Francis Osita Okpala
Chief Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki (AEFUTHA), Nigeria.
2enior Lecturer, and Coordinator, Radiology Programme, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria
Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Cancer Sci Ther
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is now the leading cause of disability globally. Patients often have lumbar spine
motion dysfunction (decrease or increase in motion), and this may affect the degree of lumbar lordosis (LL). The
relationship between LL and LBP has immense clinical significance, because it serves as the basis of therapeutic
exercises for treating and preventing LBP. An angular measure of LL that consistently detects even a small lordotic
change (LC) would be considered reliable.
Aims and Objectives: Evaluation of the consistency of each of four radiographic angles in detecting a LC in a
potential LBP disorder.
Methodology: Four radiographic angles [Lumbosacral angle (LSA), lumbosacral joint angle (LSJA), Cobb angle,
and Tangential radiologic assessment of lumbar lordosis (TRALL) angle] were retrospectively used to measure LL
in spondylotic (test case) and normal (control) lumbosacral spine radiographs of both genders; their consistency in
detecting intra-gender LC between cases (tests versus controls) was evaluated. In each gender, the cases (tests versus
controls) were similar in number as follows: LSA (125), LSJA (115), Cobb angle (118), and TRALL angle (101). All
cases were â?¥ 17 years of age. Data was analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 (NY, USA); P < .05 was considered
statistically significant.
Result: LSJA detected slight intra-gender LC in both genders, LSA in the males only, Cobb and TRALL angles in
none.
Conclusion: LSJA is a reliable measure of lumbar LC in therapeutic exercises (Flexion and extension movements or
positions) for treating and preventing various forms of LBP.
Keywords: Low back pain, Lumbar lordosis, Evaluation, Radiographic angle, Consistency.
E-mail: frankokp@yahoo.com
Cancer Science & Therapy received 5282 citations as per Google Scholar report