Riddhi Shah*, Ruwan Kasturi, Miriam Carone, Faisal Mihaimeed and Jason Saunders
Newham University Hospital, United Kingdom
Scientific Tracks Abstracts: Surgery
Introduction: In November 2019 the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) suggested that a higher age cut-off of 30 years, as opposed to 25, may be appropriate in assessment of a lump when a fibroadenoma, lipoma or hamartoma is suspected and a needle biopsy may not be required. We assessed whether this change in practice could be safely implemented, supported by local data and if we could adopt this in a multi-ethnic inner-city population. Method: A retrospective audit of patients aged between 25 and 30-years undergoing core biopsy for well-defined U2 lesions from December 2018 to December 2019. Review of electronic health records for clinical grading and assessment, ultrasound and histology reports. Results: There were a total of 46 female patients with a mean age of 27 years. All patients had benign clinical findings, P2. All ultrasound reports were U2, a fibroadenoma was mentioned in 25 and a welldefined lesion in 21. Histology confirmed B2 pathology in 40 cases (87%) [fibroadenoma in 28, benign changes 4, stromal fibrosis 3, inflammation 2, hamartoma 2 and sclerosing adenosis 1] Four cases were B1 (9%) [Minor benign changes] and 2 (4%) were B3, phyllodes cannot be ruled out. The latter 2 were excised with a final pathology of a cellular fibroadenoma in one case and benign phyllodes. Conclusion: Our retrospective data suggests that to raise the biopsy threshold to 30 years would potentially miss a clinically significant diagnosis in only 2% of cases. However, further prospective audit is required before adoption of the new recommendation.
Riddhi Shah is affiliated to Newham University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Journal of Surgery received 288 citations as per Google Scholar report