highest flower count

• Plants grown on So + CRH at 75% ETc resulted in the highest flower abortion

• Plants irrigated at 100% ETc accounted maximum yield of greenhouse grown cucumber. Yield at 100% ETc (116.3 t/ha) was similar to 75% ETc (70.6 t/ha)

Recommendations

The differences between cucumber plants irrigated at 100 and 75% ETc was not significant in relation to some of the yield and yield parameters. It is therefore recommended for cucumber growers in the greenhouse to irrigate at 75% ETc, in order to maximize yield while saving water.

• More work could be done on combination of CP and CRH for greenhouse cucumber production.

• Comparative research may be conducted in the field and greenhouse to confirm their effects in cucumber production in Ghana.

Acknowledgement

Center for Water, Irrigation and Sustainable Agriculture (WACWISA), University for Development Studies (UDS), Ghana with funding support from the Government of Ghana and World Bank through the African Centres of Excellence for Development (ACE) Impact initiative

References

  1. Payero, José O., David D. Tarkalson, Suat Irmak and Don Davison, et al. "Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass." Agric Water Manag 96 (2009): 1387-1397.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Porter, John R., Liyong Xie, Andrew Challinor UK and Mark Howden, et al. "Food Security and Food Production Systems." Methods 7: 1-1.
  4. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  5. Al, Hossain, Shaikh Abdullah Al Mamun, Wang Lixue and Chen Taotao, et al. "Leaf area index assessment for tomato and cucumber growing period under different water treatments." Plant Soil Environ 63 (2017): 461-467.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Awe, Gabriel Oladele, Busola Margret Ayuba, Japheth Umam  and Toyin Peter Abegunrin. "Short-Term Impact of Drip Irrigation Frequency on Soil Hydro-Physical Properties of an Alfisol and Performance of Two Maize Varieties." Turkish J Food Sci Technol 8 (2020): 1675-1685.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Mao, Xuesen, Mengyu Liu, Xinyuan Wang and Changming Liu et al."Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and water use of greenhouse grown cucumber in the North China Plain." Agric Water Manag 61 (2003): 219-228.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Ismail, Ibrahim Garba, Zahra Buhari Fatima and Kabir Samaila Bello. "Response of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) to differential pruning under greenhouse." J Dryland Agric 6 (2020): 10-16.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  13. Gruda, Nazim. "Impact of environmental factors on product quality of greenhouse vegetables for fresh consumption." Crit Rev Plant Sci  24 (2005): 227-247.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  15. Eifediyi, E. K  and S. U. Remison. "Growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as influenced by farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizer." J Plant Breed Crop Sci2 (2010): 216-220.
  16. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  17. El-Wanis, M. M. A., M. H. Abdel-Baky and S. R. Salman. "Effect of grafting and salt stress on the growth, yield and quality of cucumber grown in NFT system." ResJ Appl Sci (2012): 5059-5067.
  18. Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Beawuchi, Izuchukwu Innocent, Opara Rose Iheoma, Oyibo Patricia Obilo and J. C. Obiefuna. "Effect of time of mulch application on the growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) in Owerri, Southeastern Nigeria." J Life Sci 5 (2008): 68-71.
  20. Google Scholar

  21. Kumar, Parveen, R. S. Chauhan and R. K. Grover. "Comparative economics of cucumber cultivation under polyhouses and open field conditions in Haryana." Indian J Econ Dev 3 (2015): 1-4.
  22. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  23. Hossain, Shaikh, Abdullah Al Mamun, Lixue Wang and Haisheng Liu. "Improved greenhouse cucumber production under deficit water and fertilization in Northern China." Int JAgricBiol Eng 11 (2018): 58-64.
  24. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  25. Cohen, R., G. Orgil, Y. Burger and U. Saar, et al. "Differences in the responses of melon accessions to fusarium root and stem rot and their colonization by F usarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis‐cucumerinum." Plant Pathol 64 (2015): 655-663.
  26. Google Scholar, Crossref

