Daria Chmielewska and Magdalena Hartman-Petrycka
Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Poland
Medical University of Silesia, Poland
Posters & Accepted Abstracts: Physiother Rehabil
Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of different intensity synchronous whole-body vibration and
stochastic resonance whole-body vibration on reflex activity of pelvic floor muscles.
Materials & Methods: This was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group study among 18 nulliparous women who
were not professional athletes. FV participants (n=9) were exposed to whole-body vibration on vibration platform
Fitvibe 600 (Gymna Uniphy N.V) while ST participants (n=9) were exposed to stochastic resonance whole-body
vibration (SRT Zeptor® Medical-plus noise). Stages I and II of the study were the same for both group. Stage I consisted
of the measurement of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the pelvic floor muscles in the testing position,
stage II-60s sEMG recording - vibration switched off. In FV group, stage III consisted of 60s sEMG recordings
during synchronous whole-body vibration of 2 different intensities (random order): 40 Hz/ 4 mm and 60Hz/4mm.
In ST group, stage III consisted of 60s sEMG recordings during stochastic resonance whole-body vibration of 4
different vibration intensities (basic frequency/noise level) (random order): 6 Hz/ noise 3; 6 Hz/ noise 5; 10 Hz/ noise
3; and 10 Hz/ noise 5.
Results: Significant differences in median frequency were revealed between vertical vibrations produced by Fitvibe
600 platform (40 Hz and 60 Hz) and stochastic resonance whole-body vibration 10 Hz/ noise 3. The mean amplitude
(%MVC) and peak amplitude (%MVC) did not differ significantly between the groups and vibration intensities
(Friedman ANOVA by ranks, post-hoc test).
Conclusion: the median frequency of synchronous whole-body vibrations was significantly higher than that of
stochastic resonance whole-body vibration.
E-mail: d.chmielewska@awf.katowice.pl