  27. Elings, Anne, S. L. Speetjens  and N. Garcia Victoria. “Greenhouse designs for Mexico aguascalientes, querétaro and sinalo” Wageningen UR Greenhouse Hortic  (2014).
  28. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  29. Gamliel, A and A. H. C. Van Bruggen. "Maintaining soil health for crop production in organic greenhouses." Sci Hortic 208 (2016): 120-130.
  30. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  31. Barrett, G. E., P. D. Alexander, J. S. Robinson and N. C. Bragg. "Achieving environmentally sustainable growing media for soilless plant cultivation systems–A review." Sci Hortic 212 (2016): 220-234.        
  32. Google Scholar, Crossref

  33. Silva, Cícero J. da, José A. Frizzone, Luiz fm da Silva and Ygor A. de O. Santos, et al. "Flower abortion and yield of processing tomato according to irrigation depths." Rev BrasEng AgricAmbient25 (2021): 415-421.
  34. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  35. Kaya, Cengiz, David Higgs and Halil Kirnak. "Influence of polyethylene mulch, irrigation regime, and potassium rates on field cucumber yield and related traits." JPlant Nutr 28, (2005): 1739-1753.
  36. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  37. Ganeva, Daniela, Stanislava Grozeva and Galina Pevicharova. "Effect of reduced irrigation on flowering, fruit set and yield of indeterminate tomato." Int J Recent Technol Eng 8 (2019): 932-936.
  38. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  39. Sahin, U., Y. Kuslu and F. M. Kiziloglu. "Response of cucumbers to different irrigation regimes applied through drip-irrigation system." JAPS: J Anim Plant Sci 25 (2015).
  40. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  41. Adeogun, E. O. “Effect of different irrigation water regime on cucumber yield and water use under sprinkler system” 12 (2017): 10–18.
  42. Crossref

  43. Ameho, C. S. "Comparative effect of soilless substrates on growth, yield and fruit quality of greenhouse grown cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L.)." PhD diss., University of Ghana, (2017).
  44. Google Scholar

  45. Hashem, FA, Medany MA, El-Moniem EM Abd and Abdallah MMF. "Influence of green-house cover on potential evapotranspiration and cucumber water requirements." Arab Univ J Agric Sci 19 (2011): 205-215.
  46.  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  47. Zhang, Guoqiang, Dongping Shen, Bo Ming and Ruizhi Xie, et al. "Using irrigation intervals to optimize water-use efficiency and maize yield in Xinjiang, northwest China." Crop J7 (2019): 322-334.
  48. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  49. Al-Omran, A. M and I I Louki. "Yield response of cucumber to deficit irrigation in greenhouses." WIT TransEcol Environ 145 (2011): 517-524.
  50. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  51. Ayas, Serhat and Cigdem Demirtas. "Deficit irrigation effects on cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. Maraton) yield in unheated greenhouse condition." (2009).
  52. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  53. Rahil, M. H and Alia Qanadillo. "Effects of different irrigation regimes on yield and water use efficiency of cucumber crop." Agric Water Manag 148 (2015): 10-15.
  54. Google Scholar, Crossref

  55. Aguyoh, Joseph Nyamori and Judith Achieng Odhiambo. "Soil moisture levels affect growth, flower production and yield of cucumber." (2022).
  56. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  57. Omotade, İfeoluwa and ifeoluwapo Babalola. "Assessment of yield and fruit quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) under defıcıt irrıgatıon in the agro-ecologıcal tropıcal zone." Int J Eng Sci 3 (2019): 137-141.
  58. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  59. Fawzy, Z. F. "Effect of irrigation systems on vegetative growth, fruit yield, quality and irrigation water use efficiency of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) grown under water stress conditions." Acta sci agric 3 (2019): 172-183.
  60. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  61. Wang, Ning, Fengzhen Fu, Hongrong Wang and Peng Wang, et al. "Effects of irrigation and nitrogen on chlorophyll content, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)." Sci Rep 11 (2021): 1-9.
  62. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 835

Irrigation & Drainage Systems Engineering received 835 citations as per Google Scholar report

Irrigation & Drainage Systems Engineering peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward